Friday, November 2, 2018

Mother talks about son days after he was killed at a group home

Click to Watch Video
A grieving mother talking about her son, just days after the man who was supposed to be taking care of him, is accused by Mobile Police of killing him.

“We're going to remember his laugh,” said Heather Cox, Matthew Cox’s mother.

Tonight she is holding onto the small moments.

“I spoke to him Friday night and when I talked with him he was like, ‘it's my mom,’” Cox said. “My mom's on the phone.”

Homicide victim Matthew Cox
Her son Matthew died just hours after that phone call.

The police report said investigators believe Trent Yates stomped the victim's abdominal area, causing injury that caused his death. The news tragic for Matthew’s mom.

“We as their families put them there for help, to help them get independence to help them grow and the whole thing all failed,” Cox said.

FOX10 News reached out to the Alabama Department of Mental Health, they said group home operators like, New Way Out, which operated the home where the alleged crime happened, are required to do criminal background checks of employees.

When FOX10’s Tyler Fingert went to get answers on Tuesday why Yates, who has a previous assault conviction was working for them, the doors were locked and they would not come out to talk.

Trent Yates
"I mean it’s really the most heinous kind of crime that you can imagine,” said Dean Waite, the family’s attorney. “Matthew is just like a child, a four year old child and you know you entrust people to take care of children, the elderly, the disabled, not to kill them."

Heather said Matthew had autism and had the mental capacity of a four year old, but as his mom that did not matter.

“Just how happy he was, just how happy and how full of life he was, he enjoyed everything, he enjoyed his music, he enjoyed food, he enjoyed people,” Cox said.

Heather said Matthew had been at that group home since March.

Full Article & Source: 
Mother talks about son days after he was killed at a group home

Editorial: Do your homework. Then vote 'no' on bad judges.

We write a lot about holding police officers, public officials and others accountable for their actions. Does that apply to judges too?

You have to wonder.

Earlier this month, Cook County Judge Joseph Claps was acquitted of a misdemeanor by another judge who refused to “speculate” that the object Claps dropped in the courthouse lobby was a gun.

Two Cook County sheriff’s deputies who witnessed the oopsie testified that it was a gun. Surveillance video backed them up. But Will County Judge Edward Burmila, who was brought in to hear the case, could only shrug after Claps’ lawyer suggested it could have been a water pistol or a cigar lighter or “almost anything.”

Claps, of course, knows what fell out of his jacket. But he didn’t testify, and Burmila let him off the hook.

We don’t think for a minute that this would have been a winning strategy for an ordinary citizen.

Nor do we think it will succeed with the Judicial Inquiry Board, which is investigating. That could lead to discipline by the Illinois Courts Commission. In the meantime, the judge collects a six-digit salary while assigned to administrative duty.

Disgusted? All you can do in this case is trust the disciplinary system to do its job. Now let’s talk about yours.

At the bottom of Tuesday’s Cook County ballot are the names of 59 Circuit Court judges seeking retention. Your job is to decide whether they deserve another six years on the bench. Are you prepared to hold them accountable? Cook County voters have that power, but they rarely exercise it.

Once elected, judges need a 60 percent “yes” vote every six years. The last time voters removed a sitting judge was 1990.

We’re reminded of former Circuit Court Judge Cynthia Brim, charged in March 2012 with misdemeanor battery on a sheriff’s deputy after a disturbing courtroom rant about race, justice and “kahoonas.” She was acquitted by reason of insanity. She’d been suspended with pay for more than two years by the time the courts commission removed her from the bench in 2014.

Voters could have removed her themselves long before that. Local bar associations had rated her unqualified for the bench in 2000, 2006 and 2012, based on a rigorous vetting process that typically identifies a handful of incompetent judges. But too few voters availed themselves of this valuable resource.

You can see the current ratings at voteforjudges.org.

In makings its endorsements, the Tribune relies heavily on that research, as well as interviews with judges and lawyers. This year, we urge you to use the punch numbers provided to vote “no” on Maura Slattery Boyle (228); Matthew Coghlan (232); and Lisa Ann Marino (314). You can read our endorsement here. 

Want to hold judges accountable? Do your homework. Then do your job.

Full Article & Source: 
Editorial: Do your homework. Then vote 'no' on bad judges.

Thursday, November 1, 2018

Trial begins for ex-lawmaker accused of bilking elderly widows

Robert Kenneth Lindell
The jury trial of a former Maine legislator accused of bilking two elderly widows, one in Belfast and one in France, out of more than $3.5 million and of not paying income taxes began Tuesday at Bangor’s Penobscot Judicial Center.

