Showing posts with label special needs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label special needs. Show all posts

Friday, July 30, 2021

FBI: Albuquerque Couple Sentenced To Prison For Crimes Committed In Connection With Ayudando Guardians Case

FBI News:

ALBUQUERQUE — Susan K. Harris, 74, and William S. Harris, 60, both of Albuquerque, were sentenced Friday in Federal Court for conspiracy to defraud the United States and other financial crimes committed in connection with the operation of Ayudando Guardians, Inc., a non-profit corporation that previously provided guardianship, conservatorship and financial management to hundreds of people with special needs.

Susan Harris was sentenced to 47 years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. William Harris was sentenced to 15 years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Both will be required to pay the entire amount of stolen funds as restitution to the victims. 

A superseding indictment filed Dec. 5, 2017, charged Susan Harris, William Harris, Sharon A. Moore, 64, and Susan Harris’ son, Craig M. Young, 53, with various financial crimes, including conspiracy to defraud the United States, mail fraud, aggravated identity theft and money laundering.

Susan Harris pleaded guilty July 11, 2019, to conspiracy, mail fraud, aggravated identity theft, money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. William Harris pleaded guilty June 25, 2019, to conspiracy to defraud the United States and to commit money laundering.

Both Susan Harris and William Harris were originally scheduled to be sentenced March 2, 2020, but failed to appear for their sentencing hearing. A bench warrant was issued for their arrest and the U.S. Marshals Service arrested them April 15, 2020, in Shawnee, Okla., after they fled New Mexico.

According to their plea agreements and other court records, Susan Harris acted as president and was the 95-percent owner of Ayudando, while Moore acted as chief financial officer and was a five-percent owner. They engaged in a pattern of criminal conduct from November 2006 to July 2017 that included unlawfully transferring money from client accounts to a comingled account without any client-based justification.  They wrote and endorsed numerous checks, often of more than $10,000, from these comingled accounts to themselves, family members, cash and other parties where payment would benefit their families.

Susan Harris took steps to maintain Ayudando’s appearance of legitimacy, including submitting a proposal to the New Mexico Office of Guardianship that contained numerous false representations, including a false claim that Young was a nationally certified guardian at the time of the submission.

William Harris, who worked as a guardian, admitted that he knew that Moore was siphoning payments to clients from the Department of Veterans Affairs and Social Security Administration and using the money to benefit herself, Harris, and their co-conspirators. Harris specifically admitted receiving, endorsing, and depositing dozens of checks drawn on Ayudando accounts for his own personal benefit. Harris admitted to his involvement in a money laundering scheme, using an Ayudando corporate credit card for personal expenses, knowing that it would be paid for with client money. He also admitted his role in a loan application for the stated purpose of expanding the Ayudando business with the actual intent of using the money to “pay back” clients whose money had been taken without authorization.

The stolen funds were used to fund an extravagant lifestyle, including the purchases of homes, vehicles, luxury RVs and cruises, as well as a private box at “the Pit” at the University of New Mexico. The stolen funds also were used to pay for more than $4.4 million in American Express charges incurred by the defendants and their families.

“The sentences that the defendants have received today are just, and the defendants are fully deserving of them,” said Fred J. Federici, Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Mexico. “The defendants’ conduct in preying upon individuals with special needs, who they were entrusted to protect, was both loathsome and contemptible. We hope that these sentences serve as a warning to others that we will seek to hold accountable anyone who chooses to violate federal law by abusing any similar position of trust for personal enrichment.”

“Taking advantage of disabled veterans and other vulnerable Americans deserves a harsh penalty, especially when those entrusted with their finances instead use the money for vacations and other expensive perks,” said Raul Bujanda, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Albuquerque Field Office. “The FBI will never stop trying to hold such criminals accountable and making sure their victims get justice.”

“This final phase of the investigation will hopefully give some closure to the many victims who have suffered as a result of the selfish acts of the defendants,” said Sonya K. Chavez, United States Marshal for the District of New Mexico. “We at the United States Marshals Service will continue to work diligently with our partners to protect the citizens of New Mexico, particularly those who are most vulnerable.”

