Showing posts with label estate dispute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label estate dispute. Show all posts

Friday, November 29, 2024

Kellie Pickler Drags Late Husband Kyle Jacobs’ Parents to Court in Fight Over His Property

By Ryan Naumann


American Idol
alum Kellie Pickler and her late husband Kyle Jacobs’ parents are fighting over his personal property in court, In Touch can exclusively report.

According to court documents obtained by In Touch, Kellie, 38, filed a petition against Reed and Sharon Jacobs, who are the coadministrations of Kyle’s estate.

Kellie and Kyle started dating in 2008 and wed in January 2011. Kyle died on February 17, 2023, from a self-inflicted gunshot wound at the age of 49.

Following his death, Kellie declined to serve as administrator of Kyle’s estate. As a result, Reed and Sharon took over control.

In her petition, Kellie explained that, “A dispute has arisen amongst the parties regarding certain personal property allegedly [Kyle’s] possession prior to his death.”

Kellie’s lawyer said Kyle’s parents created a document titled List of Assets. She said Reed and Sharon “have demanded — via a subpoena issued in the probate estate directed to [Kellie] — that [Kellie] deliver to the possession of their legal counsel.”

The singer’s attorney continued, “Included in the List of Assets are items that [Kellie] either does not have in her possession or over which right, title and possession are disputed.”

Kellie said Kyle’s parents “entered [her] home and obtained items of personal property after [Kyle’s] death.”

The entertainer said her in-laws have not provided her with a list of items they obtained from her home. Kellie’s suit demands Reed and Sharon produce a list of the items. Kellie asked the court to help resolve the fight over the personal property.

The subpoena that Reed and Sharon sent to Kellie included a long list of personal items. The list included Kyle’s gun collection that included three rifles, seven pistols and one shotgun. Other assets on the list included Kyle’s swords, including his Samurai Japanese sword, Rolex watch, Garmin watch, a 1957 J45 Gibson guitar, a McPherson KOA Guitar, a plastic bin of baseball card albums, school awards, a Steinway Grand Model M piano and a viola.

In addition, his parents asked that his work laptop, iPhone and hard drives be turned over.

In response to the petition filed by Kellie, Reed and Sharon accused Kellie of refusing to turn over property belonging to the estate. Further, they said she was “presently in violation of a Subpoena … issued to her for the return of the estate’s property” in the probe case.

Kyle’s parents denied Kellie’s claim that she was either unaware of the location of the items or she disputed Reed and Sharon had the right to the property.

They said, “[Kellie] and her counsel have provided conflicting information regarding the location and rightful possession of the items listed and, as set forth hereinabove, have admitted [Kellie] is in possession of several items of property of [Kyle].”

Kyle’s parents admitted they visited Kellie’s home on one occasion but said it was “at the express invitation of [Kellie] and her counsel whom they met to discuss the transfer of items belonging to the estate.”

Reed and Sharon said they only obtained items held in the garage of the home. They said Kellie selected the items and therefore they would not have needed to provide her with a list of the items taken.

Kyle’s parents said they have Kellie and Kyle’s prenup, which laid out ownership of property. The parents asked that Kelli’s petition be dismissed. The case is ongoing.

As In Touch previously reported, Kyle’s death occurred inside Kellie and Kyle’s Tennessee home. Kellie was home at the time but not in the same room. She woke up and could not find Kyle. She and her assistant called police after they couldn’t open the door to a room.

The autopsy report revealed Kyle did not have drugs in his system at the time of his death.

The report did note that Kyle had a history of “pseudoseizures, gastrointestinal bleeding, elevated liver enzymes, and chronic alcohol use.” Kyle was a successful songwriter who wrote songs for Garth Brooks, Trace Adkins, Jo Dee Messina, Tim McGraw, Clay Walker, Kelly Clarkson and countless others.

In August 2023, Kellie spoke out about her husband’s death. “One of the most beautiful lessons my husband taught me was in a moment of a crisis, if you don’t know what to do, ‘do nothing, just be still.’ I have chosen to heed his advice,” Kellie said. “Thank you to my family, friends and supporters, for the countless letters, calls and messages that you have sent my way.”

Full Article & Source:
Kellie Pickler Drags Late Husband Kyle Jacobs’ Parents to Court in Fight Over His Property

Thursday, June 20, 2019

Death of Texas tycoon James Cotter leads to estate issues

SAN ANTONIO (AP) - Real estate tycoon and cowboy extraordinaire James F. Cotter died as he lived, sowing confusion among the people he loved.

Since his death from cardiac arrest Jan. 25, 2017, his estate has been the subject of much dispute and legal maneuvering among his surviving widow, five children, his lenders, creditors and the IRS.

The San Antonio Express-News reports Cotter died at 83 without a valid will. The bulk of his estate, valued at about $288 million 13 months before his death, comprises a vast real estate empire of 66 properties in six states. In San Antonio, it includes the twin Alamo Towers along Northeast Loop 410 and the two Petroleum Towers just around the corner on Tesoro Drive.

After Cotter’s death, Bexar County Probate Judge Tom Rickhoff appointed San Antonio attorney Marcus Rogers as the independent administrator to oversee the estate.

Rogers called it “the case of a lifetime” but would not discuss it further, saying he considered it a family matter.

The probate case is further complicated by the fact that the Cotter companies’ books were left in disarray, Rogers noted in a March court filing.

The balance sheets reflect “substantial intercompany-related accounts that did not balance and had not been reconciled for what appears to be many years,” he said.

As a result, Rogers added, “balance sheets cannot be relied upon to represent the true book value of the assets, liabilities and equity accounts.”

The loans on the real estate were personally guaranteed by Cotter, so his death “resulted in an event of default on virtually every mortgage,” one court document reads.

The companies that own Petroleum Towers, Alamo Towers and a 36-story Cotter Ranch Tower office building in Oklahoma City, considered the Cotter portfolio’s crown jewel, were put into bankruptcy after his death. The latter two bankruptcies were filed to stop lenders from foreclosing on the properties.

Other Cotter entities narrowly skirted bankruptcy themselves, a lawyer for the companies recently said in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in San Antonio. Many of Cotter’s properties have been put up for sale.

“This is a good example of how you don’t want to exit,” attorney Randall Pulman quipped. Pulman, managing partner of Pulman, Cappuccio, Pullen, Benson & Jones in San Antonio, represented Cotter in a dispute with a janitorial company that sued Cotter and some of his companies for unpaid cleaning services.

Cotter was born “from humble beginnings” in Boise, Idaho, one of his obituaries reads.

Cotter served in the 82nd Airborne Division during the Korean War and attended Walla Walla College in Washington state after leaving the Army. Before graduating, he made his foray into the real estate business by developing a 36-lot subdivision, he told the San Antonio Express-News in 2007.

He later moved to Northern California and bought his first nursing facility under the name Cotter Health Centers.

Cotter was “a self-made man and had very strong religious and Christian principles,” San Antonio attorney Richard Jenkins, who had represented the real estate magnate, said in an affidavit in the probate case last year.

BJ Corp., a cleaning company that sued Cotter and his companies to collect on allegedly unpaid bills, had a different take.

“The Cotter defendants have a reputation for failing to pay their debts when due in an effort to cheat small businesses and to gain an advantage,” BJ Corp. said in its lawsuit.

Cotter was a colorful character, often clad in a cowboy hat and boots, and even required his building security staff to wear similar western attire, The Oklahoman newspaper reported. He bought what’s now known as the 36-story Cotter Ranch Tower, his prized office tower in downtown Oklahoma City, in the 2000s. A bronze statue in front of the building depicts Cotter astride a horse.

“He always had a story, sort of like a mix between visiting with Forrest Gump and the Marlboro man,” Pulman said. “He had a story about all sorts of significant events in history and how he was a bystander.”

Cotter is survived by his third wife, Bettye “Ruth” Cotter, two daughters and three sons.

Cotter’s marriage to his first wife, Loretta, produced three children: Vivian Mueller, 61; James Val Lee Cotter, 59; and Valeri Zaharie Glauser, 53. The couple divorced in 1981 after 26 years of marriage.

Four years later, the then-53-year-old Cotter remarried to a woman more than half his age. The union lasted less than three years but produced his two youngest sons, James Adam Cotter, 31, and James Andrew Cotter, 29.

Why he gave each of his three sons the same first name is somewhat of a mystery.

“He wondered about that himself,” said Ruth Cotter, 81, his longtime companion whom he married in 2012.

For all of his accomplishments in life, Cotter apparently wasn’t much of a planner or very organized. In dying without a will, or at least one that was declared valid, his final wishes for his vast real estate portfolio are unknown.

Even the value of his estate is in dispute.

Cotter’s assets were valued at $287.9 million 13 months before his death, with his real estate holdings representing all but about $41 million as of Dec. 31, 2015, according to a Statement of Financial Condition submitted in the probate case. His liabilities were listed at $181.7 million.

Yet in April 2017, while the probate estate was being contested, Rickhoff wrote a letter to estate administrator Rogers and other attorneys in the case letting them know that he had been informed by another judge who had briefly filled in for him that the “value of this estate is somewhat speculative in nature.”

“In such cases, I often prefer to determine whether or not the estate is solvent and then after the dollar signs in the parties’ eyes disappear and they get realistic about the decisions that need to be made to resolve the real issues in the case, set relevant matters for hearings,” Rickhoff wrote.

The judge then added, “Set everything you want, but I sense a bankruptcy which will stay anything I do anyway.”

Rogers valued Cotter’s assets at $54 million in a May 1 court filing. But that doesn’t take into account what’s owed to lenders and other creditors. It also doesn’t include properties outside Texas that are being worked out in other states. A court filing from last year valued those assets at about $69 million.

Sorting things out has been time-consuming. Ryan Reed, Pulman’s law partner and attorney for Cotter’s two youngest sons, speculated that all the heirs are “slightly unhappy” about how the probate case has been proceeding.

“The family business assets are no longer Mr. Cotter’s to run as he pleases, but now have to be administered to pay taxes, debts and ultimately be distributed to the respective heirs,” Reed said. “It’s simply a different dynamic, and they are all trying to figure out how to transition.”

Cotter’s largest creditor was Loma Linda University, a Seventh-day Adventist health sciences university in California. It’s owed more than $42 million in secured debt on various properties, according to a court filing.

The IRS is owed up to $30 million in estate taxes, Reed said, adding that the agency authorized the sale of some property to pay the estate taxes and keep the real estate business running.

Rogers is “selling properties, but there’s no money coming to me,” Ruth Cotter complained in a recent phone interview. She was receiving a monthly $25,000 “family allowance” from the estate until April. In court papers seeking to continue the payments, she accused Rogers of “engaging in financial dealings” with the estate’s other beneficiaries. Rogers denied the allegations in a brief response filed with the court.

“He was strong-willed and he worked hard,” Ruth Cotter said of her late husband. “And I’d hate to see all of that hard work just go away.”

San Antonio lawyer Jason Davis, who in the probate case represents the three children from Cotter’s first marriage, didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Cotter’s death was unexpected, according to a bankruptcy court document, though he complained of various ailments in a 2014 deposition. He cited heart trouble, diabetes and neuropathy, or damage to nerves that often causes weakness, numbness and pain.

Three weeks after Cotter’s death, Ruth Cotter filed an application asking the probate court to appoint her the temporary administrator of his estate. The five children immediately contested her appointment, contending that they were the sole beneficiaries.

Daughter Valeri Glauser and second son James Adam Cotter wanted to be named the estate’s co-administrators. They also filed a handwritten will that Cotter crafted in 1981 - before his two youngest sons were even born. The will named his three oldest children and his mother, among others, as beneficiaries.

“Being of sound mind, gangled (sic) nerves, and nothing but pitie (sic) on those that read this and especially those that must carry on in my stead. Weep not for me; weep for your selves,” Cotter wrote in the disjointed document.

Ruth Cotter opposed the will. She said her husband left behind a more recent will and provided affidavits from three women who worked at Cotter companies and vouched for the document. If it exists, it has never turned up.

Last June, the parties reached a mediated “Family Settlement Agreement.” Under the plan, one-sixth of the estate - after debt, taxes and other expenses are paid - will be used to fund a trust to support Ruth Cotter for the rest of her life. An independent trustee agreed upon by the parties will administer the trust.

Ruth Cotter said documents Rogers provided during the mediation “were misleading and in retrospect were not a sound basis for a negotiation of such magnitude,” a court filing states. She also contends that other heirs have attempted, through Rogers, “to underfund (her) share with assets that have been significantly overvalued.”

Rogers disputed the allegations. The judge has yet to take up the issue.

Assets awarded to Ruth Cotter include the couple’s Dominion home, some vehicles (he had more than 120, including a 1905 Franklin Runabout), home furnishings and $126,2225 in cash, court documents show.

The Dominion estate was sold last month. It had been listed for more than $1.2 million, but Ruth Cotter said the return was “quite small.” James Cotter had purchased the property on Cotswold Lane from country music star George Strait in 1994, county records show.

“There was quite a bit of debt on it,” Ruth Cotter said, adding that she had to make a lot of repairs. She declined to say where she’s living now.

In August, Rickhoff awarded each of Cotter’s children a 20 percent interest in the property that James Cotter didn’t jointly own with his wife. The children also stand to receive 20 percent of their father’s share of the community property, subject to Ruth Cotter’s share while she’s still alive.

The actual amount each will receive isn’t known yet because the disposition of many of Cotter’s properties is still underway.

Commercial real estate brokerage firm Cushman & Wakefield is selling nine office properties totaling more than 1 million square feet in San Antonio and Houston.

At a May 16 bankruptcy court hearing involving Alamo Towers, attorney H. Anthony Hervol said there were three prospective bidders for the buildings. A sale would require court approval.

Cotter Ranch Tower, the Oklahoma City office building, is under contract to BancFirst of Oklahoma City for $23 million, Hervol said during a recent bankruptcy court hearing. A higher offer could still be submitted. Any deal also requires the court’s approval.

It’s an outcome that Cotter may not have wanted, if his 1981 handwritten will is any guide.

Cotter urged his heirs to “be careful about selling anything.”

“It did not come easy,” he wrote. “I earned it the hard way.”

Full Article & Source:
Death of Texas tycoon James Cotter leads to estate issues

Saturday, August 25, 2018

Probate Judge's Alleged Affair With Opposing Lawyer Exposes Estate Judgment to Challenge

The Texas Court of Appeals has ruled that the losing party in a multimillion-dollar estate dispute can challenge the final judgment in that case based on allegations that the Dallas probate judge who presided over it had an “undisclosed personal relationship” with an opposing lawyer during the litigation.

The case was handled by John Peyton Jr., a former Dallas associate probate judge who entered into a voluntary agreement resigning from office earlier this year in lieu of discipline from State Commission on Judicial Conduct. According to the February agreement, Peyton resigned after the publication of an article in the April 2017 edition of D Magazine called “Ardor in the Court,” which detailed Peyton’s alleged affair with Dallas probate attorney Mary Burdette.

Peyton in his resignation denied the allegations.

After a final judgment was signed in Thomas v. 462 Thomas Family Properties, lawyers for Robert Thomas filed a bill of review before the trial court alleging that Peyton had had a personal relationship with the opposing lawyer during the pendency of the trial, which he did not disclose, that “destroyed the integrity of the proceedings.”

The bill of review seeks to set aside Peyton’s rulings in the case and claims the judge’s alleged misconduct could not have been discovered before the case was resolved in his court. Following a hearing, another Dallas probate court judge dismissed Thomas’ bill of review with prejudice—a decision he appealed to Dallas’ Fifth Court of Appeals.

In its Aug. 2 decision, the Fifth Court ultimately concluded that the trial court erred by dismissing Thomas’ bill of review, noting he couldn’t have known about Peyton’s alleged misconduct conduct in time to file a pretrial motion to recuse the judge within statutory deadlines.

“Assuming appellant’s allegations, as well as reasonable inferences drawn from them, are true, appellant neither knew nor reasonably should have known that the grounds for recusal existed. Thus, a motion to recuse filed after the tenth day before trial would not have been untimely,” wrote Justice Craig Stoddart.

“Applying the notice pleading standard and liberally construing appellant’s petition according to his intent, we conclude the trial court erred by dismissing his petition for equitable bill of review as lacking any basis in law at this early stage,” Stoddart wrote, remanding the case back to the trial court for further rulings consistent with the opinion.

Rob Gilbreath, a partner in Dallas’ Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young who represents Thomas on appeal, is pleased with the decision.

“We believe the allegations of a close personal relationship between the trial judge and opposing counsel during trial justifies a new trial,’’ Gilbreath said.

Robert Dubose and Doug Alexander, partners in Alexander DuBose Jefferson & Townsend who represent appellees 462 Thomas Family Properties, both did not return calls for comment.

Peyton, who now works as the director of probate operations for the Dallas County probate courts, did not return a call for comment.

According to his voluntary agreement to resign from office, Peyton denied the allegations against him in their entirety. The commission initiated an investigation into Peyton’s conduct in February 2017 after receiving a letter from his attorney, Randy Johnston, detailing a “series of events” that he believed would be made public in the D Magazine article.

Johnston did not return a call for comment.

Burdette, whom according to pleadings in the case has not appeared as counsel for the defendants in the bill of review proceedings, also did not return a call for comment.

Full Article & Source:
Probate Judge's Alleged Affair With Opposing Lawyer Exposes Estate Judgment to Challenge