Tuesday, October 12, 2021

Ohio bill would allow cameras in nursing home rooms so families can capture neglect and abuse

Photos of Esther Piskor in her older and younger years. Senate Bill 58, Esther’s Law, would allow in-room cameras at nursing facilities. Piskor son caught abuse of his mother on a hidden camera. (Courtesy Steve Piskor)

By Laura Hancock

COLUMBUS, Ohio — A bill making its way through the Ohio General Assembly would allow nursing home residents or their guardians to install a camera in their rooms.

The bipartisan-sponsored Senate Bill 58, also called Esther’s Law, is the farthest the measure has ever advanced in the legislative process, having passed in the Ohio Senate unanimously on May 19 and now up for its third hearing in a House committee meeting on Thursday.

The bill takes its name from Esther Piskor, a resident of a Cleveland nursing home. Cameras placed in her room by her family revealed that nurses’ aides abused her, later leading to their arrest and criminal convictions related to the abuse.

For nearly a decade, the Ohio General Assembly considered measures that would allow in-room cameras to catch neglect or abuse, observers said. The coronavirus pandemic underscored a need for heightened remote access to loved ones in nursing homes, especially when the spread of the virus kept families and their loved ones apart.

“Esther’s Law is a problem-solver to the COVID issue,” her son Steve Piskor said. “Family members can see their loved ones instead of peering through a window.”

A handful of other states, such as Illinois, Kansas and Minnesota, allow families to install cameras in nursing homes, said sponsor Sen. Nickie Antonio, a Lakewood Democrat.

In Ohio, “the law was silent. It didn’t say anything one way or the other. Some facilities said you’re not allowed to do it, but there was nothing saying that in the law,” she said.

Esther’s story

Ten years ago, Esther Piskor of Cleveland was in a nursing home with dementia. She used a wheelchair and needed direct care since she couldn’t do many tasks for herself. She wasn’t talkative but could answer short questions, her son said.

“When I’d go there, I’d say, ‘Are you OK?’” he said. “Some days she’d say, ‘Yes.’ Some days she’d say, ‘No.’”

He’d ask her if she was eating, and sometimes she indicated she was not.

Steve Piskor grew suspicious that someone in the home was abusing his mother. He installed an old camera in his mom’s room, but nursing home aides complained it violated their privacy, he said. He said he tried arguing that employees didn’t have privacy rights in his mother’s room, but the nursing home administrator allowed employees to cover it.

“So that prompted me to put a hidden camera in,” he said.

Footage showed an aide roughly lifting his mother out of her wheelchair by her arms and throwing her into the bed. Then, in a separate incident, they dropped her into her wheelchair. Steve Piskor said the way they flung his mother’s body around was hard to watch and is against the protocols of how you lift and carry a resident’s body.

One day, when visiting his mom, Steve Piskor said the room was cold. The heat was on, but the window was wide open. He said it was 20 degrees outside.

He said he had other footage showing aides spritzing room or body spray into his mother’s face, which helped explain her eye irritation. He said the aides yelled at his mother, and another threw a gown over her face.

“You can’t do that to a dementia person. They don’t have any clue what’s going on,” he said.

In 2011, Esther Piskor was about 5 feet tall and weighed 100 pounds.

“They easily could have killed her,” he said.

The Ohio Attorney General’s Office investigated the case and referred it to the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office.

In November 2011, Virgen Caraballo pleaded guilty to seven counts of patient abuse, fourth-degree felonies. A judge sentenced her to 10 1/2 years in prison, but she was released after 7 1/2 years with the condition that she enter a rehab program and not have contact with the elderly.

As part of her plea, Caraballo relinquished her State Tested Nursing Aid Certification and can’t work in a facility that receives Medicaid.

Another nurse’s aide, Maria Karban, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault and was sentenced to 6 months in jail.

Other aspects of the bill

Under SB 58, the resident, their guardian or attorney would be responsible for the costs of installing, maintaining and removing the camera. They would also have to pay for wifi unless the nursing home had free wifi.

