Showing posts with label attorneys face disciplinary action. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attorneys face disciplinary action. Show all posts
Saturday, May 26, 2018
Palmetto lawyers struck out when they gave baseball tickets to judge in their case, ruling says
Scott Kallins and Melton Little, who is running for the Manatee County Commission District 4 seat, could face discipline as severe as disbarment.
The judge who heard evidence about their misconduct, however, recommended one year of probation and that they be required to speak about their wrongdoing in front of other attorneys.
The two attorneys are partners at the Palmetto-based firm of Kallins Little Delgado. The firm's well-known slogan "We Play Hardball" is featured in television commercials showing both attorneys and their third partner. Jim Delgado, carrying baseball bats.
The Florida Bar filed ethics complaints against both attorneys with the Florida Supreme Court in March 2017 after their own investigation of what happened. The Bar found Kallins and Little had created an appearance of impropriety by offering and giving Rays tickets to former Circuit Judge John Lakin while he was presiding over one of their cases. The attorneys had also called into question Lakin's impartiality, the Bar found.
Circuit Judge Archie B. Hayworth Jr., from the 20th Judicial Circuit and appointed by the Florida Supreme Court to act as a referee in the matter, presided over a three-day-long trial that ended April 26. On Tuesday, Hayworth issued his recommendation to the Supreme Court.
Kallins and Little should be found guilty of misconduct, Hayworth recommended, and each should be given an admonishment and be placed on probation for one year.
"While respondents are veteran attorneys who should have known better, and their conduct created an appearance of impropriety that could have damaged the public perception of judicial impartiality, there was no evidence presented of actual prejudice to the underlying case," Hayworth stated in the order.
A call from comment to Kallins and Little for comment has not yet been returned.
The underlying case at the center of this is a civil suit filed by Sandy Wittke — represented by the law firm Kallins Little & Delgado — in August 2012 in which she claimed that Wal-Mart was at fault when she slipped and fell in December 2009 at the store at 5315 Cortez Road W., Bradenton.
The jury in the case, presided over by Lakin, ruled in favor of Wal-Mart but Lakin later granted Kallins Little & Delgado’s motion for a new trial on Wittke’s behalf. Wal-Mart appealed Lakin’s decision and in October 2016 the Second District Court of Appeals reversed his decision and reinstated the jury’s verdict.
Lakin was facing a formal charge of misconduct from the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission at the time, and in March 2016 he resigned. Lakin has since returned to private practice and is also facing an ethics compliant from the Florida Bar. His trial is scheduled to begin Wednesday.
During last month's trial, Kallins and Little expressed remorse and admitted their actions were wrong, Hayworth noted. Evidence presented at trial regarding their character was found compelling, and the judge found that their public service and charitable work in the community would be hindered or eliminated if the two attorneys were suspended.
Given their reputations, Hayworth found that it would be more effective discipline to require both attorneys to speak about the incident before new attorneys at required continuing education programs and to veteran attorneys at one more or conferences about how to avoid similar misconduct.
Based on Hayworth's recommendation, both attorneys could be ordered to pay $5,300 in fees.
Full Article & Source:
Palmetto lawyers struck out when they gave baseball tickets to judge in their case, ruling says
Friday, November 4, 2016
Candidate’s law license suspended
![]() |
| Rhonda Crawford |
Law Bulletin staff writer
The state Supreme Court late Monday afternoon suspended the law license of former law clerk and current Cook County judicial candidate Rhonda Crawford and enjoined her from taking the oath of office should she win her election.
The high court’s order is final until the justices say otherwise — meaning Crawford will be unable to practice law or serve as a circuit judge until the proceedings before the Illinois Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission run their course.
The one-page order from the Supreme Court is brief, saying Crawford is being suspended under Rule 774. That rule allows for interim suspensions of attorneys and judges while criminal or disciplinary charges are pending.
“The court may make such orders and impose such conditions of the interim suspension as it deems necessary to protect the interests of the public and the orderly administration of justice,” the rule says in part.
The move is a complete rebuke to Crawford, who only days ago asked the high court to give her 14 more days to show cause after she masqueraded as a judge and ruled on three traffic cases in August.
Alternatively, Crawford proposed keeping her license active but prohibiting her from joining the bench right away.
Crawford is facing professional discipline and criminal charges after allegedly donning a robe and adjudicating traffic cases as a judge during Markham Courthouse proceedings in August.
