Showing posts with label court-appointed conservator. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court-appointed conservator. Show all posts

Sunday, July 2, 2023

Liza Horvath, Senior Advocate: An alternative to conservatorship


By Liza Horvath

Question: After the Britney Spears situation shined a light on the powers that a court appointed conservator has and how easy it would be to abuse someone by getting a conservatorship, I am lying awake at night worried sick that if I lose even a little capacity, someone could get a conservatorship over me and steal all my money and even control where I live. I have also seen the movie, “I Care a Lot” where a professional woman took advantage of elderly people by using conservatorships, stripping their assets and placing them in nursing homes! What can the average person do to protect themselves against this happening? Who can I trust?

Answer: The situations you share, the highly publicized Britney Spears case and that movie which, I am sorry to say, was based on true events, do present nightmarish situations. I understand your worry.

Before addressing your concerns, however, it should be noted that some court conservatorships are often desperately needed and are the right solution for certain situations. I had the situation where a client was losing capacity and continued to borrow money from friends and then demand that I pay them back from her trust funds. The lenders could have brought suit against her for the funds absent a conservatorship – which is what we eventually put into place. We of course paid back the loans and I admonished her friends not to lend her any more money. The conservatorship protects someone like this against future lawsuits for her actions.

Conservatorships can be cumbersome, however, and due to the court’s involvement, are public in nature. They are expensive, restrictive and invasive. Having a trust, power of attorney for finances and an Advance Health Care Directive in place can obviate the need for a court conservatorship. Good estate planning is your first line of defense.

On Jan. 1, California adopted Assembly Bill No. 1663 which makes reforms to probate and conservatorship law and offer a less-restrictive alternative by way of “Protective Proceedings.” According to an article written by Klaus Gottlieb, Esq., published in the Winter 2023 California Lawyers Association Trust & Estates Quarterly, “California joins an increasing number of states that have made less-restrictive alternatives to conservatorship a legislative priority. Supported Decision Making is one of them. The idea is that adults with a disability, which could include dementia, retain their autonomy and make their own decisions, albeit with support.”

Supported Decision Making can be an informal arrangement, such as your son helping you continue to make sound decisions or can be memorialized in a written SDM agreement. Like any legal arrangement, attorneys generally support having such an agreement fully documented.

With an SDM agreement, the signer of the agreement (you in this case), can continue to act independently. There appear to be some shortcomings in the legislation which need to be worked out like should the SDM be compensated; are third parties, such as doctors or banks, required to accept the decision maker’s decision; and the big one, is the decision maker held to a fiduciary standard? These legal amendments are new and educational programs for attorneys, individuals, courts and the public need to be developed. However, once solidly in place, a supported decision-making scenario would seemingly provide for a better alternative than the current court conservatorships.

Liza Horvath has over 30 years of experience in the estate planning and trust fields and is a licensed professional fiduciary. Liza currently serves as president of Monterey Trust Management. This is not intended to be legal or tax advice.

Full Article & Source:
Liza Horvath, Senior Advocate: An alternative to conservatorship

Sunday, January 16, 2022

Will a conservatorship help homelessness in San Diego County?

While there's no plan in place yet, some are excited while some say it's not the solution.
 
 
Author: Regina Ahn, CBS News 8 Team

SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Calif. — The homelessness crisis in San Diego has been a priority for state and local leaders.

With a diverse population, there's a lot to be done to help combat the situation, and one tool is a conservatorship program for the homeless. While there's no plan in place yet, some are excited while some say it's not the solution.

"This year, I’m pushing for state action on conservatorships," San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria said in his State of the City address on Wednesday.

Conservatorships in which a court appointed conservator manages another person's living situation, medical decisions, and mental health treatment – has gotten support from both Mayor Todd Gloria and Governor Gavin Newsom.

"We have more treatment programs, more conservatorships," said Gov. Newsom.

However, San Diego attorney Scott Dreher, who has worked with homeless people for over 20-years says it may not be the answer.

He says the issue and solution is too complex. 

In San Diego, it’s extremely difficult to get a conservatorship, according to experts. It requires a judge’s order and there are limited conservatorships, and a family member must be present.

"Anyone who thinks that ‘oh, we’ll just put everyone in a conservatorship’ and that’ll take care of that…that’s never going to happen, that’s not the way around this," said Dreher.

Dreher says while it may be a solution for some people, there are more pressing things that could help. "What's going to solve the problem is giving people a place to be that may not have a place to be," said Dreher.

Mayor Gloria and Dreher both say housing is the biggest issue to combat homelessness.

"The shortage of homes every day San Diegans can afford is splitting up families," said Mayor Gloria.

But there’s also the issue of being mindful and compassionate towards the homeless population,

Amie Zamudio is the homeless outreach director with “Housing 4 The Homeless” and says there are no simple solutions.

"What we’re seeing is there are some people who cannot take care of themselves and no matter how much support we offer, they refuse support,” said Zamudio. “They just can’t take care of themselves it’s not humane to leave people out on these streets to decay and die."


Full Article & Source:

Monday, July 5, 2021

Conservator who pleaded guilty to felony embezzlement to be sentenced July 19


By Mardi Link

PETOSKEY — A court-appointed conservator who pleaded guilty to two counts of felony embezzlement as part of a plea agreement with the Emmet County Prosecutor’s Office, is scheduled to be sentenced July 19 in 57th Circuit Court.

Elise Page of Harbor Springs is accused of embezzling more than $17,000 from bank accounts belonging to two vulnerable adults assigned to her by the Emmet County Probate Court.

The missing funds came to light last fall during a months-long investigation by the Harbor Springs Police Department and the Petoskey Department of Public Safety.

Page was arraigned May 3.

Funds went missing from the accounts of George Pappas, a 95-year-old World War II veteran of Harbor Springs and Isiah Gill of Petoskey, within months of Page being assigned to handle their finances, court records show.

Conservators are appointed by the probate court to administer a person’s financial affairs when, because of age, injury or illness, a judge decides they are no longer able to handle these tasks themselves.

A related court appointment, a guardianship, is made by the court when a judge determines someone cannot handle their own housing or medical decisions.

Both roles have long been the subject of scrutiny by Michigan officials — most recently in hearings before the state’s House Judiciary Committee, where Attorney General Dana Nessel and others gave testimony on proposed reforms.

Michigan law states a probate court judge can appoint anyone they like to be a conservator or a guardian, so long as the person is older than 18 and “competent,” though critics of the system say the term is not well defined.

Systemic oversight deficiencies of probate court appointments have been acknowledged by lawmakers for decades.

Each probate court sets many of its own procedural rules and there is no requirement that a guardian or conservator disclose whether they have appointments in other counties. Critics say this makes it more difficult to identify conservators and guardians unfit to serve.

Without such a requirement, Emmet County officials would have had no way of knowing that Page had been appointed to serve as guardian for at least two vulnerable adults in Cheboygan County.

Page was later removed from those cases by Cheboygan County Probate Court Judge Daryl P. Vizina following an alert from Harbor Springs Police Chief Kyle Knight.

“There’s no official protocol for (law enforcement) as far as letting another court know but once I got wind that she was a conservator over there, I called and shared my concerns,” Knight said.

Prosecutor James Linderman declined to discuss the Page case, citing the upcoming sentencing hearing, but said court staff and law enforcement officers do try to communicate with each other on possible criminality from county to county.

Linderman said the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan has a forum where prosecutors can communicate with each other and such alerts can also be shared there.

“We also might find something by running a CCH on LEIN,” Linderman said.

A CCH is computerized criminal history and LEIN is the Michigan Law Enforcement Information Network accessible only to criminal justice agencies.

Michigan does not require certification or background checks of guardians or conservators — an oversight that proposed legislation, if passed, might remedy but only if expanded to include civil litigation.

Emmet County Probate Register Deb Niswander did request a criminal background check on Page which returned no criminal convictions, records show.

An investigation by the Record-Eagle, however, revealed a history of financial lawsuits filed against Page in Emmet County’s 90th District Court going back to 2004.

Police documents show Page spent about $4,000 of Pappas’ money on retail purchases like electronic cigarettes and women’s clothing and withdrew another $10,000 in cash from his account just weeks after being named his conservator.

Approximately $4,000 was missing from Gill’s account, court records show.

Page has since pleaded guilty to two felony counts of embezzlement of more than $1,000 and less than $20,000, from a vulnerable adult, which each carry a sentence of up to five years in prison.

Page must also pay restitution of $17,333.88 as part of the plea deal, court records show.

In exchange for the plea agreement, several charges of embezzlement and using a computer to commit a crime were dismissed, records show.

Jonathan Steffy, listed in court records as Page’s attorney, did not return calls seeking comment.

Full Article & Source:

Thursday, September 24, 2020

When Conservatorship Goes Terribly Wrong

My family's troubling experience with the man appointed to manage my mother's life

 
The author's mother
By Erica Loberg

When people ask me about the circumstances surrounding the painful story of my mother’s probate conservatorship — where the man appointed by a judge to manage my mother’s finances and daily life inflicted financial and mental abuse on her — there’s one question I always encounter: How did this happen to your family?

A simple answer: it can happen to anyone.

Roughly 1.5 million Americans are under guardianship or conservatorship, most of them over 65. Although many conservators and guardians do excellent work, some are notorious. One AARP article said: “Activists charge that in some cases, unscrupulous professional guardians have turned legally sanctioned exploitation into a cottage industry, abetted by greedy attorneys and pliable judges.”

A more complicated answer: our family fell apart after my father died.

I was caught in the middle, not sure what best for my mom.

It took me almost two years and half a dozen court hearings to successfully remove the conservator who I’d describe as a criminal sociopath. He charged several thousands of dollars a month for my mother’s minimal care, blew through a massive amount of my mother’s money and emptied her house.

My Family’s Conservatorship Story

Here is my story, followed by advice so something similar doesn’t happen to you:

My father, a Los Angeles orthodontist and UCLA School of Dentistry faculty member, was diagnosed with cancer in 2016 and passed away 11 days later at 69. After his death, my family realized that he did not leave a will, and there was no guidance on how we should proceed with caring for my mom or managing her estate. As a result, my two sisters and I had different opinions on what should transpire.

With the shock of our father’s death and our immersion in grieving, we weren’t able to come together and move forward collectively. So, shortly after my dad died, my 70-year-old mother was appointed a conservator. (A conservator — sometimes called a guardian — is appointed by a judge when someone is no longer able to make financial or health decisions for themselves.)

For several years prior to my father’s death, he was in charge of the household finances, managing most of the day-to-day tasks like grocery shopping and handling all the bills. My mom was no longer able to manage the stressors of maintaining the household at the time.

When my father died, my older sister thought it would be better for our mother to live in an assisted living facility; my younger sister thought she should remain at home. I was caught in the middle, not sure what was best for my mom.

Initially, my mom wanted to go to an assisted living facility, but after a few months there, she decided she wanted to be back in her home. Mayhem unfolded. So, I decided to reach out to my mom’s older brother for guidance and help. He and my younger sister got my mother back home and found her a lawyer who recommended that my mother be conserved.

The Conservator Is Appointed

The lawyer filed the paperwork to make it happen.

The requirements to become a professional, licensed conservator vary from state to state. Not all states require licensing; others mandate a credential from a professional organization in addition to licensing. To become a conservator in California, either you must file a petition with the court and nominate yourself or another interested party can nominate you.

Given the contentious nature of our family, we weren’t given any options to decide on a particular conservator. We showed up to court and the conservator the judge appointed was there, ready to take over. His fees would be paid by the estate, which he controlled.

It was all very confusing, and my sisters and I were operating more or less in the dark.

Prior to this conservatorship assignment, I discovered, the man who became my mother’s conservator was listed on a website about guardianship abuse. Its victims shared personal warning and tragic stories.

I remember the night before the hearing at the Los Angeles Superior Court probate department to approve his position, my mother was held hostage in her home and not allowed to speak to any family members.

Her own best friend flew in from out of state to speak to her and explain the dangers of her situation, and my mom was instructed not to open the door to anyone or else she would be sent to a nursing home. I only found out later that anytime he wanted something, he would use the nursing home as a threat so he could do as he pleased.

Trying to Stop the Conservator

When I went to the hearing to try to stop his petition for appointment, I presented the judge the list of testimonials I’d seen of his abuse. But I was immediately shut down.

I walked home that day and thought to myself, something’s not right.

After that, the court assigned us an attorney representing the interests of my mom to make sure the chosen conservator was the right fit for the family. In LA County, this kind of lawyer is known as a member of the Probate Volunteer Panel — attorneys who register with the court to help resolve probate proceedings.

During the hearing with the PVP, it was my older sister and I (who didn’t want this conservator) on one side of the courtroom and my younger sister (who did) on the other. The PVP chose to side with my younger sibling’s wishes, and the conservator was officially appointed.

Soon after, all the belongings from my mom’s house, where I grew up, were removed, with no indication of their whereabouts and with no communication about this with the family.

I remember the first time I walked into the house once this had happened; it looked like a living room set from “The Price Is Right” game show with all the furniture replaced by what looked like IKEA home ware. The family heirlooms, including paintings of my mother’s, were removed, too.

“I used to work in nursing homes over a decade ago, and he was known to prey on vulnerable women.”

The kitchen had been completely remodeled. Those adobe tiles my dad had personally laid in the floor were replaced with plain ugly squares. I opened the cupboards only to find all the china was missing. The box of recipes passed down from generation to generation was nowhere to be found, either.

Down in the basement, the wine cellar was gone. I wandered upstairs to an empty second floor and found the walls that used to hang family photos where bare. My childhood bedroom was a hallow box.

All attempts to connect with the conservator were for naught.

Shut Out From Information About Mom

I only found out that my mother was hospitalized for dehydration days afterwards. When I did, I tried phoning the conservator’s office to insist on  being alerted if my mother was sick, especially a hospitalization; he wouldn’t take my call.

I followed up with an email stating that correspondence about serious matters concerning my mother’s health was unacceptable. I didn’t receive a reply, but the conservator charged my mother’s estate for receiving the email, and for my phone call.

When I contacted St. John’s Hospital, where my mom had been discharged. I asked to speak to the social worker. I got her on the phone, mentioned my mom’s conservator’s name and she fell silent.

I asked if she knew him and she said, “I used to work in nursing homes over a decade ago, and he was known to prey on vulnerable women.”

Then one day, I received a call from another woman who had been victimized by the same conservator. She was involuntarily removed from her home and placed in a nursing care facility. This was one of several similar stories I heard.

Over time, I began to understand his pattern: Prey on vulnerable victims, isolate them from their loved ones, allow no open lines of communication with the family, provide no transparency in billing, bleed the estate, then toss the people in conservatorship into nursing homes. When they run out of money there, leave them there to rot and die.

The Estate Gets Drained

I remember when the conservator did unnecessary renovations on the house, which were expensive and draining the estate, I asked my mom why she allowed them. She told me that if she didn’t go along with what he had recommended, she’d end up back in a nursing home.

My mom was constantly subject to manipulative abusive bullying behavior that came from the conservator.

As far as I can tell, my mother had very little in-person communication with him. For the most part, he employed his minions to do his dirty work, which only calls into question the caregiving company he employed to watch over my mother. In fact, this conservator is practically invisible; you’ll never find a picture online or a profile on social media about him.

When I tried to contact my mom by phone, her number had always been changed. That happened numerous times.

There was only one time my mom called me. It came in on an unidentified number, so I didn’t pick up. However there was an accidental message left on my voicemail:

“She’s not picking up, call her back.” (Mom)

“She doesn’t want to speak to you.” (Her caregiver)

The Conservator Tries to Keep Me Away From My Mother

I remember the one time I picked my mom up when no one was there and took her downtown to spend the night with me. We left a note on the refrigerator letting the caregiver know she was with me, and that we were going to have brunch together. When the caregiver found out, she was instructed to immediately show up at my building to retrieve my mother. After that incident, she had 24/7 people in her home to watch her.

They were more or less bodyguards to keep her away from spending any private time with the family. Once my mother’s conservator realized I was after him, he tried to put a restraining order on me to keep me from talking to my mom, saying I was causing my mother stress by voicing my concerns about him stealing her money.

To avoid the worst outcome for my mom, I immediately went to work to try and remove him as soon as possible.

I decided I’d do this on my own, rather than hiring a Los Angeles attorney at $500 an hour — something I couldn’t afford. I also believed I would be the best advocate for my mom, even though I knew nothing about the law or much about the process of conservatorship appeal.

I’m grateful I took on this endeavor by myself because later, when I spoke with other victims, I learned they’d spent hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting this same conservator over the years. And they’re still trying to remove him.

We just wanted the original conservator out, so we succumbed to his ultimatum.

The first thing I did was file a complaint with California’s Probate Fiduciary Bureau; it’s supposed to be a watchdog for complaints regarding conservators. The Bureau said, after conducting their “investigation,” they didn’t find any foul play.

Next, I filed two Adult Protective Services reports, a police report and an FBI complaint.

Finally, a Break

For months I blanketed Los Angeles to find any and all outlets who could help. Then one day I got a break.

I had filed a complaint with the county’s Probate Investigators Office, and after months of the financial and emotional abuse inflicted on my mother, my complaint finally led to a report recommending his removal.

I went back to court and presented the report, arguing that my mother’s mental, emotional and psychological health was deteriorating. The judge assigned a new PVP to put fresh eyes on the case.

This opened the door for me to get the conservator temporarily removed. The initial judge who appointed the conservator had retired, which I thought might help the situation.

I argued that my mother’s PVP who recommended her conservator had never interviewed all the siblings, asked for a new PVP and the judge agreed.

The Troubled Mediation

After this PVP conducted her investigation, she provided a report calling for a new conservator. Because my mother’s conservator didn’t want to step down, we were off to mediation.

The next thing I knew, I was in an office with my older sister, the new PVP, the new temporary conservator and me in one room and the original conservator with his lawyer in another.

The mediation turned out to be a disaster.

The conservator lied about stealing all the family belongings, among other things. But the new temporary conservator had uncovered his wrongdoings. The conservator agreed to relinquish his position only if we fired the temporary one and went with one of his suggestions.

After 10 hours of torture, my sister and I gave in. We just wanted the original conservator out, so we succumbed to his ultimatum.

After the mediation I researched the new permanent conservator my mother was given, and discovered questionable articles written about her in The Los Angeles Times. I also learned that they both she and the original conservator used the same caregiving company, which struck me as odd.

I raced back to court and filed paperwork to undo the original conservator’s “suggestion.” Thankfully, at the next hearing, we won.

Getting Mom the Care She Needed and Deserved

We were able to make the good, temporary conservator my mother’s permanent conservator. Finally, after almost two years, my mom was able to start getting the care she needed and deserved.

Before the new conservator, my mother didn’t see any doctors, except that one time she was hospitalized. Now, she was seeing a primary care doctor and a therapist.

I’ve since seen my mom a handful of times; mostly we speak on the phone. She’s doing pretty well.

But when I walk into her house, I don’t recognize anything, and it makes me sad.

I doubt we’ll ever get back any of the items that were ransacked. It’s so depressing not to find my dad’s vinyl record collection in the living room or the wallpaper in the dining room where we shared family dinners every night together. Seeing the chandelier over the dining room table replaced with a cheap tacky light traumatizes me.

I don’t need my high school trophies or any other items from my old bedroom, but why did the conservator find it necessary to remove all the belongings from the house?

Best as I can tell, he was preparing the house for someone else to inhabit, so he could make money from the sale while my mother would live alone in a nursing home.

I still have hope that one day, my mother’s initial conservator will be brought to justice.

4 Ways to Prevent a Conservatorship Disaster

How can you avoid an experience like my family and I had? There’s no guarantee, but here are four suggestions:

Discuss your parents’ estate wishes and their finances while they are alive. I wish we had done that with my dad.

Find out if your parents have wills, what they entail and where they are. Learn about your parents’ assets and debts as well as how they’d like to live if their spouse dies before they do.

If you can, get a durable power of attorney and a health care advance directive, giving you or someone whom you trust the authority to make decisions for a parent if they can’t.

If you will need to hire someone who isn’t a family member or friend to be a conservator for your parent, do your homework. Make sure you choose a conservator with an excellent resumé and with reliable recommendations. Don’t do what we did and accept some random person assigned by the court.

If my sisters and I had taken these steps, most likely none of the abuse our mother suffered would have happened.

If things do go wrong with a conservatorship, document everything. I cannot emphasize this enough. It means keeping a record of all conversations you have with parent that are concerning, with dates and times. This will help you make a solid case to get the conservator removed.

If applicable, cover all aspects of the conservatorship abuse, including mental abuse — not just financial abuse.

Don’t give up. Despite the long odds to remove my mother’s conservator, I never quit, despite his evil attempts to silence me and taint my relationship with my mother. If I can do it, you can do it.

If you can afford to hire a conservatorship attorney to remove a conservator, you might want to do it.

Now, back to my initial question: How did this happen to your family?

The bigger question is how was this allowed to happen to my family?

And another question: Why aren’t there better checks and balances in the conservatorship system?

The Problems With Conservatorship in America

While states have laws designed to protect people under conservatorship, in reality, there’s very little oversight. A National Center for State Courts report said: “Nationally, there is a dire need for guardianship/conservatorship reform, as relatively few courts have the resources, staffing or expertise to actively monitor conservatorships.”

In 2017, the Uniform Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act was approved by a group called the Uniform Law Commission. Among other things, it’s supposed to get rid of guardians and conservators not acting in the best interest of the people they’re assisting; let courts “remove a conservator for failure to perform the conservator’s duties or other good cause” and limit the ability of unscrupulous guardians to drain assets by charging unreasonable fees.

But so far, only two states (Maine and New Mexico) have adopted any or all of this model act.

At a 2018 Senate Special Committee on Aging hearing, Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) said: “Some states have taken efforts to improve guardianship, but it’s also clear that much more work needs to be done.”

At that hearing, Nina Kohn, associate dean at Syracuse University College of Law, said: “Currently, monitoring is typically anemic, and the ability to monitor is generally limited to under-resourced courts.”

So, how did this happen to my family?

You tell me.

(You can read more about my experience with my mother’s conservatorship in my recent book of poetry,  “I’m Not Playing.”)

Full Article & Source:

Monday, August 24, 2020

Audit: Don’t make it easier to force mentally ill Californians into treatment — just improve treatment

by Jocelyn Wiener

A homeless person in a wheelchair on Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles. The has struggled with how to provide care for people with mental illness, but a new state audit says the solution isn't lowering the criteria for compelling mentally ill Californians to get treatment. Photo by Damian Dovarganes, AP Photo
California’s half-century-old involuntary mental health treatment law isn’t broken, but much of the system meant to serve those with serious mental illness is, state auditors concluded in a much-anticipated report released today.

Some critics have called for rewriting state law to make it easier to force people into involuntary treatment, particularly by expanding the state’s definition of “grave disability” — something many recent bills have attempted – and failed— to do.

But instead, state auditors pointed the finger at treatment systems.

The thrust of their findings, based on an audit of Los Angeles, San Francisco and Shasta counties’ mental health systems, is encapsulated in the report’s title: “California Has Not Ensured That Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses Receive Adequate Ongoing Care.”

Among State Auditor Elaine Howle’s major findings:
  • Individuals who are under conservatorship — in which a court-appointed conservator manages another person’s living situation, medical decisions and mental health treatment — have limited treatment options. Many wait an average of a year to get into state hospitals. 
  • People coming off of involuntary holds do not consistently receive ongoing care — in two counties, no more than 9% of these individuals were connected to such care.
  • Two-thirds of the state’s counties have not yet implemented an assisted outpatient treatment program, also known as Laura’s Law.
  • A lack of transparency and communication — both about how money is spent and who is in the mental health system — gets in the way of providing needed services to individuals with serious mental illness, and keeps the public from knowing whether mental health funds are being well-spent.
Not everyone agreed with all of the audit’s major findings and recommendations. Los Angeles County’s top mental health official was especially concerned by the auditor’s unwillingness to consider changing the law to make it easier to conserve people with serious mental illness who resist treatment. He also criticized the audit for failing to show how counties like his might receive more support from the state, feeling that it instead places further restrictions on how counties can use certain mental health funds.

Full Article & Source:
Audit: Don’t make it easier to force mentally ill Californians into treatment — just improve treatment

Thursday, May 9, 2019

Former councilor sentenced to prison

Former city councilor and attorney, Jodi Zils Gagne, 43, of Bristol was given a 46 month sentence followed by three years of supervised release by U.S. District Judge Vanessa L. Bryant in Hartford.

Gagne was sentenced for stealing more than $169,000 from individuals for whom she served as a court-appointed conservator, reported a press release from the United States Attorney’s Office of the District of Connecticut.

According to court documents and statements made in court, the press release said, Zils Gagne, an attorney, was a court-appointed conservator for several individuals in Connecticut.

The release explained a conservator is a person appointed by the probate court to oversee the financial or personal affairs of an adult who is incapable of managing his or her finances or unable to care for himself or herself.

Beginning in approximately May 2015, according to the Department of Justice, Zils Gagne defrauded several conserved individuals by misappropriating their money and overbilling them. The money that Zils Gagne misappropriated was intended for the conserved persons’ medical care, housing, bills, personal expenses, and legitimate conservator fees.  Zils Gagne also misrepresented, or failed to disclose, material facts about her conservatorship activities to the Bristol probate court and others, said the release.