“The criminal actions by these defendants were truly brazen and egregious,” stated IRS – Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Albert Childress. “Instead of helping people who placed their trust in them, the defendants were greedy and helped themselves to their clients’ money. They must now pay the consequences for their bad deeds.”

“Today’s sentencing reflects the egregious crimes committed by the defendants, who not only violated the public’s trust but also the trust of a vulnerable population who relied upon them to manage their benefits. We will continue to join our law enforcement partners in investigating organizations and individuals who misuse Social Security benefits that they agreed to manage on behalf of beneficiaries,” said Adam Schneider, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General, Dallas Field Division. “I thank our law enforcement partners for their outstanding investigative work and the District of New Mexico U.S. Attorney’s Office for their efforts in bringing these individuals to justice.” 

“Criminal acts by would-be fiduciaries are most heinous because they violate veterans’ trust and put in jeopardy the benefits on which they are dependent,” said Special Agent in Charge Rebeccalynn Staples, Veterans Affairs, Office of Inspector General. “This sentence should send a clear message that the VA OIG will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to ferret out those who would defraud VA and steal the benefits of deserving veterans.”

Young pleaded guilty Nov. 12, 2019, and was sentenced June 11, 2020, to five years and 11 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Young was ordered to pay approximately $6.8 million in restitution to the victims of the fraud scheme.

Moore pleaded guilty July 11, 2019, and was sentenced March 2, 2020, to 20 years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Moore was ordered to pay the entire amount of stolen funds as restitution to the victims. 

The Albuquerque Field Office of the FBI and the Phoenix Field Office of IRS Criminal Investigation conducted the investigation with the assistance of the Complex Assets Unit and the U.S. Marshals Service, the Criminal Investigations Division of the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General, and the Dallas Field Division of the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jeremy Peña and Brandon L. Fyffe prosecuted the case.

Full Article & Source:

Tuesday, July 20, 2021

Albuquerque couple sentenced to federal prison in Ayudando Guardians case

Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
District of New Mexico


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, July 15, 2021
 

Albuquerque couple sentenced to federal prison in Ayudando Guardians case

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – Susan K. Harris, 74, and William S. Harris, 60, both of Albuquerque, were sentenced today in federal court for conspiracy  to defraud the United States and other financial crimes committed in connection with the operation of Ayudando Guardians, Inc., a non-profit corporation that previously provided guardianship, conservatorship and financial management to hundreds of people with special needs.

Susan Harris was sentenced to 47 years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. William Harris was sentenced to 15 years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Both will be required to pay the entire amount of stolen funds as restitution to the victims. 

A superseding indictment filed on Dec. 5, 2017, charged Susan Harris, William Harris, Sharon A. Moore, 64, and Susan Harris’ son, Craig M. Young, 53, with various financial crimes, including conspiracy  to defraud the United States, mail fraud, aggravated identity theft and money laundering.

Susan Harris pleaded guilty on July 11, 2019, to conspiracy, mail fraud, aggravated identity theft, money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. William Harris pleaded guilty on June 25, 2019, to conspiracy to defraud the United States and to commit money laundering. Both Susan Harris and William Harris were originally scheduled to be sentenced on March 2, 2020, but failed to appear for their sentencing hearing. A bench warrant was issued for their arrest and the U.S. Marshals Service arrested them in Shawnee, Oklahoma, on April 15, 2020, after they fled New Mexico.

According to their plea agreements and other court records, Susan Harris acted as president and was the 95-percent owner of Ayudando, while Moore acted as chief financial officer and was a five-percent owner. They engaged in a pattern of criminal conduct from November 2006 to July 2017 that included unlawfully transferring money from client accounts to a comingled account without any client-based justification.  They wrote and endorsed numerous checks, often of more than $10,000, from these comingled accounts to themselves, family members, cash and other parties where payment would benefit their families.

Susan Harris took steps to maintain Ayudando’s appearance of legitimacy, including submitting a proposal to the New Mexico Office of Guardianship that contained numerous false representations, including a false claim that Young was a nationally certified guardian at the time of the submission.

