Newly released reports showed many US hospice facilities had at least one deficiency.
(CNN) - Maggots growing around a dying man's feeding tube. Staff failing to treat the wounds of a patient with Alzheimer's disease, forcing the amputation of a leg. Caregivers unable to recognize injuries on a woman's pelvic area as signs of sexual assault and repeatedly trying to insert a urinary catheter instead, sending the woman to a hospital.
These are just a few of the graphic details revealed in two reports
on US hospice care released Tuesday by the Office of Inspector General
for the Department of Health and Human Services. More than 80% of
end-of-life facilities in the United States had at least one deficiency,
the report found, and more than 300 -- about 18% -- were poor
performers with serious problems that jeopardized patient health and
safety.
In a statement, a CMS spokesperson said that the agency "has zero tolerance for abuse and mistreatment of any patient, and CMS requires that every Medicare-certified hospice meet basic federal health and safety standards to keep patients safe."
In a letter to the inspector general that was included in the report, CMS administrator Seema Verma defended her agency's record and argued that the report highlighted only the worst violations.
The inspector general found
that "these hospices did not face serious consequences for the harm
described in this report" and argued that the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) needs greater legal authority to penalize
hospices with life-threatening violations.
"CMS
cannot impose penalties, other than termination, to hold hospices
accountable for harming beneficiaries," the report said. Congress would
have to give the agency permission to impose fines on hospices, which it
can already levy against nursing facilities, and the inspector general urged CMS to seek that authority.
It
is also nearly impossible for the public to know about hospice
deficiencies like those described in the report because CMS does not
include that information on its Hospice Compare website.
The
agency cannot legally disclose all deficiency information it receives
-- such as survey reports from outside accrediting organizations -- but
the agency can publish reports from state agencies, according to the
inspector general. So far, it has chosen not to.
Graphic details and serious violations, but few consequences
In a statement, a CMS spokesperson said that the agency "has zero tolerance for abuse and mistreatment of any patient, and CMS requires that every Medicare-certified hospice meet basic federal health and safety standards to keep patients safe."
Medicare spent more than $17 billion on
hospice care in 2017, according to the report, and cared for more than
1.5 million patients. But some of that government-funded care actively
endangered patients, according to the Office of Inspector General, and
hospices suffered few consequences.
In
one case, a woman was consistently abused by her daughter, who was
acting as her caregiver. "The daughter would use a chain and elastic
seatbelt to keep the beneficiary from getting out of bed," the report
stated. "The daughter would also leave her mother in a wheelchair in the
bathroom with the lights off and would spray her with water when she
called out for help."
The hospice's
social worker was notified of signs of abuse, the report found, but did
not visit the patient for several weeks. When the social worker finally
visited, he didn't assess the patient's safety.
In another case, a woman sustained
significant injuries in her pelvic area, on her upper leg and on her
right forearm. Hospice staff failed to recognize these as signs of a
possible sexual assault, the report found, and did not report them to
hospice administrators or local law enforcement.
Instead,
the hospice obtained a physician's order to insert a urinary catheter,
which staff tried and failed to insert multiple times. The woman was
eventually sent to a hospital, where staff recognized signs of the
possible sexual assault and called the police.
But
the hospice said that it was under no obligation to report the possible
sexual assault to CMS, according to the inspector general report. "CMS
requires a hospice to report abuse, neglect, and other harm in only one
circumstance: when it involves someone furnishing services on behalf of
the hospice and the hospice has investigated and verified the
allegation," the report notes.
Because an accusation of assault had not
been leveled against a hospice employee, "the hospice claims that it
had no obligation to investigate the possible assault of a beneficiary
in its care," according to the inspector general.
In
another case, one patient's neighbor repeatedly came into his apartment
"naked, high, and drunk" and stole medications, including opioids and
anti-anxiety pills. While several hospice employees were aware of the
situation, "the hospice planned no further actions to notify law
enforcement or to ensure the beneficiary's safety," according to the
report.
While nursing facilities
must report all alleged abuse or exploitation to officials, including
CMS, the hospices have no such obligation under Medicare reporting
requirements, according to the inspector general.
Administrators defend their record
In a letter to the inspector general that was included in the report, CMS administrator Seema Verma defended her agency's record and argued that the report highlighted only the worst violations.
"While
these cases that were identified during surveys of hospices are very
serious," said Verma, "we want to reassure beneficiaries considering
hospice care that these cases are not indicative of the type of care the
majority of hospice beneficiaries receive."
CMS agreed with most of the inspector
general's recommendations, such as educating hospices on common
deficiencies and increasing oversight of the most serious offenders, but
argued that state reports on hospice violations should not be publicly
accessible on the agency's website, Hospice Compare.
"CMS
stated that while it supports increased transparency of hospice survey
findings, publicly reporting survey reports only from State agencies --
while CMS is currently prohibited from sharing information from surveys
by accrediting organizations -- may be misleading to consumers while
researching hospice options," according to the inspector general.
Those
state reports are currently required to be publicly available,
according to the report, but CMS has not made them easily accessible.
President Trump's 2020 budget
includes a proposal to allow disclosure of survey reports from
accrediting organizations, Verma said. If the agency receives that
authority, she added, CMS will "evaluate the best approach for publicly
disclosing these reports."
The agency said in a statement that it
has taken other actions to ensure patient safety, arguing that it is
"laser-focused on improving its oversight of healthcare facilities,
including hospices," according to a spokesperson.
"Just
this year, CMS issued new guidance to surveyors -- who inspect hospices
and other facilities -- to help them more quickly identify and address
the most grave patient safety situations, called 'immediate jeopardy,' "
said the spokesperson. "CMS now requires surveyors to follow a
standardized process when they identify immediate jeopardy situations."
But
agency actions can only go so far, according to the inspector general,
and actually improving conditions may fall to congress. "CMS should seek
statutory authority to establish additional, intermediate remedies for
poor hospice performance," said the report. "To effectively protect
beneficiaries from harm, CMS must have enforcement tools."
Full Article & Source:
Maggots, amputations and naked thieves: Government watchdog details hospice deficiencies
1 comment:
Wow. Seema Verma seems to be part of the problem. She just keeps back peddling, making promises, and foot dragging, when she just needs to do something! CMS routinely pays bills for items that show the billing agency is running a scam...opiods in huge amounts for elders, black boxed drugs not to be given to elders, billing for a more complex part of the body, DRG farming...in my Mom's case at Saddleback Memorial where CMS was billed for a broken ankle rather than a broken fibula. Billing for the flu when the patient only had mild UTI along with broken fibula. Billing for congestive heart failure so they could give my Mom two diuretics at the same time: hydrochlorothiazide and lasix at the same time, with no supporting diagnostic studies until I demanded a doppler which showed that her heart was fine. Meanwhile all this footdragging allows more hospitals and hospices to collect money from the CMS Shared Savings Program, from the deaths of what should have been salvageable seniors who could have gotten better and returned to active life. If the senior survives the assault by these once reputable fascilities, it is more expensive to rehab them back to an active life...at the families expense. It has to be admitted by anyone doing eldercare that senior healthcare is a sham and a total fraud. Why are seniors being tempted by these new health plans that offer gym memberships, transportation etc? Because most of them will never be healthy enough to use them, once inside the grist mill. These plans are utter fraud. My Uncle was knocked off in one of them, and once in, there is no escape for even a 2nd opinion. All of you reading this will sooner or later be part of the target age, so don't ignore this. There are serious problems that need to be corrected, unless you think all that money you paid into Social Security is your generous contribution to your own murder.
Post a Comment