Judge Calls Jared E. Shafer's Libel Suit "Acrimonious" and "Contemptuous"

Clark County District Court Judge David Barker on August 12, ordered all parties in a two year long libel lawsuit to resolve their differences in Court-Mandated Mediation.

He stayed all other proceedings in the case brought by for-hire guardian Jared E. Shafer, pending Court-Mandated Mediation which will take place in the next 30-45 days.  He also, on the record, explored a resolution of the case which would allow Defendants Rebecca Schultz and Charles Pascal a way out of the suit without admitting liability or paying anything to Plaintiff Shafer, et al.

Judge Barker referred to Shafer's lawsuit as "acrimonious" and "contentious," then asked Shafer's lawyers Alan Freer and  Ross Evans what their client's ultimate goal was in suing Schultz, and Pascal, who is indigent and legally blind?  Freer responded "My client's bottom line is to remove the 108 defamatory RipOff Reports.
    
Attorney D. Brian Boggess, appearing for Schultz, quickly responded that his client did not author the reports.

Judge Barker stated, "I can make that happen," saying that if the parties agree to Court-Mandated Mediation, he will issue a Court Order to RipOff Reports to remove the postings.

Mediation is a process whereby a neutral judge is asked by the trial judge to facilitate resolution between two or more parties. Freer and Evans accepted Judge Barker's Order without protest.

The Judge then asked Pascal, a pro-se Defendant who appeared telephonically, to make a one sentence statement as to whether he objected to the removal of the 108 RipOff Reports.

Pascal replied: "I did not author any of the RipOff Reports that are the subject of this lawsuit, your honor, so of course I don't object to their removal."

Judge Barker then asked attorney Boggess whether his client Rebecca Schultz had any objections to the removal of the 108 postings?

Boggess replied: "My client has never authored a RipOff Report about Mr. Shafer or any of his associates, so she has no objection to the postings being removed." This prolonged lawsuit, which has often been described as a good example of a "SLAPP suit," i.e., strategic lawsuit against public participation was brought against the families of two of Shafer's former "wards" who both claimed he converted hundreds of thousands of dollars from their loved one's trust accounts for his own use without rendering an accounting of how the funds were kept or utilized.

Shafer in 2012 accused Schultz and Pascal of conspiring to post the 108 allegedly defamatory articles about him on the Internet, but has been unsuccessful in proving they conspired, were the authors, or in stopping subsequent postings by anonymous authors.

Coincidently, many of the allegations in the 108 RipOff Reports about Shafer, et. al. are also being alleged in a 15 page Federal Civil Racketeering law suit filed in United States Federal Court on Friday, August 8, 2014, by 95 year old Guadalupe Olvera, a former "ward" of Shafer, and highly decorated WW 2 veteran.  Olvera is the father of Rebecca Schultz, and is also being represented by attorney Brian Boggess.

The Mediation is expected to occur within 45 days and be administered by Judge Jerry A. Wiese.  Pending the Court Order to remove the subject RipOff Reports, no further action is anticipated in this case.

Source:  Update from Steve Miller

READ the RipOff Reports

READ the 15 page lawsuit

Las Vegas "Guardian" Jared E. Shafer Sued for Embezzling $420,000.00 From 95-Year-Old Former "Ward"

Private Guardians Jared E. Shafer and Patience Bristol Sue Blind Man for Libel, Now Ask Taxpayers to Pay the Bill

JARED SHAFER vs REBECCA SCHULTZ - Dismissed without Prejudice

LAS VEGAS - Since November 2012 when their case was originally filed, attorneys for for-hire "guardian" Jared E. Shafer have been failed to prove that Rebecca Schultz authored 108 “Ripoff Reports” that allegedly defamed their client.

Today, Clark County District Court Judge Joanna Kishner dismissed without prejudice what many consider to be the SLAPP suit Shafer filed against Schultz in retaliation for removing her father and his fortune from Shafer's control. Guadalupe Olvera from Shafer's exploitive guardianship in 2010 after learning that Shafer had drained Olvera's bank account of hundreds of thousands of dollars with the approval of Clark County "Guardianship Commissioner" Jon Norheim.

During the course of the guardianship and the legal battle that Schultz mounted to free her father of Shafer, Olvera's bank account was drained by Shafer over $411,000.00 for "guardian fees," "e-mails," court appearances, and excessive legal fees paid to his attorneys, Soloman, Dwiggins and Freer, LTD. In 2013, a California Superior Court Judge ruled Olvera to be competent, and terminated Shafer's guardianship after Shafer paid his personal legal fees out of Olvera's Trust account.
 

Rebecca Schultz believed that had she not removed her father from Shafer's custody in 2010, her father would have died soon thereafter in a rest home of Shafer's choice, and her father's half million dollar home, car, and personal possessions would have also been taken by Shafer to pay his "fees" and other expenses to try to force Olvera to return to Nevada Schultz attorney Brian Boggess successfully argued today that Shafer's attorneys Alan Freer and Ross Evans had not supplied evidence that Schultz was the author of the Ripoff Reports in question.

After hearing forty five minutes of pleadings, Judge Kishner agreed with Boggess and dismissed the case against Schultz. Since he was moved away from Shafer's jurisdiction in Nevada and back to his home in Santa Cruz County, California, Mr. Olvera has thrived while living with his loving family.

Background

RipOffReports Solomon, Dwiggins and Freer Ltd.

Some of Jared E Shafer's Bogus Bills Bled From Guadelupe Olvera's Trust Account AFTER Shefer's Guardianship Was Terminated

Source:
AmericanMafia.com/InsideLasVegas