Antonio, the bill’s sponsor, said that she reached out to stakeholders, including nursing home groups, to make the bill acceptable. Another measure called Esther’s Law, House Bill 78, is in the House but has only received one committee hearing and doesn’t have the amendments in the Senate version of the bill.

The Ohio Health Care Association, the largest long-term care association in the state with over 1,000 members, is neither an opponent nor proponent of the bill.

Leading Age Ohio, which represents 400 facilities, is also not taking a position on the bill. Its Chief Policy Officer Susan Wallace said she managed to get some changes to the Senate bill, such as addressing a resident who has a roommate who does not consent to being filmed. Under the bill, the nursing home must make a reasonable attempt to accommodate the resident by moving the resident or roommate to another available room.

“Cameras are ubiquitous these days. Many providers are using remote monitoring, for health reasons, which is not too different (than cameras,)” she said. “This year with COVID, we are not surprised this bill has the extra energy than it has had in the past.”

Full Article & Source:

#FreeBritney Termination Rally

#FreeBritney

Termination Rally

 Britney Spears's conservatorship is expected to be terminated in its entirety during her next hearing on Nov. 12. Let's all join together as we continue the fight for justice for Britney and all conservatees! 
 

Friday, Nov. 12
1:00 PM PT
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles

(Get Directions)

Wondering what to expect at a rally? Read this

Can't attend? Don't worry, we will livestream the rally from @FreeBritneyLA on Instagram.

 

Source:

#FreeBritney

20 W 34th St

New York City, NY 10001

Lyon County caregiver arrested for neglect following death of patient


by Evan Beebe

LYON COUNTY, KY– A Lyon County caregiver was arrested Saturday after his client, an elderly woman, was found with life-threatening injuries. She was also malnourished, dehydrated and septic.

On Saturday afternoon, the Lyon County Sheriff's Office and Lyon County EMS responded to a call at a residence on KY 295 north of Kuttawa. Once the victim was discovered she was immediately transferred to Mercy Health-Lourdes Hospital. The victim died from her injuries just after 10 a.m. Sunday.

50-year-old William Hammonds of Kuttawa was arrested at the victims home Saturday. According to the Lyon County Sheriff's Office, Hammond was the victims only caregiver.

Lyon County sheriff's deputies executed a search warrant for the home during which they gathered evidence related to the investigation.

Hammond was initially charged with wanton abusing or neglecting an adult. Due to the victims death, those charges are expected to be upgraded in the coming days or weeks.

According to the Lyon County Sheriff's Office, a forensic autopsy of the victim is expected from the Western KY Regional Medical Examiner’s Office in Madisonville later this week.

Hammond is being held at the Crittenden County Detention Center. 

Full Article & Source:

Monday, October 11, 2021

Guardianship requests decline as knowledge of alternative legal option grows

Supportive decision-making alternative helps maintain people’s rights to make decisions
Click to Watch Video
By Emily Davies

AUBURNDALE, Wis. (WSAW) - In July 2020 Jordan Anderson and his twin, marked a milestone; the two turned 18 and became legal adults. It is a big day for anyone, but especially for children with disabilities and their families. Born 12 weeks early, the two have cerebral palsy.

The Auburndale family scheduled a hearing with the court that fall so Anderson’s parents could have legal guardianship over them to protect them and support them as they go through adulthood. In addition to planning for the two to graduate high school and prepare for their future, securing guardianship is an expected next step for many families who have children with disabilities.

Just before the hearing, Anderson attended a virtual conference that empowers people with disabilities called the Wisconsin Self-Determination Conference. He sat in on a session George Zaske, an attorney and member of the Wisconsin Board for People With Developmental Disabilities, led.

“That was the first time I’ve ever heard about supportive decision-making,” Anderson said. “Once I heard George say you might lose your right to vote, that really got my mind going.”

The sports, journalism, politics, and hunting enthusiast also learned guardianship could take away his right to hunt and make decisions.

“These are pretty significant decisions,” Zaske told NewsChannel 7. “A guardianship order can transfer all of the rights to a guardian and that guardianship order can stay in place for decades.”

