Tuesday, April 13, 2021

Man in hospital with COVID-19 after receiving Johnson & Johnson vaccine

By Elizabeth Rosner
 
A New Jersey man is in the hospital with COVID-19 — just five weeks after being vaccinated.

Francisco Cosme, 52, was ecstatic when he booked an appointment for the one-dose Johnson & Johnson vaccine at the Javits Center on March 6.

After Cosme was vaccinated, he continued to wear a mask and follow social distancing guidelines but he became “very confused and began doing things that were not normal,” his daughter, Michelle Torres, told The Post.  

“April 1 was the very first day he started to have symptoms,” Torres said. “He had a cough, fever, chills, everything.”

The 31-year-old drove her father to a clinic where he tested positive for COVID-19 and he was instructed to quarantine for 10 days.

Francisco Cosme, the New Jersey man who was hospitalized with COVID-19 despite being fully vaccinated.
Michelle Torres
Last week, his condition worsened and Torres noticed he had trouble breathing and called 911 during a visit to his home in Edison, New Jersey.

After giving Cosme oxygen, the ambulance crew rushed him to John F. Kennedy Medical Center, where he is in critical condition and is also being treated for pneumonia.

“I’m trying to hold it together, every day you don’t know what is happening,” said a tearful Torres.

“The doctor said they did all they can do it and it’s up to him to fight and up to God.”

Torres told The Post her mother, husband and children ended up testing positive for COVID and are in quarantine until next Sunday.

“We survived the whole year without it [vaccine] doing all the things we are supposed to so do — social distancing, washing hands and masking up,” she explained.

“It’s crazy and we need answers,” Torres concluded.

The Post also reported that a Brooklyn woman who got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine at the Javits Center on March 10 contracted COVID-19.

Full Article & Source:

Disbarred Brooklyn lawyer charged with stealing down payment on home

Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez. Eagle file photo by Rob Abruzzese

An East Flatbush man has been indicted by the Brooklyn District Attorney’s Office on a grand larceny charge for allegedly stealing the down payment for the purchase of a Brownsville home whose seller he represented. The defendant also allegedly separately borrowed $14,000 from the client and never paid it back.
  
Gonzalez identified the defendant as Gerald Douglas, 52, of East Flatbush. He was arraigned today before Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Sharen Hudson on an indictment in which he is charged with second-degree grand larceny. He was released without bail and ordered to return to court on May 12, 2021.
 
According to the DA’s Office, the defendant represented a 76-year-old woman in the sale of her Brownsville home, negotiating the contract for her in September 2018. A down payment of $71,700 was allegedly deposited into the defendant’s escrow account. 

The closing occurred in August 2019, by which time the defendant had allegedly stopped returning his client’s phone calls, and she was forced to retain new counsel to close the transaction. The client received the sale proceeds at the closing but not the down payment, despite repeated requests to the defendant, according to the charges.
 
It is further alleged that in June and July 2018, Douglas asked the same client if she would loan him money, first $6,000 and then $8,000. He allegedly told her he was expecting a rental payment for a property he owned in Flatbush, although in fact the property had gone into foreclosure five years earlier and he was no longer the owner.

Gonzalez commented, “The victim in this case was allegedly defrauded of a large sum of money by her own attorney, who had a legal duty to protect her interests. I would like to thank my Public Integrity Bureau for its hard work in seeking to hold the defendant accountable for his alleged criminal act and betrayal of trust.”
 
Douglas was disbarred by the Appellate Division Second Department in 2019.
 
The case is being prosecuted by Senior Assistant District Attorney Adam Libove of the District Attorney’s Public Integrity Bureau, under the supervision of Assistant District Attorney Laura Neubauer, bureau chief, and Assistant District Attorney Michel Spanakos, deputy chief of the District Attorney’s Investigations Division.

Full Article & Source:

Palm Beach County healthcare agency sees new demand for different type of home care

Click to Watch Video

By: Sabirah Rayford

BOCA RATON, Fla. — A Palm Beach County healthcare agency is seeing a new demand for a different type of home care: professional companions.

Henry and September are great pals.

“She’s got a very nice nature,” Henry said.

The 95-year-old Holocaust survivor says they have a lot in common.

