Showing posts with label living wills. Show all posts
Showing posts with label living wills. Show all posts

Thursday, January 30, 2020

A Cautionary Tale About Living Wills

By Dr. Lynn Webster, PNN Columnist
If you become sick and incapacitated, who will decide what type of medical treatment you receive?
Many people don’t want to leave it to chance. They document their end-of-life preferences in an advance healthcare directive – also known as a living will -- believing that will ensure that their wishes are followed.
However, too often that doesn't happen. As The New York Times reported, the language in advance healthcare directives is often unclear, so doctors and family members may not know what their legal obligations are under specific circumstances. Having an advance healthcare directive may also provide a person a false sense of comfort -- if nobody knows it exists.
One woman’s story is an example of how end-of-life wishes can be ignored. “Frances” was estranged from her family, so she asked her longtime business associate, Eleanor, to be her health care proxy.  If there ever came a time when Frances couldn't make her own decisions, Eleanor would do so as proxy. They signed the paperwork, but then Eleanor lost track of Frances.  
After an incapacitating stroke, Frances was placed in an assisted living facility. She suffered from aphasia and, perhaps, dementia. She no longer had a voice in where she was, what happened to her home or what medication she was given. All control of her life had been ceded to an unknown and potentially self-serving guardian.
States can legally give strangers control over a debilitated person's money, home and medical care. Court-appointed guardians are professionals who handle the affairs of the elderly or infirm when there are no family members to take on that responsibility and no paperwork leading to anyone else who is willing to do so.
Guardians may be honest and very much interested in the best for the incapacitated person, but this is not guaranteed. The guardian may have minimal accountability, and the person placed under guardianship can be at the mercy of this individual. Loss and abuse may follow.
A HuffPost article likened this situation to a “con game” that has led to “a silent epidemic of elder abuse.”
According to AARP, court-ordered guardianship "often leads to isolation and exploitation of older Americans." Approximately 1.3 million adults, most of them older than 65, are currently under guardianship in the United States. Frances is one of them. Her story strikes a chord with me, because people of a certain age or those with a disability, can so easily find themselves in that position.  

The Missing Health Care Proxy Document 

A neighbor remembered Frances had once appointed someone named Eleanor (whose last name was unusual enough and whose profile was high enough that she could be found online) as her proxy. The neighbor tracked Eleanor down, hoping she would be able to legally advocate for Frances.  
Eleanor was unable to find her copy of the healthcare proxy document. However, she drove eight hours to the assisted living facility where Frances had been placed and was able to ascertain that Frances was relatively comfortable and safe.  
Eleanor was still worried that the court-appointed guardian had questionable motives for getting involved in the case and was brokenhearted to know that the advance healthcare directives Frances had put in place had not been honored. No one besides Eleanor knew what they were and she was not allowed to participate in the decision-making process.  
"Frances had a will, a trust, a health care power of attorney, and other documents executed. She chose me as her health care proxy because I have extensive experience in finance administration. We'd worked in the same industry for decades and had a mutually trusting relationship. But we both failed to do what we needed to do to be sure Frances's preferences were honored,” Frances explained. 

Difficult Conversations Can Make All the Difference 

At some point in our lives, many of us may find ourselves in a position where we can't communicate our preferences. It can be helpful to think through the type of medical care you will and will not want to receive in various situations, and commit your wishes in writing by filling out your state's advance directive form.  
Unfortunately, if the probate court (or whatever it is in your area) chooses, the judge can set these arrangements aside and institute whatever she or he deems necessary, which usually includes appointing a professional guardian. This is most likely to happen when trustees or guardians cannot be located, so do your best to cover your bases in advance.  
It is important to have conversations with your closest family members, friends and healthcare providers about the medical care you would prefer in the most difficult situations. Give them copies of the paperwork.  
Avoid creating a vacuum that a professional guardian may be ordered to fill by firming up your own support network now—while you still have time.
Lynn R. Webster, MD, is a vice president of scientific affairs for PRA Health Sciences and consults with the pharmaceutical industry. He is author of the award-winning book, “The Painful Truth,” and co-producer of the documentary, “It Hurts Until You Die.” You can find Lynn on Twitter: @LynnRWebsterMD. 

Opinions expressed here are those of the author alone and do not reflect the views or policy of PRA Health Sciences.

Full Article & Source:
A Cautionary Tale About Living Wills

Saturday, May 14, 2016

Survey: Living wills of Incapacitated seniors ignored in guardianship

The South Florida advocacy group that pushed lawmakers to pass current reforms in adult guardianship asked its membership about their legal experiences. The finding gives a snapshot of a very broken system that is very lucrative for a handful of professionals and their attorneys.

The foremost finding of survey is that in more than three-quarters of cases judges ignored advanced directives of seniors and instead appointed a professional guardian, thus rendering carefully planned living wills moot.

Retired Hollywood physician Sam Sugar, who co-founded Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianship, said the survey went out to 285 members and that he received 67 responses from throughout the country.

His group says many professional guardians appointed to oversee the lives of incapacitated adults – a majority of them seniors with dementia – often take financial advantage of these vulnerable citizens and work with attorneys to drain assets and property. As plenary guardians they have complete control over their assets.

In the meantime, the family of these so-called wards find themselves powerless because judges are often complicit and allow the ransacking of the senior’s life savings. The problems in adult guardianship can be found nationwide as more baby boomers live longer their heirs and are more vulnerable to dementia and other degenerative diseases.

The Palm Beach Post in its series, Guardianships: A Broken Trust, revealed the incestuous nature of guardianship and how money from the savings of incapacitated seniors flowed into the household of Circuit Judge Martin Colin through his wife, professional guardian Elizabeth “Betsy” Savitt.

Palm Beach County Chief Circuit Judge Jeffrey Colbath  — in a series of reforms announced in the wake of the series —  transferred Judge Colin out of the Probate & Guardianship Division. Colin announced his retirement.

His wife’s cases were all moved to the North County Courthouse to prevent an appearance of favoritism by Colin’s closest colleagues but she continues to operate.  (Continue Reading)

Full Article & Source:
Survey: Living wills of Incapacitated seniors ignored in guardianship