Crawford is set to formally respond to the ARDC’s charges by Thursday. ARDC Chief Counsel James J. Grogan said as of this morning, she has not requested additional time.
The Supreme Court’s order came in response to a petition the ARDC filed last month requesting Crawford’s suspension and prohibition from taking judicial office.
Crawford argued there was “no precedent in this state for an interim suspension being ordered based upon conduct akin to that involved here.”
The ARDC signaled it was amenable to Crawford’s proposal, saying it would agree to an extension of time so as long as she could not take the judicial oath when newly elected judges are sworn in Dec. 5.
Grogan declined to comment on the high court’s order.
At this point, Crawford will still be on next Tuesday’s ballot for the 1st Judicial Subcircuit Hopkins vacancy, and votes will still count for her. She faces no Republican opposition.
But Cook County Circuit Judge Maryam Ahmad, who has mounted an independent write-in campaign for the seat, has attempted to cite Crawford’s ongoing disciplinary matter to have election officials revoke her candidacy. Ahmad’s petition is pending before the state Supreme Court.
For her part, Crawford is also trying to invalidate Ahmad’s write-in candidacy ahead of the election after a Cook County judge ruled she was cleared to run for the seat. Her appeal of that ruling is pending in the 1st District Appellate Court.
Crawford was fired by Cook County Chief Circuit Judge Timothy C. Evans’ office in August for wearing Circuit Judge Valarie E. Turner’s robe and adjudicating at least three traffic cases at the Markham Courthouse. Turner allegedly oversaw Crawford as she handled the cases.
Meanwhile, the Cook County State’s Attorney Office has charged Crawford with official misconduct by a public employee who knowingly performs an illegal act, a Class 3 felony, and false personation of a public employee, a Class A misdemeanor. Crawford has pleaded not guilty.
The ARDC has charged Crawford with dishonesty as a result of handling cases on a judge’s call while dressed and seated like one; criminal conduct of official misconduct and false personation of a public officer; and giving false statements in a disciplinary investigation.
Crawford is being represented in her ARDC case by Mary T. Robinson, a former ARDC administrator and a partner at Robinson Law Group, and Adrian M. Vuckovich, a partner at Collins Bargione & Vuckovich. They did not return requests for comment.
The ARDC case is In re Rhonda Crawford, No. 2016 PR 115.
Full Article & Source:
Candidate’s law license suspended
Thursday, October 9, 2014
3 South Fla. lawyers face disciplinary action
PEMBROKE PARK, Fla. -Florida Supreme Court in recent
court orders disciplined 15 attorneys; disbarring three, revoking the
licenses of four and suspending eight. One attorney received more than
one form of discipline and was also ordered to pay restitution.
Below is a list of the South Florida lawyers who has cases before the Florida Supreme Court.
As
an official arm of the Florida Supreme Court, The Florida Bar and its
Department of Lawyer Regulation are charged with administering a
statewide disciplinary system to enforce Supreme Court rules of
professional conduct for the 98,000-plus lawyers admitted to practice
law in Florida.
**Raymond R. Beitra, 5892 W. 3rd Court, Hialeah.
The
Court granted Beitra's request for a disciplinary revocation, effective
immediately, with leave to seek readmission after five years, following
a June 2 court order. (Admitted to practice: 1992) Disciplinary
revocation is equivalent to disbarment. Beitra had several Florida Bar
disciplinary complaints pending against him regarding contempt, neglect
of client matters and inadequate communication. (Case No. SC13-1290)
**Stuart Carl Hoffman, 1075 Broken Sound Pkwy. N.W., Suite 102, Boca Raton.
The
Supreme Court suspended Hoffman for 91 days, effective immediately,
following a July 25 court order. (Admitted to practice: 1990) Hoffman
was found in contempt for failing to comply with the conditions of a
July 16, 2013, suspension order. Specifically, Hoffman was required to
provide a sworn affidavit to The Florida Bar within 30 days of his
suspension, listing the names and addresses of all persons and entities
that were furnished a copy of his suspension order. (Case No. SC13-2420)
**Tara Renee James, 1835 N.E. Miami Gardens Drive #347, North Miami Beach.
James
was suspended by the Supreme Court until further order, effective 30
days from a July 16 court order. (Admitted to practice: 1996) James was
found in contempt for non-compliance and failure to respond to an
official Bar inquiry. (Case No. SC14-895)
Full Article & Source:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