Through this scheme, the justice department said, Zils Gagne defrauded six victims of a total of $169,402.74. She defrauded one elderly victim of approximately $136,000, and appropriated $113,000 of that money under the guise of an “investment” when, in fact, it was a 10-year note that paid only a prime rate and was signed between her (as the victim’s conservator) and Zils Gagne’s husband, said the Justice Department. The money was used to fund her husband’s start-up company, a Bristol-based internet radio station, Bristol Beat.

The terms and details of this transaction were only disclosed after extended proceedings in the probate court, during which Zils Gagne repeatedly lied, sometimes under oath, to the probate court, said the Justice Department.

The investigation also revealed that Zils Gagne arranged the sale of two victims’ houses to her relative for less than the appraised value of the homes, said the news release.  The buyer than renovated the homes, sold them for a substantial profit, and paid Zils Gagne and her husband kickbacks.

On Oct. 10, 2018, Zils Gagne pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud.

Judge Bryant ordered Zils Gagne, who is released on a $50,000 bond, to report to prison on July 8.

In September 2018, a Connecticut Superior Court judge suspended Zils Gagne from the practice of law.

This matter was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Greenwich Police Department, with the assistance of the Connecticut Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel and the New Britain State’s Attorney’s Office.  The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney David T. Huang.

Full Article & Source:
Former councilor sentenced to prison

Sunday, August 12, 2018

New Fairfield veteran celebrates turning 100

NEW FAIRFIELD — With balloons tied to his chair and a smile on his face, World War II veteran Lou Russo marked turning 100 on Saturday with a party in his home, surrounded by many of the friends who had helped him return there just a few years ago.

The combat veteran, who had turned 100 that Wednesday, greeted guests in a fitting “Lou: the man, the myth, the legend” shirt in his living room, sharing stories and secrets for reaching the milestone age.

“I feel like I’m just born,” Russo said when asked how it felt to turn 100.

If it weren’t for the framed photos of volunteers repairing the home and stories from friends, it’d be hard to tell that it had been a collapsed roof in this room that put Russo at the center of a year-long court battle back in 2013.

Back then, Russo had been placed against his will in a nursing home when he was injured in a fall and his house was found in disrepair.

The fight to get him back to the Hammond Road house, taken on by friends and fellow veterans, also brought together volunteers from nearly a dozen community organizations to repair the home.

Many who joined the party Saturday recalled how groups like Habitat for Humanity, The Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation, Home Depot and others took on an extensive renovation so Russo could live comfortably in the house he had built himself.

“It was worth the effort,” said Bob Kubisek, explaining how his company Summit Stair and volunteers helped put in new stairs and railings. “It was great to see (everyone) coming together to help out the elderly. I think we should do it more often.”

Russo’s battle had also prompted legislation in Hartford last year, co-authored by state Sen. Michael McLachlan, to better protect the elderly from court-appointed conservators. Russo’s first conservator had sold the veteran’s belongings and rented out his house to another family while he was staying in the nursing home.

The 100-year-old’s conservator is now Joe Schirmer, a veteran and one of the friends who led the charge to bring him home.

One of the highlight’s of Saturday’s party was when McLachlan stopped by to present Russo with an official happy birthday citation from Hartford.

“Congratulations on 100 years and a happy birthday,” McLachlan read. “...And hope for continued success.”

“Continued age,” Russo joked before thanking the senator. “I’m going to frame this, that’s going right on the wall.”

As for the secret to reach 100? It’s all about food, Russo said.

“I learned about nutrition in 1942,” Russo said. “You eat well and you feel good all the time, that’s all it is.”

Full Article & Source:
New Fairfield veteran celebrates turning 100

Monday, August 6, 2018

Call Collett: DOJ called to investigate Charleston probate court over "stolen wealth"

Following a Count on 2 investigation, the National Action Network is urging the Justice Department to take a look at Charleston's probate court.

The news comes after a local family lost control of their own money for two years under a court-ordered conservatorship.  

The Bennett family shared their story with News 2's Rebecca Collett in the Fall of 2017. After a series of reports, this week the family regained control of their finances.

Elder James Johnson is the local leader of NAN. The organization held a series of marches over the last two months to support the family in recovering their "stolen wealth". Johnson announced Wednesday the organization is asking the Department of Justice to investigate the probate judge who handled the case along with everyone else involved over the last two years.

The court battle cost the Bennett family more than $45,000.



Full Article & Source:
Call Collett: DOJ called to investigate Charleston probate court over "stolen wealth"