Showing posts with label freedom from the system. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedom from the system. Show all posts

Friday, April 14, 2023

Senators to Seek Alternatives to ‘Civil Death’ of Guardianship

The US Senate Special Committee on Aging will hold a hearing Thursday to explore alternatives to guardianships, which limit the rights of adults to make their own decisions and can lead to fraud and abuse.
Photographer: Aaron P. Bernstein/Bloomberg via Getty Images

by Ronnie Greene 

When the US Senate Special Committee on Aging gathers Thursday to examine the nation’s fractured guardianship system, one prime focus will be to find ways to eliminate unnecessary guardianships by turning to less onerous options.

Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.), the committee chairman, said that even after Britney Spears’ fight to escape her conservatorship attracted global attention, “there are still countless families across the nation fighting against exploitative or abusive guardianships with little recourse.”

This week’s hearing, Casey said, will explore ways to help those in need without always turning to court-ordered guardianships.

“The Aging Committee will examine the Nation’s patchwork guardianship system and explore alternatives to guardianships to protect Americans’ civil rights while getting them the support they need,” he said in a statement to Bloomberg Law.

A Bloomberg Law investigation published this month revealed the cost of unnecessary guardianships: fraud, abuse, and a system that limits the rights of adults to make their own decisions while handing control to guardians who are rarely certified or regulated. Another investigation, by WLRN in Miami, exposed questionable real estate transactions in a county guardianship program.

One group, Disability Rights Texas, refers to guardianships as “civil death, saying they “not only remove a person’s ability to choose where they want to live, what doctor they want to visit, where they work, or how they spend their money, but they can often be as restrictive as limiting what a person wears, what they eat, or who they talk to.”

Those who find themselves under overly restrictive adult guardianships sometimes take years to escape the system.

In Indiana, a teenager who suffered a traumatic brain injury after a car accident remained under guardianship for years even after marrying, having a child, and gaining work. He needed permission for everything from essentials for his daughter to the type of car he could drive. In Georgia, a mother put her daughter with Asperger’s syndrome under guardianship only to have the judge improperly revoke her right to vote and limit her spending – and threaten the mother with jail time. In Indiana, a woman with autism just ended her guardianship after a six-plus-year journey in which her former guardian questioned the family’s spending while running up steep bills.

Less Restrictive Option

Guardianships are governed by states, but each state has its own rules, so no standard system limits the number of cases guardians can handle. Some take on hundreds of cases at a time. Guardians manage more than $50 billion in assets for those they supervise, experts conservatively estimate.

Across the US, disability rights lawyers, American Bar Association veterans, and state officials say guardianships should be a last resort. Instead, they say, adults with disabilities or impairments should more often enter a system called “supported decision making.”

Under this process, adults retain the right to make their own decisions – while turning to a network of supporters when they need counsel on their relationships, their healthcare, their living arrangements, their jobs, or other matters.

Their supporters could be family members, friends, co-workers, lawyers, or others.

Ruby Campos, a Texas woman who was under guardianship until last year, said she has such a network. She now feels empowered to make her own choices.

“At the end of the day, it’s my decision,” Campos said in an interview. “I make some mistakes every now and then. If my WiFi gets cut off, that’s on me. But we’re healing.”

At this week’s hearing, “Guardianship and Alternatives: Protection and Empowerment,” the committee will hear from witnesses including a licensed therapist, guardianship reform advocate, state guardian attorney, and developmental disabilities director.

Casey has pressed for years for a system overhaul, examining financial exploitation of guardianships in 2018 and, in 2021, joining Sen. Elizabeth Warren, (D-Mass.), in urging federal agencies to improve oversight and seek data on state guardianship systems.