William Harris, who worked as a guardian, admitted that he knew that Moore was siphoning payments to clients from the Department of Veterans Affairs and Social Security Administration and using the money to benefit herself, Harris, and their co-conspirators. Harris specifically admitted receiving, endorsing, and depositing dozens of checks drawn on Ayudando accounts for his own personal benefit. Harris admitted to his involvement in a money laundering scheme, using an Ayudando corporate credit card for personal expenses, knowing that it would be paid for with client money. He also admitted his role in a loan application for the stated purpose of expanding the Ayudando business with the actual intent of using the money to “pay back” clients whose money had been taken without authorization.

The stolen funds were used to fund an extravagant lifestyle, including the purchases of homes, vehicles, luxury RVs and cruises, as well as a private box at “the Pit” at the University of New Mexico. The stolen funds were also used to pay for more than $4.4 million in American Express charges incurred by the defendants and their families.

“The sentences that the defendants have received today are just, and the defendants are fully deserving of them,” said Fred J. Federici, Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Mexico. “The defendants’ conduct in preying upon individuals with special needs, who they were entrusted to protect, was both loathsome and contemptible. We hope that these sentences serve as a warning to others that we will seek to hold accountable anyone who chooses to violate federal law by abusing any similar position of trust for personal enrichment.”

“Taking advantage of disabled veterans and other vulnerable Americans deserves a harsh penalty, especially when those entrusted with their finances instead use the money for vacations and other expensive perks,” said Raul Bujanda, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Albuquerque Field Office. “The FBI will never stop trying to hold such criminals accountable and making sure their victims get justice.”

“This final phase of the investigation will hopefully give some closure to the many victims who have suffered as a result of the selfish acts of the defendants,” said Sonya K. Chavez, United States Marshal for the District of New Mexico.  “We at the United States Marshals Service will continue to work diligently with our partners to protect the citizens of New Mexico, particularly those who are most vulnerable.”

“The criminal actions by these defendants were truly brazen and egregious,” stated IRS - Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Albert Childress. “Instead of helping people who placed their trust in them, the defendants were greedy and helped themselves to their clients’ money. They must now pay the consequences for their bad deeds.”

“Today's sentencing reflects the egregious crimes committed by the defendants, who not only violated the public’s trust but also the trust of a vulnerable population who relied upon them to manage their benefits. We will continue to join our law enforcement partners in investigating organizations and individuals who misuse Social Security benefits that they agreed to manage on behalf of beneficiaries,” said Adam Schneider, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General, Dallas Field Division. “I thank our law enforcement partners for their outstanding investigative work and the District of New Mexico U.S. Attorney’s Office for their efforts in bringing these individuals to justice.” 

“Criminal acts by would-be fiduciaries are most heinous because they violate veterans’ trust and put in jeopardy the benefits on which they are dependent,” said Special Agent in Charge Rebeccalynn Staples, Veterans Affairs, Office of Inspector General. “This sentence should send a clear message that the VA OIG will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to ferret out those who would defraud VA and steal the benefits of deserving veterans.”

Young pleaded guilty on Nov. 12, 2019, and was sentenced on June 11, 2020, to five years and 11 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Young was ordered to pay approximately $6.8 million in restitution to the victims of the fraud scheme.

Moore pleaded guilty on July 11, 2019, and was sentenced on March 2, 2020, to 20 years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Moore was ordered to pay the entire amount of stolen funds as restitution to the victims. 

The Albuquerque Field Office of the FBI and the Phoenix Field Office of IRS Criminal Investigation conducted the investigation with the assistance of the Complex Assets Unit and the U.S. Marshals Service, the Criminal Investigations Division of the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General, and the Dallas Field Division of the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jeremy Peña and Brandon L. Fyffe prosecuted the case.

# # #

 
Source:

Friday, July 16, 2021

Couple involved in Ayudando Guardians case sentenced

by: KRQE Staff

*Editor’s note below

NEW MEXICO (KRQE) – An Albuquerque couple who stole millions of dollars from veterans and people with disabilities are finally facing their punishment Thursday. Susan and William Harris were sentenced to federal prison. Susan was sentenced to 47 years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release and William was sentenced to 15 years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release.

They plead guilty last year but then skipped town before sentencing. They were arrested a month later in Oklahoma.

