With a new law and a million dollars for implementation, top state
and judicial officials on Friday publicly ushered in a new phase of
reforming the state’s adult guardianship system that aims to find out
how many incapacitated adults in New Mexico are under court protection
and assess whether their finances are safe.
The one-time
legislative funding will pay for staff to sift through about 20,000
court files to find out how many people are under guardianship and
conservatorships, and $300,000 will be devoted to the hiring of three
auditors by the State Auditor’s Office for random compliance audits of
contract guardians working for the state-funded guardianship program for
low-income people.
The Auditor’s Office will also be on call to conduct audits of
guardian or conservator cases referred by judges or, in some cases, by
the public.
“I want you to know that the three branches of
government have come together to solve the problem,” said state Supreme
Court Chief Justice Judith Nakamura, whose court led the reform effort.
She appeared Friday with state Auditor Wayne Johnson, state Sen. Jim
White, R-Albuquerque, state Rep. Daymon Ely, D-Corrales, and state
District Judge Shannon Bacon of Albuquerque.
For years, courts
have placed people deemed incapacitated, such as those with dementia or
brain trauma, under legal guardianship or conservatorships if they are
unable to make decisions about their care or manage their finances.
But
the system, here and around the country, has come under criticism for
lack of oversight by the courts and inadequate accountability, and in
some cases malfeasance, by some professional court-appointed guardians.
Nakamura
said Friday that the Legislature’s “historic” reforms, accompanied by
new court rules, are “significant improvements” that will provide
stricter accountability and greater transparency.
Since the law
took effect July 1, hearings in the traditionally closed guardianship
cases are open to the public and families now have greater opportunity
to view confidential reports filed in their loved ones’ cases, if a
judge allows.
Guardians no longer have “unilateral” ability to limit visitation by
relatives, which Bacon said “created an environment for exploitation.”
Unless a judge decides otherwise, financial bonds will also be required
of conservators managing an incapacitated person’s assets.
Johnson,
who volunteered his agency to help in the reform effort, said, “This is
the beginning of the process. I don’t want you to think that this is
the end of the road.”
A provision in the new law permits audits of
the yearly reports guardians and conservators must file with the court
about the incapacitated person’s welfare and assets and expenditures.
The law also requires expanded reporting, but that will be phased in as
guardians’ and conservators’ annual reports come due.
Random
audits of the 20 or so corporate guardianship firms that work for the
state’s Office of Guardianship will be undertaken this year.
The
audits could include a review of financial transactions undertaken on
behalf of the protected person and a review of any grievances filed
against the contractor. About 900 incapacitated people are served by the
program.
But Johnson said there are legislative fixes needed
before his office can initiate its own audits of guardian/conservator
cases not involving state funds. Asked whether $300,000 is enough to
perform the random audits, Johnson replied, “I hope so.”
He said his audit team will still be able to review cases referred by
the court or for which the court has permitted review. Johnson promised
to make public reports about the audits, removing confidential
information.
Nakamura said the Supreme Court first learned about
the depth of the problem from stories published by the Albuquerque
Journal, which documented the “painful” experience of families whose
loved ones are under corporate guardianships or conservatorships.
“We
all read about the horrors some citizens encounter,” Nakamura said,
including cases “to put it bluntly, that had fallen through the cracks.”
White,
who spearheaded the reform bill unanimously approved by the Legislature
in February, said Friday, “We’ve changed the system, not in great
volumes but in some details. We want to get the word out both for those
doing the guarding and those being guarded.” He added, “We may have to
make further changes in future legislation.”
Ely helped amend
White’s bill for House approval. He said Friday that most guardians and
conservators are dedicated and honest, but added, “This is the beginning
of a process to protect the public from the crooks, the bad people (who
exploit the incapacitated).”
Just a year ago, federal authorities
in New Mexico announced criminal investigations of Ayudando Guardians
and Desert State Life Management, which managed conservatorships and
other accounts for incapacitated people. The U.S. Attorney’s Office
filed fraud and other charges against the principals in both of those
now-defunct firms, who are accused of stealing millions of dollars from
clients.
While technology impediments have kept the courts from identifying
how many guardianship or conservatorship cases are active, part of the
special $1 million funding will pay for a special case review that could
take six months.
Beyond the new law, Nakamura echoed White and others in pledging to continue to make New Mexico’s guardianship system better.
There
is likely to be a need for special funding again next year, Nakamura
and White said, depending on what’s learned from audits and other
reforms.
But, Nakamura added, “We’re in much better shape today than we were last December (prior to the legislative session.)”
Full Article & Source:
Guardianship reforms’ next phase ushered in
1 comment:
I hope so!
Post a Comment