After listening to the concerns and frustrations of individuals and families navigating the guardianship system, the Wisconsin Board for People With Developmental Disabilities worked with legislators to offer a less restrictive alternative. Wisconsin became one of the first five states in the country to enact the supportive decision-making law in 2018.

It is a legal document that gives the person with a disability or aging individual the ability to get support from people they trust in areas they need support, like making financial or medical decisions but leaves the ultimate decision about what to do in those circumstances up to that individual. It is a document that does not require the time or cost of going to court and is recognized by the State of Wisconsin.

“Without a law that is equally recognized the way guardianship is recognized, you know, families ran the risk of saying ‘yes, my family member wants supportive decision-making,’ but then going into a formal system like a school or a hospital and not having that recognized,” WBPDD’s executive director, Beth Swedeen stated.

Anderson learned all about the option a day before his guardianship hearing. The next morning as he was getting ready for school, he talked with his parents, shared his concerns, and told him about supported decision-making.

Anderson’s parents, like many other people looking to find ways to protect and support loved ones with disabilities, were told by attorneys they could either have guardianship over their son or no guardianship. When told about supportive decision-making, their attorneys said they had to do more research.

Since the law was introduced, guardianship requests have declined each year from 5,147 in 2017 to 4,146 by 2020. Zaske said there is still a lot of education need about supportive decision-making, noting that institutions like schools, medical facilities, financial institutions, and even judges are not aware of the different options.

“Until supportive decision-making came around, it (guardianship) was really the only option. It was kind of black and white and people over-protected their loved ones and checked a lot of options that are on the guardianship petition,” Zaske, a parent of a child with disabilities said.

As a parent, he recognized that you want to do everything to protect your child because they are not as supported in the adult world as they were as a child going through school. He noted just like all adults making their own decision, adults with disabilities may make mistakes. As long as they do not have life-threatening consequences to those decisions, there are other alternatives to help guide and protect them.

“A guardianship can be appropriate if somebody can’t recognize danger. (If) They don’t have a good sense of when they’re being exploited. But research has shown that if you give a young person, even with a cognitive disability to practice that decision-making, then, in fact, they get better at making those decisions and get a better sense of who they are and their sense of autonomy,” Zaske explained.

Swedeen said families often ask if they should go through the guardianship process first and then go to less restrictive options later, but she urged that is not recommended. She said guardianship is the most restrictive way to protect a loved one with disabilities, it costs a lot of time and money, and it can be difficult to reverse or reduce a guardianship’s restrictions after being implemented. Even if the family and individual want guardianship removed, she explained that person has already been considered legally incompetent and it is up to a judge to decide to change that label.

“So if you can start with the flexible tools and if they don’t work or if they’re not complete enough, then consider something more restrictive, that’s always going to be the easier path and the path that keeps people’s rights intact,” she said.

“I have the best parents in the world for listening to me,” Anderson smiled. He and his family decided to implement powers of attorney for medical and financial decisions, retaining Anderson’s rights, but providing him less restrictive support when he needs it.

To learn more about supportive decision-making click here. You can also register for the free Wisconsin Self-Determination Conference happening virtually Oct. 18-21, which will include in-depth explanations of options for people with disabilities who need support. Anderson will also be speaking at that conference.

Full Article & Source:

I-Team: Who tracks guardianship data? In Florida, no one

by Danielle DaRos

How many guardians are in the state of Florida?

How many people have been placed under their care?

How much money do they oversee?

We don't know. Investigators don't know. The task force charged with studying the state's broken guardianship system doesn't know.

In Florida, the simplest questions about guardianship are the hardest to answer. That's because our state lacks a centralized, statewide database keeping track of guardianship cases.

And that, some advocates say, is the first thing that needs to be fixed when overhauling the system, and cracking down on abuse.

"In today's day and age, I should be able to push a button and tell you exactly how many open, and on going cases there are," said Anthony Palmieri, Deputy Inspector General and Chief Guardianship Investigator for Palm Beach County.

He said all the information about guardianships you'd want to know are contained within individual case files, in separate counties and circuit court systems. Extracting that data and making sense of it all is no easy task.

"We were part of a high profile investigation of a guardian in Central Florida," Palmieri recalls. He said the judge asked how many wards this particular guardian was overseeing.