Full Article & Source:
Senators to Seek Alternatives to ‘Civil Death’ of Guardianship

See Also:
Voiceless No More, Indiana Woman Freed From Fraught Guardianship

In the Name of Protection, Part 1: The Profiteers: Guardians' Dark Side: Lax Rules Open the Vulnerable to Abuse

In the Name of Protection, Part 2: The Judges: Judge’s Errors, Jail Threats Haunt Georgia Family’s Guardianship

In the Name of Protection, Part 3: The Profiteers: 420 Cases, One Guardian: System Runs Amok on Just $35 a Month

In the Name of Protection, Part 4: The Lawyers: Peter Max’s Bare Ledgers Show Guardianships Drain Even the Rich

In the Name of Protection, Part 5: Guardians’ Abuses Persist as One State’s Easy Fix Goes Unmatched

Friday, March 31, 2023

Voiceless No More, Indiana Woman Freed From Fraught Guardianship

Sara Abbott said she dreamed of the day she would escape her guardianship. This week, a judge granted her wish.
Photographer: Jim Vondruska/Bloomberg

by Ronnie Greene

An Indiana woman whose journey through adult guardianship was dogged by judicial scrutiny, steep legal fees and a profound sense of powerlessness has gotten her wish: freedom from the system.

More than six years after a judge put her under guardianship, Sara Abbott, 27, was formally removed from her arrangement Thursday—without a hearing—by a new judge overseeing her case.

“It’s finally done,” Abbott said. “It’s going to give me a lot more positive outlook on things. I couldn’t believe it really. I expected another possible big battle.”

Abbott’s experience was profiled as part of a Bloomberg Law investigation of the restrictive world of adult guardianships, In the Name of Protection, published earlier this month.

After Abbott was diagnosed with autism at age 20, professionals suggested her mother, Diana, put her under guardianship. The two live alone in Salem, Indiana.

But when Diana became her daughter’s guardian, she was given no formal training on the paperwork required. The guardianship petition had been approved without a hearing in August 2016, records show. Diana didn’t know, she said, she was supposed to file biennial reports documenting Sara’s care and finances.

In 2021, the presiding judge removed Diana and appointed a local lawyer as a temporary guardian. That guardian questioned the mother’s spending on everything from a used car to a new roof; the judge directed Diana to reimburse her daughter’s account more than $11,000. The two argued the spending benefited both of them because the roof keeps them safe and Diana provided all transportation for Sara, who doesn’t drive.

As the temporary guardian was questioning the family’s spending, she filed bills that, in one eight-month period, totaled 91% of Sara’s total income. Sara said she felt voiceless, requiring permission, for instance, to get her bank statements or host a yard sale to raise money. Ultimately her mother, who previously injured her back, had to return to work.

Sara’s lawyers, Justin Schrock and Amy Semones, filed a petition this week to formally end the guardianship. They said Sara demonstrated independence and doesn’t need a guardian. Sara’s new guardian, Loren Pilcher, also supported ending the guardianship.

A hearing on the petition had been scheduled for Friday. But on Thursday, Special Judge Susan Orth issued a three-page ruling freeing Sara.

Orth also ruled that Diana no longer has to reimburse Sara for spending that benefited them both. “At Sara’s request, Diana is hereby relieved of any responsibility to reimburse Sara’s estate for expenditures made as her former legal guardian and representative payee that have previously been questioned in this matter,” the judge wrote.

“I’m ecstatic,” Diana said. “She has her independence and everything and I thought all along I didn’t owe anything.”

Both said more needs to be done to ensure others aren’t ensnared in unnecessary guardianships. “I honestly think the system is broken,” Diana said. “They need to have somebody explain things. What guardianship is and what it entails.”

But on Thursday, they focused on the ruling Sara called “amazing.”

Diana asked her daughter how she wanted to celebrate.

“Mom, I want Kentucky Fried Chicken today,” Sara replied.

“And that’s what we got,” said Diana.

Full Article & Source:
Voiceless No More, Indiana Woman Freed From Fraught Guardianship

See Also:
In the Name of Protection, Part 1: The Profiteers: Guardians' Dark Side: Lax Rules Open the Vulnerable to Abuse

In the Name of Protection, Part 2: The Judges: Judge’s Errors, Jail Threats Haunt Georgia Family’s Guardianship

In the Name of Protection, Part 3: The Profiteers: 420 Cases, One Guardian: System Runs Amok on Just $35 a Month

In the Name of Protection, Part 4: The Lawyers: Peter Max’s Bare Ledgers Show Guardianships Drain Even the Rich

In the Name of Protection, Part 5: Guardians’ Abuses Persist as One State’s Easy Fix Goes Unmatched