Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Nursing home workers accused of duct-taping elderly dementia patient to chair

Lashron Williams, Phygelle Brudent, Sherlie Tesyeux
BOYNTON BEACH, Fla. (AP/WSVN) — Three Florida nursing home employees are charged with using duct tape to restrain and quiet a patient with dementia.

Boynton Beach Police said 52-year-old Lashron Williams and 44-year-old Phygelle Brudent duct-taped a 67-year-old woman to a chair and used tape to cover her mouth. They were arrested July 12th and charged with elder abuse and false imprisonment.

A third nursing home employee, 27-year-old Sherlie Tesyeux, was arrested Sunday at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport after returning from Haiti, police said.

Detectives say Brudent confessed to duct-taping the victim July 3rd. According to the Palm Beach Post, Brudent told officers she tied the woman up with cloth pajama pants and used duct tape to bind her hands and feet. She also put the tape over her mouth to “prevent her from screaming,” the arrest report says.

Williams told police Brudent duct-taped the victim. She said she uncovered the patient’s mouth to give her sleeping pills. She said she told Brudent it was wrong to duct-tape patients, but did not report her.

A probable cause affidavit says Tesyeux was present when the victim was restrained, but did not stop nor report what the others did.


Full Article & Source:
Nursing home workers accused of duct-taping elderly dementia patient to chair

While visiting my dying stepmother, I discovered her children had looted my father’s estate

Dear Moneyist,
 
My father passed in 2001. He married his wife in 1971 when I was 14. I have two blood siblings, and my step-mother had one daughter; they are very close. My stepmother is now 91 and in failing health. My wife and I traveled 1,000 miles to stay with her during her recovery from pneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease last week. We have always gotten along well together and, over the years, my siblings have been very nice to her.
‘I realized I was looking at the looting of my dad’s estate—and all the money had been drained by my step-sister and her husband.’
Before my dad passed, we had a frank and clear discussion about his estate. He had worked and invested and had more than $1 million in his estate, which he clearly stated to me was to be split four equal ways upon the death of his wife. She was also provided for by his company’s life insurance policy, and the $600,000 from the sale of his Southern California home.

During our visit, she offered to have us stay in her home. I was going through the old picture albums, and taking some cell phone camera shots of my kids. There weren’t a lot, mostly of her daughter.

One of the picture albums had financial documents in it, and I soon realized I was looking at the looting of my dad’s estate—and all the money had been drained by my step-sister and her husband.

I’d like to say I was shocked, but really it was almost a validation. My stepsister’s husband has been on disability for 18 years. Each year, their whole family of 6 takes at least 2 cruises. They drive new cars, and there was plenty of money for my stepsister to buy a business for her son.

I didn’t see the will when my dad died, but somehow he left it so that in certain circumstance, if his wife’s income fell to a certain level, they were able to access my dad’s estate principle. In 2009, my stepsister and her husband took out a $750,000 single-premium life insurance on my stepmom.

They borrowed $617,000 from my father’s life insurance policy, and the surrender value and death benefit are now about $120,000. They also wrote my stepmom’s trust and so that my stepsister gets 75% of any distribution, and the other three kids share equally of the remaining 25%.

My stepmom brought very little in assets into the marriage—just a small home in California, which wasn’t worth much. She had no other major assets. The life insurance policy was paid in full at the time of issue, and the money had to come from my father’s estate. Even if we fight it now, the money has been gone for 9 years, and now that stepmom is in poor health we can see that, from our expected $250,000 distribution from dad’s estate, the blood issue kids will be very lucky to get even $5,000 after probate and taxes.

I am lucky that I’ve worked hard and invested well that it won’t be a problem for my wife and I. My brother is on a pension from the state of California and is OK, but my sister and husband are going to be hit hard by this. She has been counting on that estate for 20 years to fund her own retirement, and it’s not going to be there.

A word of warning to your readers: Don’t trust anyone. I’m going to get a lawyer, and fight it for the hell of it, but even after I win a judgment, the money has been spent, and we’ll never get anything out of it. Any other suggestions?

Distraught

Dear Distraught,
 
These stepsiblings are absolutely attempting to cheat you out of your inheritance.

If your father did not leave a will, the probate court should have divided the estate in accordance with the law in the state of California. If you father died intestate (without a will) in California, community property goes to the surviving spouse, receives one-third of the total separate property if there’s more than one child with the rest divided among the children. Gather any documents you can on your stepfamily’s financial transactions as evidence, obtained legally. But it may be too late.

There is a statute of limitations on an oral promise in California. “The applicable statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit to enforce an oral promise to make a will or trust is one year from the date of death of the person,” according to Sweeney Probate Law, which has offices across the state. Anyone contesting a will has 120 days after it has been admitted to probate.

You may have better luck with the statute of limitations in relation to fraud. You must file a lawsuit within three years of discovering the fraud or three years “within reasonable diligence” where you could have discovered those facts. The latter sounds like a more moveable date that is open to challenge. Your lawyer will best advice you on your options.

Your stepmother may or may not have been an accomplice to these transactions. What is clear: Your stepsiblings saw an opportunity to transfer this wealth. Obtain a copy of all life insurance policies, compile a timeline of events. You may have a case for breach of contract of the life insurance policy and/or elder abuse (if your stepsiblings carried out these shenanigans while your stepmother was mentally impaired) and even fraudulent wire transfer.

If you have an experienced probate attorney, he/she may have another solution relating to fraud. But you may be out of luck. You were correct not to rely on your stepmother and her family to honor your father’s wishes, but the statute of limitations and trying to find money after it’s been drained from multiple accounts present dual challenges for you. If nothing else, it serves as a timely warning to leave nothing to chance.

Full Article & Source:
While visiting my dying stepmother, I discovered her children had looted my father’s estate

Monday, October 8, 2018

Tonight on Marti Oakley's TS Radio Network: Guest Erin Dakins


5:00 pm PST … 6:00 pm MST … 7:00 pm CST … 8:00 pm EST

Former host of The Truth Traveler Radio Show and guest/program producer for two other talk shows, Erin Dakins will be on TS Radio Network tonight with Marti Oakley to discuss lack of patient care and over dosing of pharmaceuticals in the elderly......all from a personal perspective.

DRUGS! The perfect way to make an elderly person appear "incapacitated". And! they help keep the victim quiet so they don't complain about the lack of care or neglect in these warehouses they call nursing homes or residential homes.

The drugging of America's elderly is a rapidly growing epidemic. Palliative care is a euphemism for terminal sedation in most cases. Not only have they targeted the elderly for theft of estates, stolen their identity's and handed everything over to these for-profit predators, they have now come up with a perfect plan for wiping them out. Drugs are the answer and also quite profitable for the medical and pharmaceutical industries.

LISTEN to the show LIVE or listen to the archive later

From AARP: What Happens When a Guardianship Gets Contentious



by Kenneth Miller:
Larry Davis tried his best to help his stepmother, but distance made it difficult. Davis lived with his wife in Sonoma County, Calif.; Kise (pronounced KEEˇ-say) Davis lived in Las Cruces, N.M., 1,200 miles away. She was struggling with dementia, and Larry, who held power of attorney over her affairs, spoke with her regularly, kept tabs on her via local contacts and visited as often as he could. He was working toward moving her to an assisted living facility near his home.

That began to seem more urgent in the fall of 2016, when Kise, then 85, began complaining that a longtime acquaintance, Larry Franco — a handyman who helped her with household tasks — was stealing from her. But Kise’s illness sometimes made her paranoid; she’d lodged such accusations against friends before. Larry, who was 74, planned to fly out and investigate after the holidays. Then, shortly before Christmas, he came home from a shopping trip to learn that Kise had gone missing.

“This is Kise’s neighbor Donnie,” said the voice on the answering machine. “I thought you should know that a van just came and took her to some kind of institution.”

Terrified that harm had come to Kise, Larry called Franco and demanded to know what was going on. “I got in over my head,” Franco told him. He explained that Kise had transferred her power of attorney (POA) to him, then turned suspicious and hostile. Franco’s lawyer had advised him that the best way to ensure Kise was properly cared for was to petition a judge to appoint a professional guardian, who would take over legal responsibility for her well-being.

Kise’s newly appointed guardian, a company called Advocate Services of Las Cruces, had placed her in a dementia-care facility by order of the court. It took Larry more than a week to reach her there. When they finally spoke, on Christmas Eve, she seemed to believe she’d booked herself a room, though now they wouldn’t let her go.

Larry was furious that no one had informed him before letting strangers lock her away, but he assumed he could quickly set things right.

He was wrong.

Full Article and Source:
What Happens When a Guardianship Gets Contentious

See Also:
NASGA: Power of Attorney

"You go there to die." Family describes nightmare getting uncle out of nursing home.

Click to Watch Video
On April 2, Ron Arnold was admitted to Safire Care Rehabilitation of the Northtowns on Sheridan Drive. He needed rehab after a fall. His family had no idea he would essentially be stuck there until August 22, despite months of trying to get him out.

"It's like a sequence of lies on purpose to delay the process or sabotage the process and cause chaos," Gregory Mikolajczak, Arnold's nephew and healthcare proxy, said.

The plan, originally, was to bring Arnold home after he finished rehab. Mikolajczak told Safire's social worker if his uncle needed to be placed in long term care, they had another WNY facility already lined up.

But, according to Mikolajczak, Safire moved Arnold into their own long term care without notifying Mikolajczak, who, as healthcare proxy, was charged with making medical decisions on behalf of his uncle.

"If you questioned anything it was most unwelcome," Arnold said, describing his time at Safire. "It was quite touch and go several times with some of the staff."

Those concerns, along with Mikolajczak's assessment of the cleanliness and treatment provided to his uncle, made their desire to get him out all the more urgent.

"You're worried about him and what are you going to do 300 miles away? You have to keep coming up. It really was a time. My heart hurt," Mikolajczak said. He was traveling from his home in Pennsylvania to help his uncle.

When Mikolajczak learned his uncle was in long term care at Safire in late April, he started the process of transferring Arnold to a separate facility. Long term care is not covered by Arnold's insurance and the new place would be more affordable for the family.

Despite having a doctor's clearance and the new facility ready to house Arnold, Mikolajczak says the social worker at Safire would not fill out necessary paperwork and schedule a final medical test for discharge, intentionally delaying the process and holding his uncle there for months longer than necessary.

In the middle of this process, Arnold had to be admitted to ECMC for dehydration. Mikolajczak feared the worst should he be unable to get his uncle out.

"That they're going to kill him," he said. "Due to lack of nourishment and hydration and air conditioning and care. I've been told by his friends and stuff that that's a last resort place to go. You go there to die."

Eventually, the family did get Arnold out. He says he is much happier at his new home and is settling in well.

The final bill from Safire totaled $46,959.14. According to Mikolajczak, had he been able to transfer his uncle before the initiation of long term care, he would have saved about $43,000.

The New York State Department of Health gives Safire Northtowns a one-star rating, its lowest possible. Between June 2014 and May 2018, state inspections turned up 94 citations, nearly triple the state average of 33 in that same period of time. You can read the state's evaluation on the facility and see detailed reports of citations here.

7 Eyewitness News reached out to Safire Care Rehabilitation of the Northtowns for comment on this story. A staff member told 7 Eyewitness News reporter Josh Bazan by phone that a manager would call back Friday afternoon. No call has been received.

The 7 Eyewitness News I-Team investigated a different nursing home operated by the same ownership group in February. That home was Safire Care in South Buffalo. The I-Team found a pattern of serious mistakes and dangerous living conditions. You can read that report here.

Full Article & Source:
"You go there to die." Family describes nightmare getting uncle out of nursing home.

Group home worker accused of selling teen in program for sex

Ashley Goodrich - Click to watch video
SAUGUS, Mass. — A Lynn woman was indicted in connection with trafficking a minor for sexual servitude in Boston and Worcester from a Saugus group home where she worked and where the victim lived, Attorney General Maura Healey said. Ashley Goodrich, 27, was indicted Thursday by a grand jury on four charges of trafficking of a minor for sexual servitude, one count of deriving support from prostitution of a minor and four counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor in connection with trafficking a minor for commercial sexual exploitation.

Goodrich, a former employee of Eliot Community Human Services, targeted and recruited the minor while working at the group residence, investigators said.

Goodrich posted ads online offering sexual services in exchange for money, investigators said.

Goodrich then drove the minor to these sexual encounters in Boston and Worcester and coordinated them during times when the minor had run away from the home, investigators said.

Goodrich was arraigned and released on personal recognizance.

The residence was a home for minors referred from the Department of Children and Families to provide congregate care for adolescents and was operated by Eliot in Saugus.

Full Article & Source:
Group home worker accused of selling teen in program for sex

Sunday, October 7, 2018

Britney Spears’ Net Worth: The Truth About Her Spending Habits and How She Still Makes Millions Today

Britney Spears is one of the biggest pop stars on the planet, and one of the richest. Here’s what she spends her money on and how she still continues to rake in millions today.

Starting out


Before she was a household name, Spears made her nationwide singing debut on the competition show Star Search back in 1992. While she didn’t win, her appearance on the show opened doors for her and she ended up being cast on Disney’s The All-New Mickey Mouse Club alongside other future stars like Justin Timberlake and Christina Aguilera.

Making it big


In 1999, Spears became a pop sensation with the release of her single “Baby One More Time.” The song was an instant hit and sold more than 500,000 copies within its first day of being released.

The singer continued to put out successful albums in the early 2000s and also starred in movies including the film Crossroads. She then appeared on a reality TV show with her ex-husband, Kevin Federline. In 2012, Spears served as a judge on The X-Factor and banked $15 million for one season.

Other ventures


Aside from releasing one hit after another and her film and TV gigs, Spears earned some serious cash from endorsements. The pop princess had deals with top brands like Pepsi, American Express, McDonald’s, Home Depot, Verizon, Amazon, Google, Visa, Colgate, Estee Lauder, Priceline, and Comcast to name a few.

In addition, she has her fragrance line in partnership with Elizabeth Arden. And of course, her Las Vegas residency at Planet Hollywood which started in 2012 and became one of the most successful residencies ever in Sin City. Forbes noted that she made well over $100 million from the show.

A substantial amount of her money has come from touring and in August 2018, she began her Piece of Me tour in the United Kingdom.

Her net worth


All that has given her an impressive net worth of around $215 million. The number is according to Celebrity Net Worth and may differ from some other estimates you have read. That’s because some publications only list a fortune of $41 million that was put in a trust years ago after her public meltdown and today is controlled by her father, Jamie Spears. A common question many people have is how long will the conservatorship remain in place?

“As long as she is bringing in so much money and as long as the lawyers and conservators are getting paid, there is little incentive to end it,” Elaine Renoire, president of the National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse, told The New York Times. “Usually, the conservatorship just keeps going unless the conservatee makes a fuss or the family does.”

How she spends her money


So how does the “Oops!… I Did It Again” artist spend her money? Well, as E! News noted, Spears shops at a lot of the same retailers we all do such as Target, Old Navy, Macy’s, and TJ Maxx. She also picks up clothing for herself and her sons at stores like Nike, Dicks Sporting Goods, and Adidas.

Some of her other expenses though differ from everyday folks as she pays for bodyguards, a legal team, and maintaining her home’s elevator.

It’s good to be Britney!

Full Article & Source:
Britney Spears’ Net Worth: The Truth About Her Spending Habits and How She Still Makes Millions Today

Lack of judicial transparency in Colorado is intolerable but there is hope

A Denver Post reporter’s terrific series on how state courts have suppressed thousands of lawsuits and criminal cases from public view has prodded the judicial branch into pledging belated reform. But don’t celebrate yet. Final victory for judicial transparency in Colorado is a long way off.

And fixing one of the obstacles may require the intervention of the highest court in the land.

In his reports, The Post’s David Migoya revealed that “someone could be arrested, charged, convicted and sentenced for a crime in Colorado without anyone outside of law enforcement ever knowing who, how, why or whether the process was fair.” That’s intolerable on many levels, which is perhaps why the state court system has bestirred itself and announced that suppression orders and their legal justification may soon be made public. We shall see.

But suppression orders aren’t the only way courts prevent citizens from monitoring their activities. Another threat — thanks to a deplorable ruling this year by the Colorado Supreme Court — is the nearly unlimited authority of judges to bar public access to court documents without so much as offering a legal justification, even in a capital murder case of intense public interest that was sullied by prosecutorial misconduct.

The state high court not only rejected a request by The Colorado Independent, an online publication, to unseal documents in the death-penalty case of Sir Mario Owens, it unanimously dismissed the idea that the public has a constitutional right to inspect any judicial records.

Colorado is now a regressive outlier in terms of access to judicial documents, which is why the Independent’s latest move is so important. On Friday, its attorneys filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to consider the issue.

Seeking Supreme Court review is always a long shot, but this case contains many features that may make it attractive. The high court has clearly stated that “the right to attend criminal trials is implicit in the guarantees of the First Amendment,” but it has never ruled outright on access to court documents. Meanwhile, no fewer than 11 federal Circuit Courts of Appeals and a variety of state courts have recognized a qualified constitutional right for the public to view court files, as the Independent’s petition points out.

Either those courts are wrong or the Colorado Supreme Court is out of line. The highest court in the land should clear the air.

Then there is the nature of the underlying case itself. In pursuing Owens, who was sentenced to death 10 years ago, prosecutors in the 18th Judicial District under DA Carol Chambers cut corners. Among tantalizing facts they failed to properly disclose was that her office promised and later gave a car to a witness.

A lower court ultimately ruled these lapses had not jeopardized Owens’ right to a fair trial — which is certainly plausible — but defense attorneys naturally sought to disqualify the DA’s office from any further role in the case. (By this time Chambers had been replaced by George Brauchler, the current GOP attorney general candidate.) And this is where the Independent enters the fray. It wants to see the motions for and against that request, a transcript to a closed hearing on the matter and the judge’s order rejecting the defense motion. All have been sealed without explanation.

If there is confidential information in the documents, the court could have said so. But for all we know, the records were sealed to protect the DA’s office from embarrassment and pointed questions. It is simply staggering that our state Supreme Court believes the public has no right to know the truth. As the Independent’s petition points out, public access to the judicial system “discourages perjury, misconduct, and bias that can thrive in secrecy” while promoting the “perception of fairness.”

Nor is access to criminal trials alone sufficient in an age when “less than five percent of all felony cases” even go to trial. “Even entirely public proceedings cannot easily be followed or fully comprehended by the press and public without access to the pleadings, motion papers and documentary evidence that are the focus of those proceedings,” the petition rightly observes.

Yet instead of affirming a qualified right to inspect judicial records, Colorado Supreme Court Justice Melissa Hart delivered a sloppy and dismissive opinion that failed even to frame the issue correctly. She said the Independent sought “unfettered access” and “a constitutional right of access to any and all records in cases involving a matter of public concern,” neither of which is true.

But true or not, the damage is done. Judges in Colorado have the green light to seal a vast array of records, and then hide their reasons for doing so, without fear of impinging on a foundational right.

Fortunately, there are two possible avenues of relief. The first is the legislature, which should enshrine a presumptive right of public access to “all judicial proceedings, related documents and exhibits” except in certain well-defined situations. That’s the American Bar Association’s recommendation.

The second avenue is the U.S. Supreme Court. Let’s hope it takes the bait.

Full Article & Source: 
Lack of judicial transparency in Colorado is intolerable but there is hope

Docs: 89-year-old tortured, maimed, sexually abused

Marcine Herinck
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) -- Chris Blair, the pastor at Crossroads Church, the place where Marcine Herinck used to pray, said family and friends had been preparing for the worst when they learned of her disappearance.

On Wednesday, over a week after her body was found in the trunk of a car, the man suspected of killing her was indicted on 23 charges, including 13 counts of aggravated murder. Additionally, the Multnomah County District Attorney's Office said 58-year-old Timothy Mackley caused Herinck's death by "intentional torture and intentional maiming."

"We kind of were prepared for the worst," Blair said, "and this sounds like it was the worst."

Mackley, according to the indictment, kidnapped, sexually abused and tortured Herinck over a six-day span before killing her. Mackley did not appear in a court procedure Thursday morning. His arraignment was set over until November 7, a move agreed to by both the DA and the defense team.

Herinck's son Jeff Herinck told KOIN 6 News via phone Wednesday that he hadn't seen the indictment, but, "I can't fathom what happened."

Mackley's other charges include: one count of intentional murder, four counts of burglary, two counts of second-degree kidnapping, two counts of first-degree sexual abuse and one count of abuse of a corpse.

"I'm glad we stopped him in his tracks before he could hurt anyone else," Jeff Herinck told KOIN.

Herinck was reported missing on Sept. 19 and her body was found on Sept. 24 in the trunk of the car Mackley was driving. ​​​​​​She was last seen the day before when a family member took her home from a shift at a thrift store where she volunteered.

Mackley was caught on surveillance video in the shop, where Herinck family members say there may have been a confrontation between him and Marcine.

"We heard he may have dropped a cell phone in the store and my mom accused him of looking up her dress," Jeff Herinck said in a press conference last week. "He was ordered out of the store, he came back and apologized and then mom went missing."

Back at the Crossroads Church, Blair said the people that knew Herinck, a wonderful person who they said lived an exemplary life, are devastated.

"There's nothing you can say in a situation like this other than letting people know you're with them and praying for them," Blair said.

And as tough as it is to process, Blair said something like this doesn't test faith.

"It tests your forgiveness," Blair said.

"It's a clear cut case here of good versus evil."

Mackley will appear in court again on January 17, 2019.

Full Article & Source:
Docs: 89-year-old tortured, maimed, sexually abused