Susan was the founder of Ayudando Guardians, a nonprofit contracted by the government to manage the finances of people with special needs, including disabled veterans and those with mental deficiencies. Susan Harris who was president at the time along with her husband used their client’s money as part of the fraud scheme and money laundering conspiracy. According to court records, the stolen funds were used to pay off more than $4.4 million in credit card charges incurred by the defendants and their families.

According to a news release from the U.S. Department of Justice District of New Mexico, the superseding indictment filed on Dec. 5, 2017, charged Susan, William, Sharon A. Moore, 64, and Susan Harris’ son, Craig M. Young, 53, with various financial crimes, including conspiracy to defraud the United States, mail fraud, aggravated identity theft and money laundering.

According to the news release, Susan maintained Ayudando’s appearance of legitimacy, by submitting a proposal to the New Mexico Office of Guardianship that contained false representations, including a false claim that Young was a nationally certified guardian at the time of the submission.

The news release states that William, who worked as a guardian, admitted that he knew that Moore was siphoning payments to clients from the Department of Veterans Affairs and Social Security Administration and using the money for benefit. William admitted receiving, endorsing and depositing dozens of checks drawn on Ayudando accounts for his own personal benefit, according to the news release.

Susan and William will be required to pay the entire amount of stolen funds as restitution to the victims. 

The news release says Young pleaded guilty on Nov. 12, 2019, and was sentenced on June 11, 2020, to five years and 11 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. He was ordered to pay approximately $6.8 million in restitution to the victims.

Moore pleaded guilty on July 11, 2019, and was sentenced on March 2, 2020, to 20 years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release and was ordered to pay the entire amount of stolen funds as restitution to the victims. 

The news release states that the Albuquerque Field Office of the FBI and the Phoenix Field Office of IRS Criminal Investigation conducted the investigation with the assistance of the Complex Assets Unit and the U.S. Marshals Service, the Criminal Investigations Division of the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General, and the Dallas Field Division of the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jeremy Peña and Brandon L. Fyffe prosecuted the case.


In a previous version of this story, it said $11 million in credit card charges were incurred, that is incorrect, $4.4 million in credit card charges was incurred by the defendants and their families.


Full Article & Source:

Saturday, April 13, 2019

Pembroke mom sues 14 officials on behalf of son with special needs

A Pembroke mother and her special-needs adult son were reunited last May after a string of court dates and state guardianship hearings; however, Leonia Sanders has now filed a lawsuit against 14 officials who were involved in her son's court proceedings.

Leonia Sanders, mother of 27-year-old Ronald Sanders, filed a complaint Feb. 13 with the U.S. District Court in Paducah, alleging conspiracy, both individually and collectively, among a host of area officials and mental health employees to violate the civil and constitutional rights of Ronald Sanders, for whom Leonia is also legal guardian, according to the complaint.

The lawsuit lists 14 defendants who were to be served, including the city of Pembroke and its Mayor Judy Peterson; former Pembroke Police Chief Mark Reid; two Christian County Sheriff's Office deputies Eddie Frye and Ricky Burgess; Pennyroyal Mental Health Center and employees Reba Pleasant and Janet Tolliver; four Western State Hospital employees Heather Holland, Lindee Monroe, Rebecca Perry and Susan Redmond-Vaught; and Christian County Attorney's Office staff Lincoln Foster and Maureen Leamy.

Phone calls and an email to the Pembroke City Hall, as well as a voicemail to Christian County Sheriff's Office were not returned. Western State Hospital, Pennyroyal Mental Health and Christian County Attorney's Office spokespersons declined to comment.

Sanders directed all questions to her lawyer, Louisville attorney Chris Hoerter, who said he believes there was wrongdoing and abuse of power in Sander's court and mental health proceedings.

"The objective of the conspiracy was simple," Hoerter said in a written statement to the New Era. "In spite of targeting Ronald and luring him into false arrests, the police and the Christian County prosecutors couldn't convict Ronald Sanders of a crime, because he is incompetent to stand trial, which they knew. And that frustrated them. Since they couldn't criminally confine him because of his intellectual disability, they abused a civil proceeding -- that they intentionally excluded Ronald and his mother from -- which resulted in his illegal placement as a ward of the state into the custody of the Cabinet (for Health and Family Services).

