Tuesday, April 19, 2011

HB2424: There Is Not a Minute to Spare...

Your constitutional rights are under assault as for-profit forces try to preven due process from being applied in new probate law!

"CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE" must be a part of any court reform to protect th rights of the citizens as guaranted by the Fifth Amendment!

If you, or your parents, are over 50 years old and have savings, 401K, retirement, or pensions....this applies to you!

LAW IS BEING MADE NOW...YOUR RIGHTS MATTER!


Call or email Senator Adam Driggs

Phone Number: (602) 926-3016
Fax Number: (602) 417-3007

Email Address: adriggs@azleg.gov



THE RIGHTS ESTABLISHED IN THE US CONSTITUTION BELONG TO EVERY AMERICAN!

YOUR PROPERTY, YOUR MONEY, SHOULD NEVER BE TAKEN BY COURT ORDER WITHOUT DUE PROCESS UNDER THE LAW!

Source:
Courthouse Steps

12 comments:

Haileigh said...

HB2424 will make it! The people won't give up!

StandUp said...

Clear and convincing evidence should be the standard of every state.

Anonymous said...

Let's light up the phone lines to Adam Driggs!

Barbara said...

HB2424 is the people's bill. The people have to stand up for it and insist it passes.

jerri said...

this is what is needed publicity to show the world how our laws are twisted to benefit others good job az keep shouting out loud we hear you we are with you praying for HB2424 to prevail

Thelma said...

In the public interest, HB2424
should pass. Readingi the Senate version is sickening!

"Vexatious litigators," indeed!

Val said...

I commend the dedicated NASGA members of Arizona for all their hard work on HB2424. You will get it passed!

Luis said...

Isn't guardianship supposed to be a good law for the people?

Not the way we're seeing it.

PASS HB2424!

B Inberg said...

I see where some legislators are puppets for those who unjustly profit from guardianship it's all about the money folks. Once a guardianship case is established even if it's a temporary guardianship (there is no such thing as 'temporary') the petition is intentionally fraudulent filled with false information to fool the judge (some judge's don't need much fooking but it looks good on paper and in the transcript) the feeding frenzy begins the clock starts ticking $ tick...tick...tick..

Mary said...

Absolutely - no judge should adjudicate a person incompetent without clear and convincing evidence. There's too much fraud going on, like in the Danny Tate case, as an example.

Go HB2424!

Norma said...

I want to thank NASGA for following HB2424 and supporting this important bill.

Marcie said...

The Consitution, it seems, is almost forgotten nowadays, except when it's convenint.