“Jeopardy and Wheel of Fortune,” Henry said.

September is a professional companion.

“Companion care are services provided to seniors who are semi-independent, but they may need someone to be like a buddy or an assistant to them,” Marissa Gordon said.

Gordon is an administrator at JFS at Home, a licensed private duty home health agency serving Palm Beach County.

“We always knew there was a tremendous need for this, but families were reaching out to us expressing the need for someone to get their eyes on their loved one because they were unable to travel,” she said.

With 160 clients, she says seniors in isolation also increased the demand for companions.

"Increased loneliness and depression,” Gordon said. “I think that the pandemic opened the door a little wider for senior to accept help.”

Creating new bonds in a new world.

“We know each other, basically like we are best friends,” September said.

If you'd like to apply to be a professional companion, visit ralesjfs.org/

Full Article & Source:

Monday, April 12, 2021

Police seek home health aide’s arrest in murder of 75-year-old in Rocky Hill

By Jessika Harkay and Christine Dempsey

The state police are asking for the public’s help in finding a home health aide suspected in the beating death of a 75-year-old Rocky Hill man this week.

Melissa Feliciano, 31, is wanted for arrest on charges of felony murder, murder, first-degree robbery and sixth-degree larceny in the death of Robert Iacobucci.

Her mugshot, from June 2020, is the most recent picture police have of Feliciano, they said.

Melissa Feliciano is wanted on murder charges in the beating death of Robert Iacobucci, 75, of Rocky Hill, state police say.
Melissa Feliciano is wanted on murder charges in the beating death of Robert Iacobucci, 75, of Rocky Hill, state police say. (Provided by the Connecticut State Police)
Feliciano is described as 5-foot-2, 85 pounds with brown hair and brown eyes. Police said they don’t know if she has any weapons.

State police said Feliciano has moved around a lot, with various addresses on file, but is known to frequent the Hartford and Manchester area.

Feliciano, a native to Delaware, may have left the state, police added. “It’s always a concern,” they said Thursday afternoon.

The 31-year-old has two pending cases in community court in Hartford, according to online court records. She was arrested in Rocky Hill on Dec. 28, 2019, and charged with second-degree criminal trespass. A second-degree failure to appear charge was added to the case Feb. 4, 2020.

In the second case, Feliciano was charged by West Hartford police with interfering with an officer on Nov. 11, 2020. She’s due back in court on May 27 in both cases.

Anyone with information as to the whereabouts of Feliciano is asked to call Det. Christopher Scott at the Troop H barracks in Hartford at 860-534-1000.

Melissa Feliciano is a murder suspect in the beating death of 75-year-old Robert Iacobucci of Rocky Hill, state police say.

Feliciano is one of three people who police believe were involved in the homicide earlier this week. Franklyn Cruz, 42, and Madeline Dickey, 35, were arrested after a witness alerted police to what had happened in Iacobucci’s house on Pondside Lane, state police said.

Iacobucci was found dead on the second floor of his home Monday, with his hands tied and injuries to his face and head, state police said.

A police report released Tuesday recounted the series of events that led to Iacobucci’s murder, including interviews from the witness and Dickey and Cruz themselves.

Cruz and Dickey told police that Feliciano was Iacobucci’s home health aide, but they haven’t been able to verify that information yet, state police said.

Dickey also told police that the attack began when Feliciano complained about how she was treated poorly by Iacobbuci and convinced her and Cruz to “scare him” into giving them money. The trio went to Rocky Hill around 1 a.m. Monday, and Cruz and Feliciano tied up and beat the 75-year-old, while Dickey waited in the garage and played with his dog, she said.

Following the attack, the couple said they dropped off Feliciano in Hartford. She hasn’t been seen since.

Later Monday morning, Cruz and Dickey returned to Iacobucci’s home to check on him, Dickey said. They discovered the attack had left the man dead. The couple decided to steal Iacobucci’s German shepherd, one of his cars and other items, instead of calling 911, the police report said.
 
They then met up with an acquaintance and Cruz told him about a plan to move the body, to make “it appear [Iacobucci] voluntarily left with a prostitute, then move themselves into his residence, essentially taking it over,” the police report said.
 
 The acquaintance called Rocky Hill police to conduct a wellness check, and officers found that one of Iacobucci’s two vehicles was stolen and his phone was answered by a woman who said her name was “Melissa,” but she couldn’t explain why she had Iacobucci’s phone, police began to investigate further.

Police interviewed the acquaintance Monday, and he added that he recently met with the couple again that day and that they were planning to go home, change clothing, change the license plate on the stolen vehicle then dispose of Iacobucci’s body, the police report said.

Police arrested Dickey and Cruz outside their New Britain residence. Inside the home, they also found Iacobucci’s dog, who is safe, healthy and with Iacobucci’s family members, Brian Foley, a spokesman for the state police, said Thursday afternoon.

Cruz’s bail was set at $2 million and his next court date is scheduled for April 28. Dickey’s was set at $1 million; she is due in court April 27.

Full Article & Source:

Embattled Cleveland Municipal Court Judge Pinkey Carr accused of more inappropriate behavior in new disciplinary complaint

 By Cory Shaffer

CLEVELAND, Ohio — A state disciplinary attorney issued a 118-page complaint against a Cleveland Municipal Court judge who, in spring 2020, ignored a directive to stop holding hearings because of the pandemic.

The new complaint filed Friday against Judge Pinkey Carr says she routinely flouted court rules and antagonized defendants, lawyers and court staff from the bench. It accuses the former city and county prosecutor of making inappropriate jokes about fictional strip clubs and says she issued arrest warrants for people who did not show up to court hearings that she scheduled without telling them.

Carr ran afoul of rules that require judges to conduct themselves fair and impartially, uphold the public’s confidence in the judiciary and maintain proper courtroom decorum.

The sweeping complaint comes as Carr is already facing disciplinary proceedings for violating an administrative order limiting court hearings due to the coronavirus. She also made false statements to a TV station and another judge denying that she issued warrants for people who did not show up for hearings after the court announced it was postponing them.

Other findings in the complaint say Carr:

  • Negotiated plea deals with defendants without a prosecutor or defense attorney present
  • Cracked jokes at the expense of defendants
  • Waived court costs and fines without asking whether they could afford to pay them and filing fictitious paperwork with the court
  • Presided over court hearings in workout clothes and no robe, prompting one defendant to ask court staff if a judge planned to attend the hearing

Assistant disciplinary counsel Michell Hall wrote that Carr’s conduct violated multiple rules of professional conduct. Hall requested that the Board of Professional Conduct and the Ohio Supreme Court sanction Carr.

Carr has until April 15 to file a response to the amended complaint.

A request for comment from Carr sent to court spokesman Ed “Flash” Ferenc was not immediately returned Friday evening.

Friday’s complaint says Carr conducted several improper hearings with defendants charged with low-level misdemeanor charges who appeared without an attorney. She quizzed them about the facts of their cases, the complaint says.

Many of the cases involved people charged with alcohol-related offenses. She mocked one man charged with violating open-container laws for drinking cheap beer and joked in the courtroom about how long it would take him to pay a $25 fine.

She also prevented defendants from leaving her courtroom so she could continue to joke about them with her staff, the complaint says. One man was accused of violating a protection order for texting a woman that a man she was with was a “f--k boy.” After he left, Carr joked with her bailiff about asking him what that term meant. She then directed someone from the court to get the man from the hallway and bring him back so she could ask him. When he returned, she asked him what it meant, then told him not to bother answering and told him to leave again. She then laughed with her staff and continued talking about the case while the next defendant waited for their hearing, the complaint said.

Carr also made jokes from the bench about P-Valley, the name of a Starz TV show about a strip-club in Mississipi, the complaint said. She joked about taking a court bailiff there and then asked about a female attorney who appeared in her courtroom who she referred to as “cute.”

The complaint also said that Carr once yelled at an assistant public defender when he told a man charged in connection with a shootout that he didn’t have to answer when Carr asked what the word “firefight” meant. Carr chastised the attorney and said she could ask any question she wanted to.

The attorney asked Carr to wear her mask if she was going to yell. The next day when the same attorney was in her courtroom, Carr wore her mask below her chin and asked her bailiff to use a tape measure to count the number of feet the attorney was away, then continuously mocked the attorney for his concern over the coronavirus.

She routinely berates defendants who call her “ma’am” by referring to them as “little boy” and “little girl.” One elderly defendant repeatedly answered Carr’s questions with “yes ma’am” and “no ma’am.” As the woman walked out of the courtroom, Carr muttered loud enough for people in the courtroom to hear about how she wanted to punch the woman in the face.

The complaint also criticizes Carr for abusing the capias process in cases where she ordered people to pay fines without going through the clerk of court’s office. She regularly orders defendants to pay fines by a specific date, then schedules a hearing on their ability to pay a few days later if they fail to meet the deadline. If the defendants don’t show up to the hearing, she issues an arrest warrant that also includes an order barring them from qualifying for programs that allow them to pay their fines through community service, guaranteeing their arrest, the complaint said. In at least one case, Carr never told the defendant that she set the hearing, the complaint said.

When he didn’t show up, she issued the warrant, and he spent a total of five days in jail because he didn’t pay a fine for a misdemeanor traffic case, the complaint said.

Friday’s complaint is in addition to disciplinary counsel Joseph Caligiuri’s complaint recommending Carr be disciplined for violating six rules of judicial and professional conduct. Among other things, those rules require judges to promote public confidence in the judiciary and bar attorneys from engaging in “conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.”

Cleveland.com reported last March that Carr held court hearings in violation of the order that Administrative Judge Michelle Earley issued order postponing all court hearings for defendants who were not already in jail to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The March 13 order was posted on the court’s website and distributed to media outlets, who reported that the court hearings had been closed.

Cleveland.com reported on March 17 that Carr had held hearings that did not follow Earley’s order on the previous two days and issued capiases -- or arrest warrants -- for people who did not show up.

Carr, who did not return requests for comment from cleveland.com at the time, granted an interview to WJW Channel 8 reporter Peggy Gallek and said while on the bench in her courtroom that cleveland.com’s report was false and that she worried it would make people think they had to come to court or else she would issue arrest warrants for them.

After the interview concluded, courtroom video obtained by cleveland.com showed Carr went on to issue arrest warrants for 17 people who did not show up to her courtroom and issuing bonds for their eventual arrest. The video also showed Carr mocked an assistant public defender who had asked if he could tell his clients they didn’t need to come to court the next day in keeping with Earley’s order. Carr rejected his requested, and after the lawyer left the room, Carr turned to a member of her staff and referred to him as “little idiot.”

Cleveland.com later reported on the videos, and Carr, who again did not return cleveland.com’s requests for comments, told WJW Channel 8 that she did not know that when she marked a defendant’s failure to appear that a warrant would be issued for that person’s arrest.

Caligiuri’s complaint also included a text message exchange between Carr and Earley later that day. Carr again called cleveland.com’s reporting “reckless” and “inaccurate.” Earley asked Carr if she issued arrest warrants, and Carr responded that her journal entries clearly stated “no warrant to issue,” according to the complaint.

Full Article & Source:
Embattled Cleveland Municipal Court Judge Pinkey Carr accused of more inappropriate behavior in new disciplinary complaint 

Woman Who Loves Horses Gets The Sweetest Surprise In Her Final Days

By Stephen Messenger

When Rita Meredith was younger, she had earned the distinction of being the first woman to serve as a mounted police officer in the United Kingdom. But clearly, working alongside horses was something far more than just a job.

And decades later, her love for those animals never faded. And it showed.

Posted by Emily Sykes on Tuesday, March 9, 2021

Meredith, who later moved to Australia, passed away earlier this month at a New South Wales hospice facility. But her final days were among her most joyous, thanks to a very special surprise visit she received.

"Her main wish before she passed was to smell/see a horse for one more time," Sykes wrote.

Meredith's final wish was fulfilled.

Posted by Emily Sykes on Monday, March 8, 2021

Learning of Meredith's desire to be in the company of horses one last time, members of the NSW mounted police decided to drop by the hospice facility for a meet and greet.

"They travelled all the way to Newcastle today to see Rita and make her wish come true," Sykes wrote. "Police officers Graham and Nicole were accompanied by the very handsome Hollywood and Don, and they sure made Rita’s day."

Posted by Emily Sykes on Monday, March 8, 2021

According to Sykes, Meredith gave the horses apples and plenty of pets. It was a chance for her to reconnect with animals she'd long held dear.

Posted by Emily Sykes on Monday, March 8, 2021

"There were plenty of tears shed and beautiful memories made," Sykes wrote.

Posted by Emily Sykes on Monday, March 8, 2021

Meredith reportedly passed away two days after that special surprise. The legacy of her lifetime of love for horses, however, lives on in the hearts of all who knew her. And to see her final with fulfilled is something Meredith's family won't soon forget.

"I cannot thank the NSW police for making this happen," Sykes wrote. "You have made this lovely lady's wish come true, and did it with such professionalism, respect and grace. On behalf of Rita’s family and friends, THANK YOU!"


Full Article & Source:

Sunday, April 11, 2021

New Mexico legalizes assisted suicide

Oleksandr Lysenko/Shutterstock

New Mexico’s governor on Thursday signed a bill legalizing assisted suicide in the state.

Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) signed the “Elizabeth Whitefield End of Life Options Act,” named for a late state district court judge who died of cancer in 2018, and who became an advocate for assisted-suicide in her final years.

The bill allows licensed physicians, osteopathic physicians, nurses, and physician assistants to prescribe a lethal dose of medication for terminally-ill patients who are deemed capable of self-administering the dose.

New Mexico is now the eighth state to have legalized physician-assisted suicide, along with California, Colorado, Hawaii, Montana, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. The District of Columbia has also legalized the practice.

The state’s Catholic bishops had strongly opposed the bill, which was passed by the House in February and by the Senate in March, largely along a party-line vote.

Archbishop John Wester of Santa Fe stated on March 3 that the legislation was “the worst in the nation.”

“God’s law calls us all to recognize and protect the life and dignity of each and every human being, especially the most vulnerable. This includes unborn children and those at the end of life,” he stated. “We are promised that God’s law will ultimately bring peace and new life, especially to those who are suffering.”

The bill requires two licensed health care providers, one of them a doctor, to determine a patient’s terminal illness. Patients in hospice do not require a second confirmation.

If the patient has a history of a mental health disorder or intellectual disability – or if the providers believe they have a disorder – they must be referred for a mental health assessment before a prescription is filled.

For the request for a lethal dose of medication, two witnesses must be present, and only one may be a relative of the patient. The bill requires a 48-hour waiting period between the prescription being written and it being filed.

Some amendments in the bill were struck before it passed the state Senate. Amendments allowing for insurance collection and waiving liability for health care providers were removed, AP reported.

The bill still contains a state residency requirement, which a 2019 version of the legislation did not include. Some critics warned that the previous bill would have enabled “suicide tourism” where patients would travel from out-of-state to receive a lethal prescription. That bill also allowed for lethal prescriptions to be issued remotely through telemedicine.

The 2021 bill does include a conscience exemption for health care providers who refuse to provide a lethal prescription, but it requires them to inform the patient and refer them to another provider who will provide the prescription.

Full Article & Source:

LA judge disciplined a third time for bad behavior on bench

By BRIAN MELLEY

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A Los Angeles County judge with a history of bad behavior has been disciplined for being irritable with defense lawyers and telling an acquitted man that “there’s no question in my mind that you’re guilty.”

Judge Patrick Connolly was publicly admonished for displaying improper demeanor toward two criminal defense lawyers and for an inappropriate remark after a jury verdict, the Commission on Judicial Performance said Friday.

It was the third time Connolly has been disciplined since he became a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge in 2009. He was admonished in 2016 for abusing his authority by conducting a hearing to determine if a defense lawyer should face contempt charges. He was privately admonished in 2010 for using profanity with lawyers. 

Connolly, a former gang prosecutor who presides in the Compton courthouse, told a man acquitted in a shooting case in 2018 that he was lucky.

“Let me tell you, you’ve been given a gift from God,” Connolly told Eugene Germany. “Because there’s no question in my mind that you’re guilty of this crime.”

Germany and a co-defendant had been charged with opening fire at a fleeing vehicle after the driver had stabbed one of their friends.

Connolly appeared to chastise Germany, for not accepting a plea deal that would have sent him and a co-defendant, Dalisha Monique Jordan, to prison for six years if they both agreed to plead guilty.

Jordan wanted to accept the plea offer, but it was relinquished when Germany rejected it.

“I’ll tell you, chivalry is not dead,” Connolly told Germany. “If you’d taken the deal, Ms. Jordan would have had that six-year deal. She’s going to get a lot more time than that. So, you know, take that into consideration.”

Jordan was sentenced to 14 years in prison.

In another instance last year, Connolly was irritable with defense lawyers who had requested to appear at an arraignment by telephone because they feared they had been exposed to COVID-19. Connolly had agreed to the telephone hearing but then appeared to hold it against the lawyers and their clients.

The attorneys for brothers Jorge and Felipe Ramirez, who were charged with assaulting a police officer, asked that their clients be released without bail because of concerns they could be susceptible to coronavirus in jail.

Defense lawyer Martin Lijtmaer said he had letters attesting to his client’s health and the judge repeatedly snapped: “How am I going to see that letter, if you’re not in my courtroom?”

Lijtmaer tried to respond, saying, “Your honor, respectfully, the reason I didn’t ... ” before being cut off.

“Respectfully?” Connolly said. “You have not come to the courtroom.”

Connolly refused to release either man without bail.

Lijtmaer said his client and brother had to post “ridiculously high bail” that has nearly bankrupted their family. He said the cases both ended without prison time and the charges will ultimately be dismissed.

Connolly acknowledged he “spoke too sharply” to the lawyers and asked the commission to consider “the highly unusual circumstances” that the hearing was just a day after Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a stay-home order.

The commission said Connolly did not acknowledge his misconduct or show contrition.

Connolly did not immediately return a message seeking comment left with his courtroom clerk.

Full Article & Source: 

Many long-term care staffers refused the vaccine. Now they have more infections than residents.

By Cindy Krischer Goodman, Kate Santich and Adelaide Chen

Nurse Eva Diaz administers the Pfizer vaccine to Pam Peters a nurse practitioner at John Knox Village, Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2020, in Pompano Beach, Fla. Many long term care workers have declined the COVID vaccine. (Marta Lavandier/AP)

At Florida’s long-term care facilities, more workers are now infected with COVID-19 than elderly residents, a dramatic shift from earlier in the pandemic.

Despite state and federal attempts to offer vaccinations at all nursing homes and assisted-living centers in the state, 62% of staffers have declined — posing the single biggest threat to the more than 25,000 elderly people in those facilities who are also unvaccinated.

“These are the folks from the beginning that were bringing it in,” said Mary Daniel of Jacksonville, a caregiver and advocate for families of residents. “It’s frustrating. Staff members are choosing not to get the vaccine and it’s the residents who are getting punished because their families are getting locked out again.”

As of April 9, 344 of Florida’s long-term care workers tested positive for COVID, compared to 276 residents. The good news is overall cases are down — only a tenth of what they were in January, according to state data.

But while infections in residents continue to decline, cases among workers have plateaued, or in some instances, begun to tick upward in recent days. These are mostly low-paid workers who are in close contact with elderly residents.

Nursing homes are mandated to test their workers regularly for COVID-19 but assisted living facilities are not. So it’s possible not all cases are reported. Most homes continue to require masks and check the temperatures of staff daily to spot symptomatic workers with COVID before they expose others.

But mandating vaccination is highly controversial.

“Some workers are totally against it,” said Pascal Bergeron, chairman of North Lake Assisted Living in Hollywood and CEO of ALF BOSS, an assisting living resource agency. “They are scared to death of it, and forcing it on them would probably cause some to quit.”

The low vaccination rate is worrisome in workers who care for the group most vulnerable to COVID-19, particularly when some residents did not get vaccinated either. The Agency for Health Care Administration reports that 82% of residents are vaccinated.

Kristen Knapp, communications director for the Florida Health Care Association, which represents nursing homes, said a combination of factors exists for why some of these vulnerable residents still aren’t fully vaccinated: Some are new admissions, others declined as a personal choice or their family declined for them. And some have underlying conditions that put them at risk.

But the effort to inoculate both residents and staff isn’t over, Knapp said. (Click to continue reading)

Full Article & Source: