Showing posts with label deceit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deceit. Show all posts

Sunday, January 15, 2023

Ellsworth attorney disbarred by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court


By WABI News Desk

AUGUSTA, Maine (WABI) - An Ellsworth attorney has been disbarred by order of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.

In a December 19th decision, the court determined Christopher Whalley had engaged in professional misconduct that included dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation.

The court further determined Whalley’s misconduct was intentional and violated his duties .

According to court documents, Whalley allegedly took tens of thousands of dollars from the estate of a client.

As a result of his misconduct, Whalley has been disbarred from the practice of law in Maine for at least ten years.

Full Article & Source:
Ellsworth attorney disbarred by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court

Tuesday, August 3, 2021

Judge orders disbarment of Ogden attorney who spent Roy widow's lawsuit settlement

By MARK SHENEFELT

OGDEN — A judge has ordered that an Ogden attorney be disbarred for withholding a Roy widow’s lawsuit settlement, spending it on himself and trying to cover it up when caught.

“Misappropriation of client funds is a particularly heinous charge that undermines the trust and confidence that the public should be able to place in attorneys,” 2nd District Judge Noel Hyde said in ordering the delicensure of Richard H. Reeve. Every time an attorney misappropriates a client’s money, the judge said, “the reputation of the legal profession and the legal system as a whole is diminished.”

The Utah Office of Professional Conduct filed a disciplinary case against Reeve in 2017 alleging he had deposited Jean Tonioli’s settlement share, about $254,000, into his personal credit union account in 2015. Tonioli had won the payout from a drugmaker over her husband’s wrongful death.

Over the next several months, Reeve spent $167,000 of her money on expenses such as trips to San Antonio, Las Vegas and Jackson Hole, Wyoming, plus marriage chapel and wedding ring purchases, according to evidence presented by the Office of Professional Conduct.

After Reeve’s employer learned of the diversion, Reeve provided a “misleading” screenshot of Tonioli’s account to the woman and his employer that “neither revealed he had used her money for his own personal benefit or that he had to obtain money from a separate source to pay her after he was caught,” Hyde wrote in his order, dated July 2.

Reeve “violated his duties to the public and as a professional ... by engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, deceit and misrepresentation” over Tonioli’s money, the judge said.

Hyde said there were instances in the disciplinary bench trial in January when Reeve “was not forthright or truthful.” He determined Reeve’s mental state was “intentional and knowing,” despite Reeve’s claims that he had been under extreme professional and personal pressures in 2015.

Reeve repeatedly lied to Tonioli in 2015 about the settlement by telling her it remained pending, when in fact he had it and was spending it, the judge said.

During a sanctions hearing in May, Reeve said, “I deeply regret the conduct I demonstrated.” He argued there was no lasting harm because he paid Tonioli all she was owed, plus interest. But Hyde said it was “actual injury, serious harm” against a vulnerable victim, no matter that Reeve paid her after his actions were discovered.

In considering aggravating and mitigating circumstances, the factors considered pointed toward disbarment, according to the ruling.

Hyde said it was unclear to him whether Reeve “would have ever paid Ms. Tonioli if his conduct had not been uncovered.”

Hyde also found that Reeve mishandled two other, smaller settlements and violated ethical prohibitions by engaging in a fee-splitting arrangement with his paralegal.

Since Hyde’s ruling, Reeve appealed the decision to the Utah Supreme Court and successfully sought an order from Hyde allowing him to keep practicing law while the appeal is in progress.

Barbara Townsend, who handled the court case for the Office of Professional Conduct, argued unsuccessfully against allowing Reeve to continue practicing during the appeal.

“Mr. Reeve has not demonstrated that his continued practice of law poses no substantial threat of irreparable harm to the public,” she said in a court document. “Moreover, his tendency toward dishonesty suggests that there is a substantial threat of irreparable harm to the public.”

Reeve and Townsend did not respond to requests for comment on the case.

According to the Office of Professional Conduct, disbarments are relatively rare in Utah. There were two in 2020, plus 24 lesser disciplinary rulings. The agency had 515 open cases at the end of 2020.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Timeshare complaints allege deceit, fraud that targets elderly consumers in Myrtle Beach area and across country


NORTH MYRTLE BEACH — Tony and Carrie Mendoza walked into the Wyndham Vacation Resorts office here in September hoping to sell four timeshares they had purchased years ago back to the company that had sold them. They walked out of the office unknowingly owing more than $18,000 to a credit card and finance company they say they’d never heard of.

“Wyndham pulled the wool over our eyes,” said Carrie Mendoza, 80, whose 86-year-old husband, Tony, is a World War II veteran. “The people at Wyndham work with this stuff every day. They talk so fast and flip pages so fast that only they know what’s going on.”

Documents show the Mendozas signed up for a program called Pathway by Club Wyndham – promoted by the timeshare company as an easy way for owners to sell back their unwanted vacation plans and eliminate the monthly maintenance fees. The Mendozas say they do not remember signing the documents, but they do not dispute that the signatures are theirs.

Timeshare critics say in lawsuits filed in Florida, California and other states that the program and Wyndham’s sales techniques are deceptive and target elderly victims.

Read more here: http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/2014/04/05/4143523/timeshare-complaints-allege-deceit.html#storylink=cpy

Full Article & Source:
Timeshare complaints allege deceit, fraud that targets elderly consumers in Myrtle Beach area and across country

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Police Investigate Probate Lawyer Over Disabled Man's Missing Funds

Police are investigating a probate court-appointed lawyer who allegedly tried to cover up his improper handling of a disabled man's finances by filing false accounting statements — as the man's assets dwindled by tens of thousands of dollars over the years.

The Newington Police Department's investigation of Michael Schless, a retired Newington attorney now living in Florida, began after the Aug. 4 publication of a Government Watch column about Schless's longtime role as probate conservator for John Fritz, 64, of Wethersfield, who suffers from cerebral palsy.

Fritz once had assets worth more than $100,000, but now his money market and stock accounts have shrunk to about $20,000 — even though his family says they should have remained stable because his living expenses are covered by Social Security payments and part-time employment.

Newington Probate Judge Robert A. Randich also wrote in a ruling last spring that Schless attempted to "hide his transgressions by filing knowingly false accountings."

Despite that ruling, however, Randich had declined to exercise his option to request a criminal probe, and Fritz's family had been unable to persuade law enforcement authorities to investigate.
That soon changed.

Days after the column appeared, a Newington police detective was assigned to the case. A member of state's attorney's office in New Britain "took notice of [the] newspaper column ... and independently requested that the matter be investigated," according to an Aug. 8 letter to a state prosecutor from David A. Ruth of Bolton, a lawyer representing Fritz's family.

A state prosecutor independently confirmed Ruth's assertion that the police investigation is underway.

Full Article and Source:
Police Investigate Probate Lawyer Over Disabled Man's Missing Funds

See Also:
Deceit, Improprieties By Probate 'Conservator' Deprive Disabled Man Of Inheritance, Court Finds

Monday, August 26, 2013

Police Investigate Probate Lawyer Over Disabled Man's Missing Funds


Police are investigating a probate court-appointed lawyer who allegedly tried to cover up his improper handling of a disabled man's finances by filing false accounting statements — as the man's assets dwindled by tens of thousands of dollars over the years.

The Newington Police Department's investigation of Michael Schless, a retired Newington attorney now living in Florida, began after the Aug. 4 publication of a Government Watch column about Schless's longtime role as probate conservator for John Fritz, 64, of Wethersfield, who suffers from cerebral palsy.

Fritz once had assets worth more than $100,000, but now his money market and stock accounts have shrunk to about $20,000 — even though his family says they should have remained stable because his living expenses are covered by Social Security payments and part-time employment.

Newington Probate Judge Robert A. Randich also wrote in a ruling last spring that Schless attempted to "hide his transgressions by filing knowingly false accountings."

Despite that ruling, however, Randich had declined to exercise his option to request a criminal probe, and Fritz's family had been unable to persuade law enforcement authorities to investigate.

That soon changed.

Days after the column appeared, a Newington police detective was assigned to the case. A member of state's attorney's office in New Britain "took notice of [the] newspaper column ... and independently requested that the matter be investigated," according to an Aug. 8 letter to a state prosecutor from David A. Ruth of Bolton, a lawyer representing Fritz's family.

A state prosecutor independently confirmed Ruth's assertion that the police investigation is underway.

Full Article and Source:
Police Investigate Probate Lawyer Over Disabled Man's Missing Funds

See Also:
Deceit, Improprieties By Probate 'Conservator' Deprive Disabled Man Of Inheritance, Court Finds

Monday, August 5, 2013

Deceit, Improprieties By Probate 'Conservator' Deprive Disabled Man Of Inheritance, Court Finds


A Wethersfield man suffering from cerebral palsy entrusted his affairs to a probate court-appointed lawyer, whose job as "conservator" was to protect his interests and assets. But those assets dwindled by tens of thousands of dollars amid improprieties by the lawyer, who tried to "hide his transgressions by filing knowingly false accountings," a probate judge said in a recent ruling.

John Fritz, 64, of Wethersfield, hasn't been able to get his money back. And his family so far has been unable to get law enforcement officials to investigate.

Meanwhile, Michael Schless, the longtime conservator — who was replaced last December in that role by Fritz's half-brother — has retired as a lawyer and moved to Florida. He said in a brief interview last week that he'd done nothing wrong. "I deny stealing any money," he said.

What happened to Fritz is exactly the opposite of what is supposed to happen when a judge of the Connecticut Probate Court appoints a conservator to manage the affairs — and protect the assets of — someone incapable of doing it himself.

Fritz, who was born with cerebral palsy, asked Connecticut Probate Court 25 years ago to appoint a conservator to manage his finances including an inheritance from his recently deceased mother that ultimately put his assets at more than $100,000.

In voluntary conservatorships like Fritz's, a person who feels he needs such help can ask the probate court to give a "conservator" the power to handle his affairs by managing his finances, paying his bills and making various other arrangements.

Now his money market and stock accounts have shrunk to about $20,000, even though his family says they should have remained stable because his living annual living expenses are balanced out by Social Security payments and income from his limited part-time employment.

The sad story is told in public documents on file at Newington Probate Court.

When Fritz asked the probate court for a conservator, it appointed Schless, an attorney in Newington. The arrangement continued over the decades as Fritz has lived in a Wethersfield Housing Authority apartment building for the disabled and elderly.

Schless, as conservator, submitted annual financial accounting statements to the probate court in Newington.

Schless retired as a lawyer in recent years and moved to Boynton Beach, Florida. But he kept his role as Fritz's conservator (you don't have to be a lawyer to be someone's conservator). Then, last year, Fritz's half-brother and sister-in-law, James and Sharon Imbert of Newington, were shocked to see how little money was left in his accounts.

They particularly did not like the fact that Schless's financial accounting statements showed net annual losses from Fritz's stock and money-market accounts — of $9,333 for 2010, $12,752 for 2011, and $6,181. The Imberts obtained statements from the financial institutions and found that there actually had been a net gain of $1,451 in 2010, a loss of only $456 in 2011, and a gain of $254 for 2012.

They found other problems — including thousands of dollars in payments out of Fritz's account for expenses that were not his. Examples, they said, were $1,074 to American Express, $39 to XM Satellite Radio, and $4.35 to the Sun Sentinel newspaper in Florida.

In cases like this, the probate court approves financial accountings in three-year batches after a hearing. After Schless submitted his reports for 2010, 2011, and 2012, Imbert challenged the accountings and sought the return of $58,147 to the state of his living half-brother.

Full Article and Source:
Deceit, Improprieties By Probate 'Conservator' Deprive Disabled Man Of Inheritance, Court Finds