Aging in place has become an important part of aging in America. Whether due to the struggling economy, comfort or deeper personal reasons, people simply do not want to spend their later years in nursing homes or assisted living facilities; they prefer to grow old in their own homes, usually with the help of their grown children. For the last decade or so, this has been made possible thanks to their children and amenities offered by both private companies and local governments to assist the elderly with aging in place.
Baby Boomers, however, may not be as lucky. Boomer women had fewer children than their parents and some opted out of having children at all. Combine that with higher divorce rates -- by 2030, 36 percent of older men will have been alone for a decade or longer -- and we've got a Caregiver shortage crisis on our hands.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4563d/4563d5215d9e9ed9e24ab684ee188dcd2b6b13aa" alt=""
Volunteers who participate in the program would receive specific guidelines and structure from the Department of Health and Human Services in order to provide assistance to families by "cleaning, preparing food or even shopping for people who want to remain at home" as they age, as well as respite care for existing family caregivers. The proposal also includes providing volunteers with a stipend, tuition credit or even academic credits.
Full Article and Source:
Could a Caregiver Corps Solve the Caregiving Shortage?
3 comments:
With the dangers facing the elderly in ALFs and nursing homes these days, they are far safer at home. And this could preclude having their pockets picked by court-appointed guardians!
It sounds good, but the problem is whenever great profit can be made, the intent corrupts.
I think it's a wonderful idea, but isn't home health already in that business?
Post a Comment