Written by: Latisha Bernard Schuenemann and Paul W. Minnich
The Act has four major amendments to Title 20 of Decedents, Estates and Fiduciaries (the Pennsylvania “PEF Code”) relating to incapacitated individuals including provisions: (1) requiring mandatory appointment of legal counsel for the alleged incapacitated individual; (2) consideration of less restrictive alternatives to guardianship; (3) certifications for court appointed guardians; and (4) required review hearings of the guardianship.
The Act now mandates that all alleged incapacitated individuals must have legal representation throughout the guardianship proceedings, whether through their own counsel or court-appointed counsel. It requires that the petitioner inform the Court of any counsel the alleged incapacitated person may have at the time of the filing of the guardianship petition. If the alleged incapacitated individual hasn’t retained counsel in any matter pertaining to the guardianship, the Court must appoint qualified counsel to represent them. The appointed counsel is required to file a certification with the Court indicating the time and place of meeting with the alleged incapacitated person. The Act requires appointed counsel be qualified by experience or training and should advocate for the individual’s expressed wishes and instructions to the extent possible. This requirement of counsel extends through all stages of the guardianship proceedings including any review hearings. In addition, the Act provides if the Court deems a guardian ad litem necessary, a second attorney will be appointed for this role.
Exploration of Less Restrictive Alternatives
While
it was always a consideration of the Courts, the Act now requires
Courts to make specific findings of fact regarding whether there are
less restrictive alternatives available. The less restrictive
alternatives to be considered include advanced directives, living wills,
powers of attorney, trusts/special need trusts, representative payees
for individuals receiving Social Security benefits, Pennsylvania
Achieving a Better Life Experience accounts, and mental health advanced
directives. The Court is required to consider the less restrictive
alternative first and if there are no less restrictive alternatives
available and sufficient, then the Court is to consider a limited
guardianship if it is applicable in the guardianship matter.
Mandatory Certification of Guardians
Professional
guardians and individuals seeking to become the guardian of three or
more incapacitated individuals will be required to be certified and
furnish evidence of compliance with certification requirements to the
Court, prior to appointment in a third guardianship matter. The Court
can waive this requirement upon demonstration that the proposed guardian
has the equivalent license or certification necessary to ensure they
can meet their obligations as guardian.
The Act puts the onus on the Supreme Court to develop the rules relating to the certification requirements of a guardian which will include a minimum of providing information and documentation regarding their education, employment history, and Federal and State criminal record and the passage of a certification exam administered by a national nonprofit guardianship certification organization.
Review Hearings
Prior to the Act, the PEF Code
did provide that a review hearing could be requested at any time. Now
the Act requires an automatic review hearing if the evidence presented
during the guardianship proceeding indicates that the circumstances of
the person’s incapacity may change. If the Court believes this to be the
case, it must schedule a review hearing in its court order establishing
the guardianship. The review hearing must be scheduled within one year
from the date of the initial guardianship appointment.
During the mandatory review hearing, the incapacitated individual is to be present with their counsel, and the Court may consider any evidence presented that the incapacitated person’s condition could improve at a future time. This evidence may include, but is not limited to:
- Whether the incapacitated could be adequately managed by medication, rehabilitation or other means;
- Whether the potential exists for the incapacitated to regain physical or cognitive capacity;
- The opinion of medical professionals or other qualified experts who have personally examined the incapacitated individual; and
- The circumstances surrounding the incapacitated individuals daily living, including but not limited to, support from others.
If the Court finds the guardianship is necessary and there are no less restrictive alternatives available, the Court may order that the guardianship continue. However, the Court is required to discharge the guardianship if it finds that the guardianship is no longer necessary or the existence of less restrictive alternatives.
Act 61 represents a crucial step forward in safeguarding the rights and welfare of individuals involved in guardianship proceedings in Pennsylvania. These new provisions also introduce new complexities to the guardianship process and underscore the importance for experienced legal counsel in order to navigate these intricacies. If you have questions about Act 61 or navigating the guardianship process, please contact partner Paul M. Minnich of Barley Snyder’s Litigation Practice Group or partner Latisha Bernard Schuenemann of Barley Snyder’s Trusts & Estates Practice Group.
Full Article & Source:
Guardianship Law Update: Stricter Pennsylvania Guardianship Laws under Act 61 to Take Effect in June
No comments:
Post a Comment