Washoe County Family Court Judge David
Humke was temporarily suspended after he was again accused of
mishandling child support and custody cases within in his department.
Humke,
who’s served on the bench for about three-and-a-half years, was
suspended with pay last week pending formal charges from the Nevada
Commission on Judicial Discipline.
Attempts at reaching Humke for comment were unsuccessful Thursday afternoon.
According
to the order of suspension filed on Nov. 2, the commission found Humke
lacked knowledge over family law, which affected his ability to handle
cases in family court.
The commission also found he had court clerks, attorneys and other parties involved decide matters on certain cases.
Humke
also allegedly set unnecessary status hearings and never entered final
orders in some custody cases, prolonging those cases for years.
He
recently served a three-month suspension without pay and was fined
$1,000 in a separate but similar case. Earlier this year, the
disciplinary commission found he had mismanaged his department, which
had processed about one-tenth of the 700 cases processed by other
departments.
They also found he had failed to discipline a former judicial assistant, who was accused of inappropriate behavior.
Humke
had just returned from serving that suspension when the presiding judge
of the Second Judicial District Court Family Division filed another
complaint against him.
During his absence, Senior
Judge Deborah Schumacher was ordered to oversee family court cases
within Humke’s department. In that time, she found his department had
issued incomplete or incorrect orders in several child custody and
support cases.
She
then told Judge Bridget Robb, who conducted a six-month audit of the
minutes of all the hearings Humke presided over. She looked at the cases
he handled before he was suspended in July.
She
then checked the status of several of those cases and filed a complaint.
At a public hearing last week, Robb testified Humke set status hearings
without making decisions, forcing the people involved to return to
court several times.
She testified many low-income parents were forced to take a full day off work to appear in court.
“Even when (Humke) makes decisions in cases, the
evidence demonstrates that they are often legally incorrect,” the
commission said in the court order.
Humke also
allegedly held trials without ever notifying the parties involved,
“depriving them of their opportunity to be heard,” the court order said.
Last
month, Chief Judge Scott Freeman issued an administrative order, which
reassigned a chunk of Humke’s caseloads, such as divorce and custody
cases, to other family court judges.
Freeman also
assigned Humke a mentor, who then gave him advice. But Humke never
followed that advice when he returned to the bench in October after
serving his previous suspension, the order said.
Robb said Humke didn’t educate himself on family laws. She also accused him of showing up unprepared at his hearings.
“These
failures diminished the public’s respect for the Bench and are an
embarrassment to me, and I believe, to my colleagues,” the order said
Robb wrote in her complaint.
The disciplinary commission has 60 days to submit a formal statement of charges from the time the suspension order was filed.
Full Article & Source:
Judge Humke temporarily suspended pending charges for allegedly mishandling cases
1 comment:
I am glad he's suspended now instead of leaving him on the bench to possibly ruin many other lives.
Post a Comment