by Dave Stafford
An ex-Indiana judge whose former law office is accused of stealing
hundreds of thousands of dollars from an estate he established that was
meant to go to charity has been sanctioned — as has his defense attorney
— after a judge ruled they made false statements and attempted to
mislead the court in the charity’s civil lawsuit.
One-time Jasper County Judge Robert Monfort and his attorney, Vincent
Antaki of the Reminger law firm, were ordered last week to pay the
plaintiff’s attorney fees and costs in responding to Monfort’s motion to
dismiss a lawsuit brought by the Jasper Newton Foundation.
Special Judge Mary Harper in Jasper Superior Court found that both
Monfort and Antaki asserted repeatedly that no money had been disbursed
from the estate of Rose Nagel, who had been a client of Monfort’s when
he made her estate plan that included substantial gifts to local
Catholic schools through the foundation. The recipients have received no
distribution from the estate of Nagel, who died more than three years
ago.
“As it turns out, roughly $218,000 had been distributed from the
Estate by the time Monfort asserted otherwise,” Harper wrote in a July 13 order. She
also found both Monfort and Antaki violated Indiana Trial Rule 11(A),
in particular that “(t)he signature of an attorney constitutes a
certificate by him that he has read the pleadings; that to the best of
his knowledge, information, and belief, there is good ground to support
it; and that it is not interposed for delay.”
Harper found the opposite was true regarding arguments that no loss
had been incurred in the Nagel estate. “Clearly, the No-Loss Assertions
were false,” she wrote. “There is no question Monfort violated Ind.
Trial Rule 11(A). As for Monfort’s counsel, Vincent P. Antaki, the
parties argued over an attorney’s duty to verify the information he
receives from his client. … Here, Monfort’s counsel argued the No-Loss
Assertions arose form a ‘misunderstanding.’ He did not explain this
misunderstanding, nor did he inform this Court of what steps he took, if
any, to verify what Monfort told him. Also, he made no attempt to
correct the record.
“… This Court finds Monfort and Monfort’s counsel attempted to
intentionally mislead this Court with false statements designed to
obfuscate issues, delay the proceedings, induce this court to make an
obvious legal error, waste judicial resources, and escalate the
Plaintiff’s costs,” Harper wrote.
She ordered both Monfort and Antaki to pay the plaintiff’s attorney
fees related to responding to Monfort’s motion to dismiss, preparing for
and attending a hearing on the motion as well as preparing the
sanctions motion.
Monfort faced discipline for
misconduct related to the Nagel case and another estate his former
Monon law firm established. He is accused in separate lawsuits of
misappropriating hundreds of thousands of dollars to his law firm, an
office employee and a family member after the clients died.
Last month, Monfort resigned from the Indiana bar
rather than face an attorney discipline case. In doing so, he was
required to acknowledge there was an Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary
Commission proceeding alleging misconduct and that he could not
successfully defend himself if prosecuted.
Monfort has not been criminally charged.
Harper set a hearing for Sept. 9 on attorney fees and costs as well
as on the plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery served on co-defendant
Teri Hardin. She was Monfort’s former office manager who also had served
as personal representative of Nagel’s estate.
Full Article & Source:
Ex-judge accused of trust theft, his lawyer sanctioned for bid to ‘mislead’ court
No comments:
Post a Comment