Robert Kenneth Lindell Jr., 53, of Cloverdale, California, is charged with theft by unauthorized taking, a securities violation in connection with the alleged fraud, three counts of theft of federal income tax funds, and five counts each of intentional evasion of income tax and failure to pay Maine income tax.

Lindell, formerly of Frankfort, has pleaded not guilty to all 15 counts. He has been held without bail at the Penobscot County Jail since May after he violated his bail conditions after being free for a year.

Assistant Attorney General Gregg Bernstein told the jury of six men and eight women, including two alternates, in his opening statement that Lindell, a financial adviser who had offices in Bangor and Belfast, gained the trust of both women and access to their finances. Then, between 2010 and early 2017, he allegedly slowly drained their accounts.

“This case is simple. He made unauthorized payments from their accounts to his own, all to finance his lifestyle,” Bernstein told jurors. “In 2013, he paid $425,000 in cash for a ‘fixer-upper’ house in California wine country. He spent another $400,000 in repairs and upgrades.”

The money he took from the women was not reported in his federal or Maine income tax filings, the prosecutor said.

“Mr. Lindell owes thousands of dollars in back taxes,” Bernstein said, but did not give the jury an exact amount owed in his opening statement.

The Belfast widow died in 2012 at age 92, but Lindell allegedly continued to have access to her finances. He is accused of draining nearly $3 million from her estate, which should have totaled about $5.5 million. He is accused of stealing about half a million dollars from the woman in France, who was a longtime family friend, according to Bernstein. She was scheduled to testify Tuesday afternoon with the assistance of an interpreter.

Defense attorney Zachary Brandmeir of Bangor told jurors in his opening statement that Lindell will take the stand and tell them that he did not steal from either woman. In addition, Lindell will testify that while he may have made mistakes in his tax returns, he did not deliberately lie.

“This is about assumption, incompleteness and doubt,” he said. “The only way this case is simple is if you assume the worst of Mr. Lindell. That is what the law tells you not to do.”

Brandmeir said the California house was purchased by one of the Belfast woman’s trusts as an investment and it remained in the trust’s name. The defense attorney also said that many of the payments to his client were management fees that are customary in handling large estates.

The trial is scheduled to end Friday but jury deliberations could go into next week, according to attorneys.

Lindell served in the Maine House of Representatives as a Republican from 2004 to 2006, when he was defeated in his re-election bid.

Lindell’s Maine securities disciplinary record included sanctions in 2002 and 2013. Both actions ended in consent orders, court documents said.

If convicted, Lindell faces up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $20,000 on the most serious charge of Class B theft. He also could be ordered to pay restitution and back taxes.

Full Article & Source:
Trial begins for ex-lawmaker accused of bilking elderly widows

Trial begins for former Frankfort lawmaker accused of bilking money

The trial is underway in Bangor for a former lawmaker from Frankfort, accused of bilking at least $3 million from two elderly women.

Opening statements began Tuesday morning in Bangor in the case of 53-year-old Robert Lindell, Junior. He's also charged with tax evasion.

He's a broker and financial adviser who moved to California in 2014.

He served one term in the Maine House.

The attorney general's office says while still in Maine, Lindell handled the estate of a 92-year-old Belfast woman who died in 2012.

He also managed assets for a woman in her 80's, living in France.

The trial is scheduled to last the week.



Full Article & Source:
Trial begins for former Frankfort lawmaker accused of bilking money

S.F. Moves to Enact Wiener’s Conservatorship Bill

A homeless man is picked up by paramedics on the Embarcadero, April 2018. (Courtesy Image)

A controversial mental-health bill that entered the State Senate earlier this year may have found its home in San Francisco. SB 1045, authored by Senator Scott Wiener, would grant authorities the right to take away someone’s rights if they are frequent users of the city’s hospital, jail, and psychiatric wards. 

Supervisor Rafael Mandelman introduced a local bill nearly identical to Wiener’s at a Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday. Under the legislation, a person would meet the new conservatorship criteria if they are homeless and are a high utilizer of emergency departments, have a history of frequent incarceration due to behavior resulting from severe mental illness or a substance-abuse disorder, or a history of 5150 holds. 

“I see this as a start of a conversation for our city, and I look forward to collaborating in the weeks ahead with stakeholders, advocates, and key city departments to make this program as effective as possible,” Mandelman said. “We can’t allow our neighborhoods to serve as open-air mental institutions, our jails as shelters, and our hospitals as a temporary way-station between the two. It’s not humane and it’s not the response of a civilized government in one of the wealthiest cities in the world.” 

Wiener, Assemblymember David Chiu, and Mayor London Breed also support the bill. 

“Conservatorships we know are a challenge, and we are going to continue to engage all stakeholders on finding solutions for the purposes of helping this population,” Breed said Tuesday.

But despite the support of many politicians, the bill has failed to win the support of many of the aforementioned “stakeholders,” including independent health centers and homelessness organizations in S.F. Some adamantly oppose it. 

“There has not been any showing of current barriers in existing law or practice that prevent counties from providing the care and services they propose with this bill,” Mary Howe, executive director of the Homeless Youth Alliance, says. “SB 1045 does not propose a solution that meets the sponsors’ goals of addressing homelessness and the need for behavioral health care. San Francisco is already failing and unable to meet the housing and medical needs of the very people this bill seeks to help.”

Dr. Vitka Eisen, president and CEO of HealthRIGHT 360, is concerned that the main change in conservatorship law expressed in SB 1045 was the specific inclusion people who use drugs. The current law is limited to those who abuse alcohol. 

“We’re coercing treatment for substance use in a way that has not actually been done,” Eisen tells SF Weekly, noting that the only way to do that currently is through a court order. 

“This is in fact a level of coercion that has not previously existed,” she says. “I have pretty deep concerns about that. That being said, I truly do understand the tremendous challenges faced by people who have a substance-abuse disorder related to methamphetamine. Those people who suffer from that condition exhibit behaviors that appear to be pretty self-destructive. I want to believe that the people that are putting this legislation forward want to approach this same condition with compassion. But what else can we do before we step over and coerce people into substance-use treatment?”

Other health organizations have also expressed skepticism over the legislation. According to the Examiner, groups such as the San Francisco Mental Health Board, the Mental Health Association of San Francisco, and Senior and Disability Action — which were only invited to speak with politicians three business days before the bill was scheduled to be introduced — expressed everything from concern over the speed with which this was moving to fears it was taking a big step backward and criminalizing the mentally ill.  

The number of people affected by the conservatorship bill vary depending on who you talk to. Simon Pang, captain of the San Francisco Fire Department EMS-6 team, which responds to the regular high users of 911 services, says he estimates “less than 10 individuals have such severe substance-abuse disorder and mental disorganization that they cannot perform routine acts of daily living.” In contrast, the city’s Department of Public Health says somewhere between 50 and 100 people would qualify. Earlier this year, Wiener said it would apply to “only a tiny percentage of people on our streets — perhaps 1 percent of the population,” which, if the annual homeless point-in-time count is accurate — hint: it isn’t — would be 75 people. 

Currently, the above numbers also only apply to unhoused people living on our streets. In the new legislation, that’s changed.

“When we initially introduced the bill, it was limited to chronic homeless,” Wiener tells SF Weekly. “We did that to try to make it a little more targeted, but that requirement was removed. There are groups who are marginally housed who are also in crisis, although most people who have the ability to pay rent are probably less likely [to qualify].”   

This puts a slight damper on the concern that conservatorship would only apply to people without homes, adding to the litany of ways in which San Francisco criminalizes homelessness. 

After all, as Howe points out, “If someone is required to be confined for their own safety, then one’s housing status is irrelevant.”

With the introduction of SB 1045 this week, the city faces a conundrum. The mental and physical health crises on our streets are absolutely unacceptable, but is this the right path? As the Department of Public Health states, 12 percent of the unhoused people who accessed health services last year accounted for 74 percent of the department’s costs. And if that’s true, then housing appears to be the obvious answer. With Nov. 6 right around the corner, it’s odd that these politicians aren’t standing up for Proposition C, which would double their homelessness budget. 

“I know everyone up here is supportive of the need to build up our funding for responses to homelessness,” Mandelman said at a conservatorship press conference Tuesday, as he stood next to Chiu, Breed, and Wiener. 

If only that were true.

Full Article & Source:
S.F. Moves to Enact Wiener’s Conservatorship Bill

Advocacy group says it found 49 substantiated cases of abuse, neglect at ID treatment center


The Southwest Idaho Treatment Center (SWITC) in Nampa provides residential care to people with developmental disabilities and mental illnesses. It is run by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. Katherine Jones Idaho Statesman file

Read more here: https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/community/canyon-county/article220782360.html?fbclid=IwAR3y_YeCmISaH69L_Mwrnu53mwh392pvM2epFUkqsUI_B6azDC3vz1t8y1I#storylink=cpy

An advocacy group in Idaho has released a 114-page report that says the Southwest Idaho Treatment Center in Nampa for people with disabilities has again shown failures and neglect in its care for clients.

In some cases, people with disabilities were reportedly told they could not talk to their guardians about the abuse, according to DisAbility Rights Idaho, an advocacy group for people with disabilities.

The nonprofit made its announcement about the yearlong investigation into reported abuse and neglect during a Monday press conference. The advocacy group reviewed 70 investigations that occurred from Jan. 1, 2017, to Jan. 31 this year. The group said it found 49 substantiated cases of abuse or neglect.

DisAbility Rights Idaho titled its report on SWITC “No Safe Place to Call Home.” The group’s executive director, Jim Baugh, said that because the group has federal authority to do secondary investigations of abuse or neglect involving people with disabilities at an institution, they made the report findings public.

The Idaho Statesman previously requested copies of the SWITC investigations through a public records request, but it was denied those documents.

The nonprofit reviewed 20,000 pages of investigations at the treatment center to identify problems and make recommendations to the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, the agency that runs SWITC. The group found that at least 14 residents were victims of confirmed abuse or neglect.

“In a facility with only about 23 residents, these are appalling numbers. In our opinion, these point to systemic failures,” Baugh said.

DisAbility Rights Idaho provided a copy of its report to Health and Welfare on Oct. 1, and the department did respond, saying many of the problems the group outlined were outdated and have since been changed.

Health and Welfare disputed some of the claims in the report, and said the department has already changed policy on some of the recommendations from DisAbility Rights Idaho. Health and Welfare’s response stated the report has “methodological flaws” and “while some of the report’s recommendations are worth considering, others suffer from the limited investigation and lack of expertise.”

DisAbility Rights Idaho did make the department’s full written response public in its report.

“Contrary to what the report says, we first notified media and the public in August 2017 when we identified inappropriate and abusive employee behavior that was not meeting our standards,” the Department of Health and Welfare said in a press release Monday in response to the report. “We launched an extensive internal investigation into the allegations. As a result, six employees were terminated. However, the Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office declined to file criminal charges based on the Nampa Police Department investigation.”

What is SWITC?


The Nampa facility is home to about two dozen clients who have developmental disabilities or mental illnesses. The facility is supposed to prepare them for care in the community, but many clients end up cycling in and out or staying for long periods of time.

SWITC has faced whistle-blower lawsuit threats from former employees or patients’ families because of neglect. In 2018, inspectors threatened three times in six months to take away SWITC’s ability to treat Medicaid patients because of failed inspections.

In its press release, the Department of Health and Welfare said a survey team reviewed many of the abuse investigation reports from 2017 and 2018.

Full Article & Source:
Advocacy group says it found 49 substantiated cases of abuse, neglect at ID treatment center

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

NMS nursing homes banned from Maryland for alleged patient dumping


Click to Watch Video
A company that operated five nursing home facilities in Maryland accused of dumping residents who couldn't pay will have to pay millions of dollars to the state.

Vonda Wagner became a victim of patient dumping and said it was a terrifying experience. She now lives in an east Baltimore apartment. She's had a stroke. Because of a tracheotomy operation, she cannot talk, but the words she writes speak volumes about patient dumping.

"It was scary. I come from a town that had 600 people," she wrote.

When her health insurance coverage ran out, she lived in a Hagerstown nursing home. It was accused of bringing her to Baltimore and placing her in an unlicensed assisted-living facility, which eventually left her on a downtown street.

"I couldn't talk and you hear things about muggings. I couldn't scream for help," she wrote.

Maryland attorney General Brian Frosh said his office took the nursing home's parent company NMS LLC to court, claiming it engaged in unfair, unsafe and unlawful discharge practices, evicting hundreds of residents from its five facilities across the state.

"These are very bad accusations. they were dumping patients in homeless shelters, unlicensed assisted-living facilities, and they were endangering the health and lives of the people they were supposed to be treating," Frosh said.

Frosh said NMS agreed to pay a $2.2 million settlement and now is prohibited from operating nursing homes in Maryland.

"Putting them out of business, making sure they can never get back into the business and socking them with a $2.2 million fine send, I think, a strong message, not just to them, but to the rest of the folks who are treating our most vulnerable citizens," Frosh said.

Vonda now has a care taker.

"(I) make sure she takes her medicine, which isn't easy sometimes," said Doug Haller, her caretaker.

She has patiently waited for this outcome from the attorney general. She wrote, "It's about time. I want to thank him and his crew."

NMS is dropping a federal lawsuit against the Maryland Department of Health.

Full Article & Source:
MS nursing homes banned from Maryland for alleged patient dumping

Md. gets $2.2M in settlement with nursing-home operator over evictions

WASHINGTON — The State of Maryland has settled a case against a nursing-home operator accused of “resident dumping” — the unwarranted eviction of elderly residents in an attempt to get more money from the government.

The office of Attorney General Brian Frosh announced the settlement Friday with Neiswanger Management Services, which operated five nursing facilities in the state, and its owner, Matthew Neiswanger. The company, which stopped operating nursing homes in February of this year, is now permanently “precluded” from doing so, and can no longer be a Maryland Medicaid provider. The company will also pay the state $2.2 million and drop a lawsuit against some workers at the state Department of Health.

Frosh’s office said in the statement that the company issued eviction notices to hundreds of nursing-home residents for supposed nonpayment, although the residents in fact were paid up.

The company did this when their facilities were at full capacity, and did so because the residents were on Medicaid and the company wanted to replace them with people whose care would be paid for by Medicare, which typically pays more, Frosh’s office said.

The company sent out at least 1,061 eviction notices between Jan. 1, 2015, and May 31, 2016, more than twice the number issued by Maryland’s other 225 licensed nursing homes combined, the attorney general’s office said.

Many evicted residents were “dumped … in homeless shelters and predatory unlicensed assisted living facilities, where they faced financial exploitation and abuse,” Frosh’s office said.

Full Article & Source:
Md. gets $2.2M in settlement with nursing-home operator over evictions

Friend Opposes Bid by Actress’ Son For Permanent Conservatorship

A longtime friend of actress Nichelle Nichols filed court papers objecting to the appointment of her son as the permanent conservator of his mother’s estate, saying he may sell the former “Star Trek” star’s Woodland Hills home and place her into assisted living without her consent.

Actress/producer Angelique Fawcette also says that she has only been allowed to visit Nichols once since the actress’ son, Kyle Johnson, filed his conservatorship petition earlier this year. Both sides agree Nichols has suffered memory loss, but Fawcette maintains it is less severe than what Johnson is alleging.

On Sept. 10, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Barbara Johnson named 67-year-old Johnson — who is not related to the judge — as the temporary conservator of his mother’s person, and Marina del Rey psychologist B.J. Hawkins as the temporary conservator of the actress’ estate to manage her financial matters pending a trial on permanent conservatorships.

Fawcette alleges in her court papers that Johnson is anxious to sell his mother’s home so he can put her into an assisted living facility. Fawcette’s attorney, Troy Martin, said his client will fight such a move.

“Ms. Fawcette intends to continue her efforts to ensure that the court abides by Ms. Nichol’s wishes to remain in her home and to continue doing what she loves by interacting with her fans,” Martin said.

Both (Nichols) and Fawcette “have an inalienable right to carry on a close and loving relationship without interference,” Fawcette maintains in her court papers. “Since the filing of the original petition, Fawcette has been allowed to visit with (Nichols) once, in a meeting that was arranged by … Hawkins.”

Nichols “has a very supportive and loyal fan base” and “takes great pleasure in being in the company of her fans and very much enjoys attending `Star Trek’ conventions,” according to Fawcette’s court papers.

While Fawcette opposes Johnson’s petition, she is asking that Hawkins be named conservator of Nichols’ estate and her person if the judge believes permanent conservatorships are necessary. A hearing is scheduled for Nov. 8.

Most of Nichols’ assets are in her Woodland Hills home, which is worth nearly $2 million, according to her son’s court papers.

Nichols played Lt. Uhura, a translator and communications officer, aboard the USS Enterprise in the “Star Trek” series that ran on NBC from 1966-69, and also appeared in some of the later “Star Trek” movies. She and Fawcette met in 2012, according to Fawcette’s court papers.

Full Article & Source:
Friend Opposes Bid by Actress’ Son For Permanent Conservatorship

See Also:
‘Star Trek’ Actress Court Battle: Judge Won’t Go

Star Trek ‘Lt. Uhura’ on 1960s TV Now Target of Court Battle Over Conservatorship

Star Trek‘s Nichelle Nichols Goes to Court Over Guardianship Issues