Dozens of friends and family of victims of Elder Cleansing
have written to your commission and all have received a letter that said that
your agency stating that it was not interested in the obviously criminal
conduct of a small group of lawyers being reported.
Each complaint was essentially the same. A senior citizen was
railroaded into a guardianship in which his/her liberty and property were
confiscated. The looting of the estate was accomplished
by the direct violation of the directive of 755 ILCS 11a – 3 (b) in that the
elderly and/or disabled victim was separated from his/her prior life and family
members who would not attorn to the artificial arrangement and the unjust
enrichment of judicial and other officials. (other officials include
guardians and attorneys). After the looting was complete the
elderly person was subjected to a sometimes drawn out involuntary assisted
suicide.
Some of the citizen complaints that were not investigated and not
acted upon related attorney conduct that is so despicable and wrong that you
dishonor the entire legal profession with your refusal to
investigate. The mining of the teeth of senior citizen Alice
Gore orchestrated by an Illinois lawyer and ignored by your commission is
illustrate of the neglect of duty that you have
exhibited.
The attempt to silence attorneys who speak
out as to corruption in the Courts is another low point in your tenure and is
at the very least the aiding and abetting of the felonies associated with elder
cleansing.
I written to you and your commission before and asked for you to
join in calling for an HONEST intelligent complete and comprehensive
investigation of the cottage industry of elder cleansing and in particular that
which occurred in the case of Mary Sykes 09 P 4585. You of
course have not joined in or conducted any
investigation.
The net was you marshalled your
kangaroo panels and I am suspended for four years for the exercise of my First
Amendment Rights. You then started proceedings against
JoAnne Denison who published on her blog some of my First Amendment
utterances. Currently, Ms. Denison in response to what
appears to be the misreporting of the perjured words and phrases of a Judge you
have continued with your ‘cover up’ by refusing Ms. Denison the audio
transmission of the testimony.
You have accused me of making false statements but have never
articulated a single statement that you claim was or is false. I
challenge you and herewith demand for you to instanter provide me and the
community with a list of each statement that you claim was
false. Then for every statement you
claim was false set forth the basis upon which you claim the statement was
false. The foregoing notwithstanding the Friends and family of each of
the victims of elder cleansing who have written attorney complaints to your
commission want to know why you have refused to investigate the violations of
the civil, human, property, and liberty rights of their loved ones who have
been railroaded into guardianship by Illinois attorneys.
We
would like to know why you are protecting certain attorneys and not
others. Attorney Miriam Solo has been accused by the
family of Alice Gore of what amounts to a human rights
violation. Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmiedel and
other have been accused by Gloria Sykes and the family of Mary Sykes of very
very serious violations of Mary Sykes’ fundamental liberty
rights. This list is endless and each complaining person
wants to know why you are not leading the investigation into the human rights It has not gone un-noticed that there is no ethics statement that
can be found for you. The ethics statements being your disclosure
of assets and liabilities required by the State.
A person
placed in the position of judging the conduct of others should be able and
willing to demonstrate at the drop of hat that he is more virtuous than
Caesar’s wife.
~Ken Ditkowsky
8 comments:
I appreciate you and your efforts very much, Mr. Ditkowsky.
He has my deep respect. Keep giving 'em hell, Ken!
If all lawyers had the character of Ken Ditkowsky, we'd be better off.
Self-policing by lawyers is a sham, scam and farce.
I applaud Ken for not succumbing to their tactics and for never wavering.
Hmmm, you sure shut him up, didn't you, folks?
Unless you plan to repeal the First Amendment, and revoke the internet, you just freed up more time for this attorney to tell it like it is.
Meanwhile, family members, find another lawyer and SUE!!!
It's the only thing that puts a stop to this abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation.
Well, Ditkowsky being able to talk back proves that the First Amendment still exists in some places, now that they've tried to shut him up for obeying the lawyer's oath.
I think this is among the most significant info for me. And i'm glad reading your article.
But wanna remark on few general things, The website style is wonderful,
the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers
Post a Comment