"It was audacious and cruel, and beyond doubt a violation of Ronald Sanders' civil rights," the attorney continued. "Each co-conspirator was instrumental in their own way in depriving Ronald of his rights as an American citizen. And we will prove that. While some of the players were more sophisticated than others in trying to conceal their conduct, no person is above the law."

How did this begin

In July 26, 2017, Ronald Sanders, 25 at the time, was arrested on charges of public intoxication.

According to The Eagle Post archives, Sanders was visiting a friend at a home on North Main Street in Pembroke when sheriff's deputies showed up to give him a sobriety test. The deputies told the homeowner they had received a call of a man trespassing at Bluegrass Apartments.

On a copy of the 9-1-1 call, the chief identifies himself as "Reid" then tells dispatch he received a call about a black male wandering around the apartments with a boom box on his shoulder and a brown paper bag.

"He's usually doesn't cause much trouble," the chief said on the call. "He just sings and wanders around, but she said he's been drinking today."

Reid then identifies Ronald Sanders and said they would probably find him wandering in the area. Deputies found him at his friend's house.

According to the sheriff's report, Ronald Sanders blew 0.04 on the preliminary breath test and was arrested. He was held overnight and released to his mother the next day.

Leonia Sanders believed his arrest was unlawful and filed a complaint against the Christian County Sheriff's Office.

What happened next

On Oct. 23, 2017, Ronald Sanders was charged with third-degree criminal trespassing. According to a memo in that court file, Chief Reid, the complaining witness, states Ronald was seen trespassing at a woman's house on Rosetown Road.

"Subject has been warned, by me, against trespass on this property," the memo reads. "Victim called this a.m. to advise the suspect was knocking on her front window wanting in. She did not respond, she just called the police."

Leonia said the woman had been picking Ronald up occasionally and bringing him to her home, but Leonia asked her to leave Ronald alone, sensing their relationship was inappropriate. Leonia said she told Reid how she felt about it.

"Chief Reid told her to stay off my property and told Ronald to stay off of her property," Leonia told the New Era last year. "But you're talking to someone with a 51 IQ, he doesn't understand."

Ronald was arrested a third time Feb. 13, 2018, at what he and his mother thought would be a comprehensive evaluation with his Pennyroyal Mental Health case worker. Instead, sheriff's deputies arrived to serve a judge's order to take Ronald to an institution in Madisonville because of a missed court date.

Ronald ran from deputies into traffic on Fort Campbell Boulevard and was arrested. Video of the encounter showed Leonia Sanders hysterically screaming and asking why he was being taken away.

According to his court file, a letter from the courts returned undelivered; however, the address it was sent to differed from the correct address his other court documents were sent to. Leonia believes it was sent to the wrong address on purpose.

"I've never missed a court date," she said in 2018. "Anyone will tell you, I'm always on top of things when it comes to my son. I had been getting everything else, so they knew our address."

Court date after court date

Following Ronald Sander's arrest, he was admitted to Western State Hospital for a mental health evaluation and then placed in a home in Madisonville.

All of his criminal charges from July 2017 to February 2018 were dismissed in March 2018 with probable cause, on the suggestion of assistant county attorney at the time Lindsey Adams.

Adams suggested the court drop the charges after the judge-ordered psychiatric examination, stating that their priority became getting Sanders "the help that he needs."

A competency and guardianship hearing was set for a few days later; however, the court proceeding was delayed several times and moved to Madisonville where Ronald Sanders was living at the time.

Prior to the April 2018 hearing, Ronald said "I just want to go home" multiple times before being told he couldn't talk to the media by his state-appointed guardians.

Surrounded by a host of civil rights activists, Leonia Sanders was at the Madisonville hearing pleading to Hopkins District Judge David Massamore to allow her son to come home.

The case was delayed once again when the judge scolded state case workers for doing "sloppy work" because an interdisciplinary mental health evaluation was incomplete in Ronald Sanders' file.

"The report in the record was a medical report, but it had no name on it and there was no way to confirm it was a real person," the judge said in the April 2018 hearing. "I have no clue who filled out the report. It has to be authenticatable."

The judge tasked Rebecca Perry, supervisor for the Western branch of Guardianship Field Services, with getting the correct medical report.

Leonia Sanders also told the judge she had filed a complaint against Reba Pleasant, crisis coordinator for the Pennyroyal Center whom she believed Ronald was staying with in Madisonville. Allegedly, Ronald told his mother the coordinator kissed him, but those claims were never substantiated.

When called about the lawsuit Monday, Pleasant personally declined to comment.

Ronald returns home

In a closed proceeding under KRS 387.770, a jury decided unanimously in May 2018 that Ronald is wholly disabled with regard to his financial affairs and partially disabled in his personal affairs.

Later that month, Leonia Sanders and the Cabinet for Health and Family Services had to prove who would be the better guardian for Ronald.

The judge decided May 29, 2018, that Ronald Sanders could go home to his mother. Judge Massamore advised Leonia Sanders to work closely with the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services.

"We have a safety net in place. Use it," said Massamore in 2018, urging that Leonia Sanders not "make them the enemy."

Filing a lawsuit

Hoerter, a criminal defense attorney in Louisville, said he's never seen a case like this, but he believes it was "hi-tech kidnapping."

"Ronald and his mother were excluded by design from the guardianship hearing that stripped him of his civil rights," the attorney said. "Every American has a constitutional right to a hearing when the government wants to deprive them of life or liberty. That didn't happen here. Even though the guardianship was illegal because of the constitutional violation, for months afterward, the Cabinet and Pennyroyal fought tooth and nail against Leonia from even visiting her son."

The lawsuit complaint alleges, "the defendants did not want him in their community, but they could not criminally confine him, so they conspired to abuse a civil proceeding in order to put Ronald Sanders into custody."

"The defendants' conduct violated the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights to due process and to be free from excessive force and unreasonable seizures, and as a direct and proximate result of the defendants' conduct, the Plaintiffs suffered physical injury, extreme emotional distress, and mental anguish, for which they seek to recover actual, compensatory, and punitive damages."

Hoerter said he decided to represent the Sanders because of "Leonia's courage, and her unwavering dedication to her son," and he looks forward to presenting before a judge.

Currently, motions for default against the Cabinet defendants are pending.

Full Article & Source:
Pembroke mom sues 14 officials on behalf of son with special needs

Saturday, April 14, 2018

Protecting special needs inheritances

I had a client come in this week who was the Social Security payee for her disabled daughter.

Her daughter was on Social Security Disability, Medicare and Medicaid. The father of her daughter recently passed away and was leaving a sizable inheritance to daughter. Mom wanted to know about her daughter's options for the inheritance.

After the consultation, I said this would make a great topic for this week's column and mom agreed. So today, we will be discussing the various options that special needs individuals will have upon the receipt of inheritance from their parents or other loved ones.

No planning.

If the family did no planning, upon receipt of the inheritance, daughter would be immediately disqualified for Medicaid because she had too many assets. The inheritance generally would not affect daughter's Social Security Disability since there are no asset limits with Social Security Disability.

However, had daughter been on Supplemental Security Income instead of Social Security Disability, the inheritance would have disqualified her from Supplemental Security Income since she would also have too many assets.

Once off of Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income, daughter would have to use up the inheritance on medical and other expenses until it is spent down to the asset limits, typically $2,000. Once the inheritance is spent down, daughter could then reapply for Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income.

Financial power of attorney.

In this case, daughter never had a guardian or conservator. Daughter was not deemed mentally incapacitated, but didn't manage her own finances.

Between mom as Social Security payee and daughter's abilities, all of daughter's financial and medical needs have been met and decisions made without the necessity of court approvals of a guardian or conservator. And if daughter has enough capacity to understand who her family is, what assets she owns, who she wanted to benefit, and that a financial power of attorney allowed someone else to handle her finances, she would be able to execute a financial power of attorney. This would allow mom to handle daughter's finances, collect her income and pay her bills.

However, there are three big disadvantages to using a financial power of attorney in this situation. First, it doesn't stop daughter from acting as her own financial agent and accessing the accounts and spending the funds. Since daughter lacked money management skills, this could be very tempting.
Second, daughter can revoke the financial power of attorney at any time. It lacks any type of permanent protection; if daughter revokes it, she no longer has a financial agent and is then in charge of her own finances which is what would offer a little protection for daughter.

Last, just like with no planning, daughter would be disqualified from Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income until the assets were spent down to the asset limit level and then she would have to reapply for Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income.

Conservatorship.

Mom could petition the probate court, with or without daughter's consent, for a conservatorship to manage daughter's finances. This would have a high likelihood of being granted because daughter lacks the ability to manage her own finances, which would be dissipated if daughter took control. Mom and the court would be in control.

Although a conservatorship does offer great protections for the funds and finances for daughter, the conservatorship also has more disadvantages and more restrictions on the funds than most of the other options we are discussing today.

First, the conservatorship hearings and files are generally open to the public at the probate court. Anyone can watch the hearing or review the file.

Second, the conservatorship would generally be supervised by the probate court for daughter's lifetime so long as there are still funds unspent. The conservator must file annual accounting with the probate court for its review. It is not uncommon for the probate court to place restrictions on the amounts that the conservator may spend without court approval, such as no more than $200 per month or $1,000 per year over and above the normal monthly recurring expenses. If mom wanted to buy some new appliances for daughter's home or fix daughter's roof, mom would have to file a petition with probate court and ask the judge for permission for those expenditures.

Last, just as with no planning and a financial power of attorney, daughter would be disqualified from Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income until the conservatorship assets were spent down to the asset limit level and then she would have to reapply for Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income.

First-party special needs trust.

Mom could take some action before daughter receives the inheritance from dad's estate. Mom could set up what is called a first-party special needs trust. This is called a first-party special needs trust because it uses a special needs beneficiary's own assets.

Although this trust can be set up directly by certain relatives, we usually use the probate court to set up these trusts in order to get court approval and give notice to the world that we are seeking this type of protection.

Once set up and funds deposited, mom as trustee and her co-trustees, if any, are the only ones who are authorized to handle the trust funds for the benefit of daughter. Daughter has no power to revoke the trust without petitioning the probate court.

In most instances once the trust is set up, there's no longer any court supervision. However, annual accountings are still needed to be provided to at least the beneficiary. In addition there annual trust tax returns because it is considered a separate tax-paying entity. The trustee or trustees have full access to the funds to be used for the benefit of the beneficiary.

The biggest advantage of a first-party special needs trust is that the assets in the trust do not disqualify daughter from Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income or most other governmental benefits that have an income or asset test.

There is, however, one big downside of a first-party special needs trust, if there's anything left in the trust after the death of daughter, it must be paid back to the governmental entities providing Medicaid or other governmental benefits. This is why this first-party special needs trust is sometimes referred to as a Medicaid pay-back trust.

Pre-planning for gifts and inheritances with a third-party special needs trust.

If mom wants to make a current gift or leave an inheritance to daughter she could have her cake and eat it too. Mom can make a gift or leave an inheritance to daughter in a third–party special needs trust without disqualifying daughter from Medicaid, or other income or asset-based governmental benefits such as Supplemental Security Income. This is called a third-party special needs trust because it uses a third-party's assets, not the special needs beneficiary's own assets.

A third-party special needs trust has all the benefits of a first-party special needs trust. Once set up, mom as trustee and her co-trustees, if any, are the only ones who are authorized to handle the trust funds for the benefit of daughter. Daughter has no power to revoke the trust without petitioning the probate court. There's no court supervision. The assets in the trust do not disqualify daughter from Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income or most other governmental benefits that have an income or asset test.

The biggest benefit of a third-party special needs trust is that if there's anything left in the trust after the death of daughter, it does not have to be paid back to the governmental entities providing Medicaid and or other governmental benefits. Mom can leave it to anyone she wants.

What to do?

In most instances, the best protection for your special needs loved one is a stand-alone first-party or third-party special needs trust that only provides for your special needs loved one. This stand-alone special needs trust should not be included within your revocable living trust and would have only the minimum provisions required to prevent the trust assets from being considered for any income or asset-based governmental benefits, but still provide for your special needs loved one.

With a special needs trust, you can have a happier special needs loved one, enrich his or her life and make it more enjoyable and fulfilled.

Matthew M. Wallace is an attorney and CPA with the Wallace Law Firm, PC in Port Huron and can be reached at 810-985-4320, matt@happylaw.com or www.happylaw.com.
 
Full Article & Source:
Protecting special needs inheritances

Friday, January 6, 2017

Caregiving Costly For Special Needs Families

Families of children with special needs provide billions of dollars in unpaid medical care each year, researchers say, significantly compromising their own ability to earn a living.

Data collected from more than 40,000 parents or guardians of those with special needs across the country suggests that about half of these kids — some 5.6 million children — need assistance at home with managing everything from feeding to breathing equipment and physical therapy.

“If parents did not provide this care at home, children would need to stay in the hospital longer, professionals would need to come to the home or children might not get the care that their physicians prescribe,” said Mark Schuster, chief of general pediatrics at Boston Children’s Hospital and a senior investigator on the study which was published recently in the journal Pediatrics.

“Parents want to do everything they can for their children, but it can be a real challenge to juggle their ill child, their other children and sometimes their job,” he said.

All told, families provide nearly $36 billion worth of care annually, the study found. On average, kids with special needs received 5.1 hours of medical care from family members each week, but that figure grew to 11.2 hours weekly for those with intellectual disability and 14.4 hours for those with cerebral palsy.

These estimates don’t factor time families spend helping with daily activities like bathing and dressing, researchers said.

The findings come from an analysis of data collected through the 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs.

Families lose out on an estimated $3,200 in earnings per year related to their medical caregiving responsibilities for each child, the study found, or over $17 billion collectively. If they were to hire aides to provide medical care, it would run between $2,100 and $6,400 annually per child, costs that researchers said can be prohibitive for many families.

Beyond the financial toll, those behind that study noted that the added responsibilities of providing medical care for a child can also bring emotional stress.

“We need to do a better job of training family caregivers in how to take care of their children at home, and we need better supports for them,” Schuster said.

Full Article & Source:
Caregiving Costly For Special Needs Families

Friday, December 9, 2016

FBCSO: 7 special needs children kept in horrific conditions

RICHMOND, TEXAS - A Richmond couple has been charged with keeping seven special needs children locked up in a filthy bedroom of their home for more than a decade.

Paula Sinclair, 54, and Allen Richardson, 78, were arrested Saturday by Fort Bend County deputies. Both are charged with aggravated kidnapping and injury to a child.

The children, ages 13 to 16, are being treated for malnourishment, dehydration, bed bug bites and other issues. Investigators say they were fed only rice and beans twice a day since they were babies.

One of the children suffers from Down Syndrome and was wearing a dirty diaper when he was removed from the home.

The children were rescued from the home in the Long Meadow Farm subdivision two days before Thanksgiving. All seven were found locked in a room on the second-story of the large home.

“Smelled of feces and urine. The carpet was being pulled up in some places exposing sharp metal tacks,” said Fort Bend County Detective Julie Johnson.

The children weren't allowed to leave the house, had never been treated by doctors or allowed to go to school, according to Fort Bend County investigators.

If Sinclair left the home, the children were locked in a closet, roughly five feet by eight feet. The closet already had clothes and boxes inside, so space was even smaller, and quite often the adults were gone so long that the children would urinate on themselves, the Fort Bend County Sheriff's Office said.

“They were told that if they came out of the room or out of the locked closet, they would be physically abused,” Detective Johnson said.  (Click to Continue)

Full Article & Source:
FBCSO: 7 special needs children kept in horrific conditions

Friday, October 14, 2016

Boy with special needs poured in gasoline, set on fire

A young Texas boy is fighting to stay alive after being set on fire.

Kayden has special needs. The boy's mother says he was playing in a field with two other children, when one boy poured gas on him and another set him on fire.

Kayden has burns on more than 20 percent of his body.

The family plans to press criminal charges against the people they think are responsible for the fire.

Full Article & Source:
Boy with special needs poured in gasoline, set on fire