"It took me four days to figure out that number," he said. "Turned out she had 208 wards across 19 different counties. She was petitioning cases from the Panhandle, to Fort Myers."

One guardian amassing that many wards -- and control of their estates -- could have been a red flag if there was a central database keeping track.

Abuse in the guardianship system is well-documented. The CBS12 News I-Team has highlighted cases of guardians who have been caught stealing money from their wards, and isolating them from their families.

Guardianship, known in some states as conservatorship, is supposed to protect the elderly and disabled when they can no longer care for themselves. Judges can appoint a family member, or a professional guardian to oversee another person's decisions and money. Without proper oversight, bad actors in the system can take advantage of the people they are being paid to protect.

"Right now we have a lot of bad stories about guardians," Palmieri said. "But is that really reflective of the system as a whole? I don't know the answer to that."

Palmieri, who is the Vice-Chair of Florida's Guardianship Improvement Task Force, said the first and most important step in fixing the guardianship system is to create a statewide database to collect basic information.

Palm Beach County has started its own guardianship database where guardians upload financial reports and keep track of expenditures.

"It's a very powerful tool," Palmieri said. "Not only does it track all financial information, it also collects demographic information such as the age of the person under guardianship, their gender, their alleged incapacity, who petitioned, who is their guardian, do they have a family guardian, professional guardian, public guardian?"

Right now, the system in Palm Beach County is voluntary. Members of the task force received a demonstration and talked about using it as a model for a statewide database.

Some states, like Minnesota, are already maintaining a centralized record-keeping system.

The I-Team spoke to the managers in charge of it and saw how it works.

Jamie Majerus, Branch Audit Manager, said the Minnesota system not only keeps track of guardians and conservators across 87 counties in the state, but it can also identify outliers in expenditures and raise red flags for auditors.

She said since the state implemented the software, bad actors have been put on notice.

"The percentage of the number of bad audits have gone down," she said. "We feel the conservators are doing better. They are more educated. They know we are watching."

Members of Florida's task force have recommended the creation of a statewide database.

But there is some concern among task force members about it, specifically attorneys who work on guardianship cases.

Shannon Miller, an attorney who sits on the elder law certification committee of the Florida Bar, said she worries that putting all this financial information in one place, where software is constantly monitoring it, could be an invasion of privacy.

"This is very problematic," Miller told the task force in a recent meeting. "When you give your private information, it's just like Siri or the Internet or when big brother has information -- what you have done is exposed all your private information."


Full Article & Source:

Caregiver arrested on rape charges of elderly patient

 
Police say the man sexually assaulted an 81-year-old with dementia and Alzheimer's.
 

Source:

Sunday, October 10, 2021

California becomes 1st state to let adult children add parents to their health care plan

In this Aug. 12, 2019 file photo Assemblyman Miguel Santiago, D-Los Angeles, questions State Auditor Elaine Howle about an audit her office performed, during a hearing in Sacramento, Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a measure authored by Santiago that will let some adult children add their parents as dependents on their health insurance plans. The law would not apply to people who get health insurance through their work and only apply to people who purchase their own insurance on the individual market. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File)

by: Associated Press

California is the first state to let some adult children add their parents as dependents on their insurance plans, a move advocates hope will cover the small population of people living in the country illegally who don’t qualify for other assistance programs.

The trend nationally has been to let children linger on their parents’ health insurance plans. Former President Barack Obama’s health care law let children stay on their parents’ plans until age 26. Some states have gone further and let kids stay on their parents’ plans until at least age 30, including Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

But California is now the first state to go the other direction by letting some adults join their kids’ health insurance plans. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, signed the law this week, but it won’t take effect until 2023.

“The signing of the Parent Healthcare Act will help more families care for their parents the way they cared for us,” Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara said.

To be eligible, adults must rely on their child for at least 50% of their total support. The law applies only to people who buy their health insurance on the individual market. Those who get insurance through their jobs, which includes most people in the state, aren’t eligible.

