A federal district court in Florida has dismissed an insurance
company’s lawsuit against a bank to recover losses it suffered when a
personal injury attorney forged a client’s name on a settlement check,
deposited the check and stole the funds.
The Case
Philip Bradford filed a personal injury lawsuit against the Florida
Philharmonic Orchestra, Robert Williams Moving & Storage Inc. and
Fisher Action Co. Inc.
Bradford’s attorney, Scott Rovenger, entered into a settlement
agreement with the orchestra pursuant to which its liability insurer,
Gulf Insurance Co., agreed to pay $280,000 to resolve Bradford’s claim
against the orchestra.
Gulf issued a check for the settlement amount to Bradford and
Rovenger’s law firm, which Rovenger deposited at Wells Fargo by forging
Bradford’s signature.
Thereafter, Rovenger absconded with the settlement money. Rovenger
subsequently pleaded guilty to defrauding clients and was sentenced to
prison.
Bradford’s lawsuit was reinstated, and the orchestra and Bradford
entered into a settlement agreement at the end of 2017 pursuant to which
Gulf paid Bradford $500,000 in full settlement of his claims against
the orchestra.
Gulf then sued Wells Fargo for negligence, asserting the bank
wrongfully allowed Rovenger to deposit the initial settlement check in
contravention of its own policies and procedures regarding check
depositing.
Wells Fargo moved to dismiss. It argued, among other things, that
whatever claim Gulf may have had against Wells Fargo was barred by the
statute of limitations.
The District Court’s Decision
The district court granted the bank’s motion.
In its decision, the district court explained that, under applicable
Florida law, a negligence action had to be filed without four years from
the time the cause of action accrued. The district court pointed out
that Florida courts have found that the limitations period did not begin
to run until a plaintiff knew or should have known of the injury.
Accordingly, the district court continued, “the determination of when
Gulf knew or should have known that the settlement was fraudulent, and
thus that it had sustained damages,” was “critical to its claim.”
The district court reasoned that once the initial settlement with
Bradford had been vacated based on Rovenger’s fraud, Gulf had been
damaged. This was true, the district court continued, regardless of
whether Bradford’s case resolved by settlement or ultimate judgment,
either for Bradford or the orchestra, because once it was established
that the first settlement was a product of fraud, Gulf knew that it had
paid $280,000 it otherwise would not have paid.
The district court noted that Bradford, through new counsel, moved to
set aside the settlement and to vacate the dismissal based on the
fraudulent settlement on August 16, 2012, and that the state court
granted the motion on Dec. 31, 2012.
Thus, the district court found, as of Dec. 31, 2012 at the latest,
Gulf knew or should have known that it had paid $280,000 it otherwise
would not have, and it was damaged. As a result, the district court
concluded, the four year statute of limitations for any claim based on
negligence expired on Dec. 31, 2016 at the latest, nearly two years
before Gulf filed its case against Wells Fargo, and its claim was
time-barred.
The case is Gulf Insurance v. Wells Fargo Bank, No.
19-cv-60027-BLOOM/Valle (S.D. Fla. March 12, 2019). Attorneys involved
include: For GULF INSURANCE, Plaintiff: Craig Mitchell Greene, LEAD
ATTORNEY, Kramer Green Zuckerman Greene & Buchsbaum, Hollywood; Ryan
Evan Michaels, LEAD ATTORNEY, Kramer,Green, Zuckerman, Greene &
Buchsbaum P.A., Hollywood. For WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant: Amy S.
Rubin, LEAD ATTORNEY, David Andrew Greene, Fox Rothschild LLP, West
Palm Beach
Full Article & Source:
Insurer Loses to Wells Fargo Over Fort Lauderdale Attorney's Trust Account Theft
1 comment:
Wells Fargo has very deep pockets.
Post a Comment