Showing posts with label Baker Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Baker Act. Show all posts

Friday, September 22, 2023

2 years after patient dies with high levels of drugs, family still unable to get answers

Jimmy Johnston spent a year in the hospital under Baker Act and guardianship

In January of 2022, the ABC Action News I-Team reported how Jimmy Johnston was involuntarily committed, placed in guardianship and spent more than a year in Morton Plant Hospital as his family fought to get him out. He died in the hospital, and a toxicology report showed high levels of drugs were in his system when he passed. Since then, I-Team investigator Adam Walser has been following his family’s ongoing search for answers and accountability.

By: Adam Walser

CLEARWATER, Fla. — In January of 2022, the ABC Action News I-Team reported how Jimmy Johnston was involuntarily committed, placed in guardianship and spent more than a year in Morton Plant Hospital as his family fought to get him out.

He died in the hospital, and a toxicology report showed high levels of drugs were in his system when he passed.

Since then, I-Team investigator Adam Walser has been following his family’s ongoing search for answers and accountability.

“You can imagine the sadness here”

“The first thing I did was call Clearwater police,” said Kathleen Johnston, writing with a marker on a poster board.

She documented the many twists and turns in her family’s search for answers about her brother Jimmy Johnston’s death.

“This is just a small sample of the papers and the hoops we’ve been going through to get some justice for Jimmy,” Kathleen said, pointing to files of documents related to contacts she had with local and state governments.


Jimmy, a U.S. Navy veteran who struggled with schizophrenia, died alone after spending a year in Morton Plant Hospital while his family fought in court for his release.

“You can imagine the sadness here of us having to do this,” Kathleen said.

Kathleen’s sister Patty and brother Tommy share in the sadness.

The siblings all live in Indiana and can’t sue the hospital because Jimmy didn’t have a wife or any children.

“That’s not the issue. The issue is, why did they do this to him?” said Tommy.


Full Article & Source:
2 years after patient dies with high levels of drugs, family still unable to get answers

Wednesday, January 5, 2022

Can Baker Act Patients Refuse Treatment?


The Baker Act empowers police officers, physicians, and family members to commit someone to a 72-hour involuntary mental health examination. Both children and adults can be (Baker Acted), and the experience is horrifying for everyone involved.

Something article is meant to provide an overview of what to expect if this occurs to a person, but keep in mind that Baker Act proceedings run quickly, and baker act lawyers know this. Keep in mind, speak to an attorney as soon as possible to examine your legal options.

A Justifiable Cause

If a doctor or an officer believes that an individual has a mental illness that requires an involuntary mental health evaluation, the individual may be Baker Acted.

  1. The individual has denied voluntary evaluation or cannot determine if the test is necessary.
  2. If treatment is not offered, the individual may suffer from neglect.
  3. If the sickness is not treated, it may result in physical or emotional harm to them or others.

Can A Person Refuse Treatment?

If anyone you know has been Baker Acted (placed in a psychiatric facility for an involuntary mental health examination), one of the most frequently asked questions is whether the patient has the right to refuse psychiatric medication. This is a common question by parents who are unsure about giving their young children psychiatric medicines. The solution to this issue is more complicated than it appears on the surface.

The Constitution protects an individual’s right to refuse medication and other forms of medical care, including parents’ right to refuse to medicate their children. The right is derived from the concept of “substantive due process” and constitutional protections for adults’ privacy. The right of a parent or legal guardian to refuse medication for their children is founded on the most fundamental safeguards offered to parents about care and child-raising decisions for their children. The exception is if the sick person poses a danger to himself or others.

Incapacitated Individuals

When an adult is judged incapable of making health care decisions and a guardian advocate is appointed, the guardian advocate makes prescription decisions on the patient’s behalf. A family member, legal guardian, or friend may ask the court to vacate these decisions.

The Irony Of Medications

There are reasons to be cautious in prescribing psychotropic medications based on the patient’s unique circumstances, diagnosis, and needs. There are more aspects to consider, which many people are unaware of. Antidepressant efficacy has been substantially questioned during the last decade. While these medications may be beneficial for a small number of persons, typically those with really severe and intractable symptoms, they are ineffective for the great majority.

Antipsychotic medications or mood stabilizers, as they are usually referred to, are also a risk. These are the most often prescribed drugs for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder people. The issue is that younger children, particularly those under the age of 14, cannot receive an accurate diagnosis for either of these disorders. Many factors can trigger bipolar behavior, and medicating a child might impair their brain and physical development.

Full Article & Source:

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Lee Co. judges have to be present at Baker Act cases

Lee County judges have been ordered by the Florida Supreme Court to appear in person for Baker Act hearings.

The practice was halted in April when a judicial assistant for Judge Andrew Swett announced via email the judge would no longer be commuting to SalusCare and Park Royal Hospital but would instead chime in via a television screen.

The hearings in question relate to people who have been involuntarily committed for mental health reasons. The Baker Act, or the Florida Mental Health Act, is used to commit someone for 72 hours.  After three days, the individual can be released or the hospital can order a hearing where a judge decides whether to commit the individual for a longer period of time.

Kathy Smith, public defender for the 20th Judicial District, asked the court to intervene on behalf of people with mental disabilities.

The issue went to the Supreme Court after a panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled in September that nothing bars a Lee County judge from appearing via a screen in Baker Act cases, according to the News Service of Florida.

Kathy Smith, public defender - 20th Judicial District.
"We had found, as the attorneys of record, that conducting hearings in this fashion over video is very distressing to some of our clients that are experiencing auditory and visual hallucinations," Smith said.

The hearings held through screens left her clients wondering what was real and what wasn't' real, said Smith, who serves on the Supreme Court Task Force for Mental Health and Substance Abuse.

"When they are having those concerns it makes it all the more difficult for us to tell their story," she said.

Mental heath advocates, including the Disability Rights Florida Inc., filed a brief on arguing that appearing electronically was inappropriate in these cases.

A decision allowing for judges to telecommute would be adverse to people who have mental disabilities, the group states.

"They are one of the most vulnerable populations that we deal with as lawyers and sometimes that means going the extra mile to make sure they understand what's happening," Smith said. "It's important."

The court began to use telecommuting in mental health facilities "for the purpose of promoting efficiency, time management of limited judicial resources, and security concerns," said Sara Miles, public information officer for the 20th Judicial Circuit.

Judge Andrew Swett
Miles said it's important to note the law doesn't prohibit judges from using technology to appear remotely in these proceedings.

The technology used for appearing via teleconference is state-funded and "allows for clear visual and audio contact," Miles said.

"Due process is preserved," she said, adding that the patients receive prompt timely hearings.

A final decision has not been made by the Supreme Court, but until then Judge Swett will have to commute to the hospitals for the Baker Act hearings.

Full Article & Source:
Lee Co. judges have to be present at Baker Act cases

Thursday, April 7, 2016

Joe Roubicek: Joe's Cases: Shanghai'd For Profit

“Shanghai” refers to a time when sailors were taken either by force, the use of drugs, or liquor. This case is about someone shanghaied by a predator and the health care system, while it prevails today in a different form called “Isolate, Medicate and Take the Estate.”

It was New Year’s Day, 1991 when Christine Cobb, a 64-year-old retired postal worker, cried with relief. This was her first day of freedom from the Broward General Hospital’s psychiatric ward. She had been drugged, sedated and under observation after being committed using a Florida law called the “Baker Act,” which allows a person who may be dangerous to him/herself or others be held involuntarily for 72 hours.

Her problems began two months earlier when she moved into an unlicensed adult living facility (ALF). Just a one-story house owned and operated by 29-year-old Jennifer Smith, a former employee of the state’s Adult Protective Services agency who was very familiar with the procedures that regulated group homes in Florida. Before that, she was a bank teller with a good understanding of check-cashing procedures. She appeared to be a polite and pleasant woman, but Christine found otherwise.

Jennifer Smith began by stealing Christine’s purse and reporting to police that both of their purses, identifications and checkbooks, had been stolen. She lied about having her own identification stolen because as a former bank employee, she believed that she could still use her identification to cash stolen checks while claiming the “thief” had done it.

When Christine Cobb demanded her purse be returned, Smith insisted that she was imagining things, or delusional. Christine was outraged!

The nightmare worsened. After Christine served her purpose, she was handcuffed and led away to the psychiatric ward by police, because Jennifer Smith had Baker Acted her. Christine cried foul, infuriated with Smith and her lies, but no one would listen. The more upset she became, the more they restrained and drugged her and eventually she became despondent.

While Christine was drugged and confined, Smith began forging and cashing the victim’s checks for over $10,000. Smith used her own identification, confident that she could later insist that the thief who had stolen her ID had cashed the checks but ironically, the same bank tellers she once worked with identified her for police.

For unknown reasons, Christine was held for observation for 30 days instead of the customary 3 days. Healthcare workers later admitted there never was any basis for committing her while the state of Florida (the taxpayers) paid for Christine’s hospital stay.

Full Article and Source:
Joe's Cases:  Shanghai'd for Profit

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Tonight on T.S. Radio: Elder Abuse: NM Passes "Baker Act"



Join us this evening as Leonie Rosenstiel returns to up date us on the passage of New Mexico’s version of the “Baker Act”.

This law in tandem with the new DSM 5, will enable the labeling of any individual as “mentally ill”. The DSM 5 contains 292 fictional mental disorders for which there is no medical test, no science, and no evidence that the disorders exists other than they said so.

This bill will be used to target, incarcerate and hold hostage elderly individuals with assets. The holding period will be used to create what most likely will be fictional disorders that will allow the granting of predatory guardianships and will open the doors to the looting of the estate. All to benefit the ward, of course.

B 271
EMERGENCY MENTAL HEALTH EVALUATIONS
Sponsor: Mary Kay Papen
This bill will facilitate the theft of estates, especially to those who are elderly w/assets, in New Mexico. The bill gives blanket access to estates via the labeling as mentally ill, those who own the estates.

5:00 PST … 6:00 MST … 7:00 CST … 8:00 EST

LISTEN LIVE or listen to the archive later

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Tonight on T.S. Radio: Guardian Abuse: Laws Protecting Predatory Guardians

This evening we will be focused on upcoming laws in New Mexico that will make legal (not lawful) the grip of predatory commercial fiduciary's one year after death of the elder victim. Evidently this law is needed in NM due to the predators inability to loot the total estate prior to death in many cases.

Leonie Rosenstiel will join us from New Mexico to talk about the ongoing efforts in that state to legalize the theft of estates by "commercial guardians" and to allow New Mexico family and probate courts to continue holding secret meetings which adversely affect the targeted victim. These secret court proceedings are used to violate the rights of the victim and the extended family.

5:00pm PST ... 6:00pm MST ... 7:00pm CST ... 8:00pm EST

LISTEN LIVE or listen to the archive later

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Tonight on T.S. Radio: Hastening End of Life






Join Marti Oakley and Beverly Newman for a discussion this evening on the "hastening of end of life" In addition we will be discussing the Baker Act of Florida.

5:00 PST … 6:00 MST … 7:00 CST … 8:00 EST

T.S. Radio:  Hastening End of Life