That makes the law much cheaper. A previous version, which would have applied to more people, could have increased employer premiums between $200 million and $800 million per year, depending on how many people enrolled. That prompted business groups, including the California Chamber of Commerce, to oppose the bill — winning key concessions.

This narrower version of the law ensures far fewer people can enroll. The California Department of Insurance estimates just 15,000 adults will use this law, prompting an annual increase of between $12 million and $48 million per year for individual premiums, according to an analysis by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The change was enough for the Chamber of Commerce to remove its opposition.

The law’s author, Democratic Assemblyman Miguel Santiago of Los Angeles, said it targets people who can’t get subsidized health insurance because they are living in the country illegally.

Covered California, the state’s health insurance marketplace, offers discount insurance plans — but only to citizens. California’s Medicaid program offers government-funded insurance to people 50 and over and 25 and younger regardless of their immigration status. But some adults might be ineligible because they make just over the income limits.

The University of California Berkeley Labor Center predicts more than 3 million people won’t have health insurance in California next year, 65% of them people who are living in the country illegally.

The law is “a way to close that gap,” Santiago said, while also helping other adults who “fall through the cracks.”

“We all talk about increasing health care access, and here was a real easy way to do it,” he said.

Full Article & Source:

Marlboro Co. judge at center of investigation will work until 'facts are uncovered'

by Tonya Brown


MARLBORO COUNTY, S.C. (WPDE) — Attorney Wade Crow who is representing Marlboro County Deputy Probate Judge Tammy Bullock said she's done nothing wrong and that will be proven over time.

The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) is investigating accusations made against Bullock, at the request of the Marlboro County Sheriff's Office.

According to Tommy Crosby with SLED, it is in connection to the estate of Hollis Slade who, according to an obituary, died in January 2021.

Judge Bullock was sworn in back in March 2021.

A source said the allegations involve removing property and items from Slade's home without permission.

“I think Mrs. Bullock is willing to, I know she is, because I have told her to tell the truth about everything. An interview and talk to the SLED agent. Talk to any law-enforcement person about this thing. And just be upfront about it. She has done absolutely nothing wrong. And this has nothing to do with her job," said Crow.

Crow added Bullock worked for Slade for many years at the paper mill in Marlboro County before she accepted the position as the county's deputy probate judge.

He said Bullock was close friends with Slade and his wife.

“I really don’t think she’s done anything wrong come up myself. But try to help Mr. Slade’s wife who she is very fond of. Because she knew her for years.”

No additional information is available while the investigation is ongoing.

ABC15 has reached out to the Marlboro County Sheriff's Office to ask why they asked SLED to open the investigation.

In an unrelated matter, Bullock faces a charge of pointing and presenting a firearm in February in Bennettsville, according to Bennettsville Police Chief Kevin Miller.

ABC15 got a copy of the four-page incident report.

The report said the incident took place on February 3, 2021, but a report wasn't filed until February 5.

A 45-year-old woman is named as the complainant in the report, and Bullock as the subject.

The woman said Bullock had a gun and threatened to kill her during an argument at a home they shared in Bennettsville.

An excerpt from the police report said, "The complainant stated the verbal altercation resulted in the subject pointing a handgun in her face and making a threat to shoot her with a handgun in question. The complainant stated the handgun was medium-sized, and gray in color. The complainant further stated the handgun contained a hammer located at the back of the side.”

The officer questioned the woman about why she waited two days to file the incident report.

“I inquired with the complainant in reference to the reasoning behind her not contact the law enforcement on 02/03/2021, the complainant stated she did not know what to do at the time of the incident. The complainant stated the subject was further forcing her out of the residence. The complaint stated the subject was directing her to get all items out of the residence that day. I advised to complainant that the subject could not force her from the residence without first obtaining an eviction notice from the magistrate’s office.”

The incident report contains a statement from Bullock.

The report says, "The subject stated upon her exiting her bedroom, the complainant proceeded to jump in her face again while engaged in a fighting stance. The subject stated she then stated to the complainant 'I got a gun in my hand. I will not fight you. I’m too old, but I will defend myself.' The subject stated she never pointed her gun at the complainant at any time. The subject stated she then stated to the complainant and the complainant’s daughter, 'The best thing for y’all to do is to be moved out by the time I get home from work.' Subject stated she then exited her residence and went to the Marlboro County probate office for work."

Miller said Bullock pled not guilty to the charge and requested a jury trial.

He said the trial is scheduled to take place in November.

Meanwhile, Crow believes his client will be exonerated on the gun charge and that SLED will find no wrongdoing on her behalf.

However, he said if that's not the case, he stands ready to defend her.

“I want the truth to come out. And if they want to charge her. If I don’t feel like it with my age. Or my hearing impairment. If I don’t feel like I can adequately represent her after 60 years of practicing law. I believe I can find some young lawyer to sit with me in any court room they want to go to anywhere. Because that is all I’ve done for 60 years,” said Crow.

ABC15 called Judge Bullock, but she hasn't returned the call.

On October 8, 2021, Bullock’s superior, Marlboro County Probate Judge Mark Heath, released the following statement on her continuing to work and not being placed on leave pending the outcome of investigation and gun charge.

“Why not, these are allegations? Until the facts are uncovered, there is really nothing I can say. You can refer to her attorney.”

Full Article & Source:

Stillwater woman charged with exploiting elderly blind woman

By Patti Weaver

(Stillwater, Okla.) — A 35-year-old Stillwater woman, who was convicted of possessing heroin during two different traffic stops, has been accused of exploiting an elderly blind woman with whom she lived — by illegally obtaining her cell phone, bank card, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program card.
 
Stephanie Michelle Wisler, for whom an arrest warrant was issued last week, could be given as much as a 10-year prison term and a $10,000 fine if convicted of exploitation of an elderly person.
 
Stillwater Police Detective Richard Leport alleged in an affidavit that on March 9 another police officer received information from Adult Protective Services of the Oklahoma Department of Human Services that the victim had been exploited by Wisler, her caregiver.
 
Wisler had moved in the victim’s apartment to provide basic care for the blind woman — including cooking, cleaning, and paying bills, the affidavit alleged.
 
“Stephanie Wisler was to provide these services in exchange for her room and board,” with the victim, who was notified on Feb. 3 she was being evicted from her apartment for failing to pay the rent, the affidavit alleged.
 
“On Feb. 8, Stephanie Wisler left the apartment and took (the victim’s) cell phone, bank card, and an Oklahoma Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) card,” the affidavit alleged.
 
“On March 3, Stephanie Wisler returned to the apartment. (The victim) asked Stephanie Wisler to return her phone, bank card and SNAP card. Stephanie Wisler explained she left them in a friend’s car. Stephanie Wisler left the apartment,” the affidavit alleged.
 
 On March 5, DHS Adult Protective Services discovered that the victim was locked out of her apartment, and so moved her to a nursing home, the affidavit alleged.
 
On March 12, when Payne County Sheriff’s Deputy David Sloan arrested Wisler for having heroin as a passenger in a Cadillac in a traffic stop, she was found in possession of two debit cards in the victim’s name, the affidavit alleged.
 
Two months later, Wisler pleaded guilty to possessing heroin and syringes on March 12 of this year, and to possessing heroin, methamphetamine, and marijuana on June 26 of last year along with used syringes; she was ordered to serve a total of 60 days in jail, along with paying $2,977 in court costs, records show.
 
In the exploitation case filed last week, the police detective obtained surveillance videos from a grocery store regarding Wisler’s fraudulent transactions with an image on a cell phone of the victim’s SNAP card for $9.94 at 8:37 pm on March 7 and for $33.96 eight minutes later, the affidavit alleged. The detective also obtained surveillance videos from a convenience store regarding Wisler’s fraudulent transactions with the victim’s SNAP card for $14.63 at 5:13 am on March 10 and for $5.17 at 9:19 pm on March 16, the affidavit alleged.
 
 When the detective spoke with the victim on July 12, she “told me she is legally blind,” and recalled that on Feb. 8, Wisler “left the apartment taking her cell phone, bank card, Oklahoma SNAP card, and Oklahoma DHS cash card,” the affidavit alleged.
 
Full Article & Source: