GOLDEN, Colo. — A 50-year-old Monument woman was sentenced to four
years in prison for bilking an elderly Westminster man out of more than
$69,000.
Nahid “Venus” Moshrefi was convicted in July
of theft of an at-risk elder and criminal exploitation of an at-risk
elder. It deliberated four hours after a four-day trial before returning
the verdicts on July 24.
She had faced up to 24 years in prison.
Moshrefi met 80-year-old William Maruca on the Live Links dating service.
The two began dating in 2013. Eventually, she told him she had
cancer. Moshrefi testified before the jury that she did not have cancer.
The jury heard testimony from two employees from a FirstBank branch where the victim had an account.
Officials had called the Westminster Police Department, which kick-started a mandatory report of suspected elder abuse.
The employees told the jury that the victim had written multiple checks to Moshrefi for large sums of money.
When police contacted Maruca, he told them he paid for Moshrefi’s doctor visits and treatment.
He said Moshrefi told him that without treatments, she had five or six months to live.
Maruca said he was convinced Moshrefi had cancer because of the pain she appeared to be suffering.
He also said their relationship was kept secret because it was
against her religion to be with a white man when she is unmarried.
Moshrefi’s husband testified that they had been married for 13 years.
Moshrefi owns Holistic Healing Health in Colorado Springs, and advertises herself as Dr. Venus K. Moshrefi.
On cross-examination, she said she is not a licensed medical doctor in Colorado.
Maruca’s cousin testified that Moshrefi had prescribed more than 36 supplements for him costing more than $80,000.
Maruca paid for trips to California, Hawaii and Australia for
Moshrefi. She told him that she had family in Australia that she would
never see again because she was dying. He also bought Moshrefi a car.
Full Article & Source:
Woman sentenced to 4 years in prison for faking cancer to steal from at-risk elderly man
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Monday, September 11, 2017
Tonight on T. S. Radio: Is Mass Murder Happening in Montgomery County, PA?
5:00 pm PST … 6:00 pm MST … 7:00 pm CST … 8:00 pm EST
Guests: Coz Whitten-Skaife, Mary Whitten and other family members.
This is a show you do not want to miss!
Pennsylvania appears to be about to exceed Florida and Tennessee in its abuse of the elderly by corrupt probate courts, for-profit guardians, unethical attorney's and their constant companions...the participating nursing homes.
In what has to be one of the most extreme cases of probate abuse with the intent to exploit the estate, Harvey Whitten is that case. Highly educated and successful, Harvey became a prime target for the predators in Montgomery County, PA due to a stroke. Harvey never had a chance to recover. F. Harvey Whitten who suffered from vascular dementia, was being chemically restrained with Haldol.
This was done without the family's knowledge. Haldol is not appropriate for use on those over 60, nor those with dementia. F. Harvey Whitten is a veteran of the Korean War, and now a victim of Montgomery County Orphans (probate) court. Deborah Klock, a nurse, was named to replace Harvey's companion who had passed away, as co-guardian on November 16, 2012 by Judge Stanley Ott, of the Orphan’s Court of Montgomery County. Ott dismissed Whitten’s request for his own counsel and ordered Diane Zabowski to act as his counsel and it was she who named Nurse Klock as co-guardian.
Both Mary and Coz told RebelPundit that Klock exhibited problems right away. Mary Whitten especially has written numerous complaints against Klock in which she alleges: Klock impersonated a family member, made herself the emergency contact, and changed the medication without notifying the family. The Whitten family fought a long and bitter battle to save their uncle from the ravages of the probate system.
LISTEN to the show live or listen to the archive later
See Also:
NASGA - Harvey Whitten, Pennsylvania Victim
Florida Supreme Court remands case involving incapacitated person's right to marry
TALLAHASSEE — The Florida Supreme Court has quashed the decision of a lower court in a case concerning whether a marriage can be voided, according to an Aug. 31 court opinion.
Glenda Martinez Smith petitioned the court after her marriage to J. Alan Smith was deemed invalid because of his incapacitated state.
Glenda Smith and Alan Smith were engaged in 2009, a year before he was in a car accident that left him with head trauma and partially incapacitated. When a Florida resident is described in this state, a guardianship has the authority to take some rights, including marriage. Still, there was a question of whether the couple needed to receive approval from the court before they tied the knot in 2011, even though they were engaged before he was deemed incapacitated.
John Cramer was given the guardianship title over Alan Smith’s affairs. Glenda Smith requested that Cramer petition the court for approval but he “refused,” according to court records.
Lynne Hennessey, Alan Smith’s court-appointed counsel then petitioned the court to annul the marriage in early 2013 under the notion that the court did not approve the marriage beforehand.
In the trial court, Glenda Smith moved to validate the marriage, and Hennessy motioned for summary judgment. A court denied her request and granted Hennessy’s.
Glenda Smith then appealed the judgment of annulment with the 4th District Court of Appeal, stating that Florida laws did not require approval of marriage before the actual ceremony but that it could be ratified afterward. She then referred to a case in 2012 that involved Alan Smith being moved to another living facility and said the court acknowledged her marriage at the hearing.
Still, the district court sided with the trial court that “the right to marry” is subject to court approval and that “if a person deemed incapacitated has had his or her right to contract removed, he or she has no right to marry unless the court gives its approval.”
It also stated that since the marriage was considered void in the 2012 hearing, the court’s recognition of the marriage was irrelevant.
Still, Judge Martha C. Warner of the 4th District Court of Appeal challenged the interpretation of some of the Florida statute. She wrote the law “does not state that marriage is prohibited unless approval is given prior to the marriage” and that “the right to marry was not removed from [Alan] at the time of the marriage ceremony.”
Warner added that she “would hold that the failure to obtain court approval prior to the marriage at most rendered the marriage voidable, not void, so that the court could approve the union post-marriage," according to court records.
Glenda Smith then submitted a motion to certify a question of public importance, and the court allowed it.
The state Supreme Court answered the question of whether the Florida statute requires approval from the court before marriage and whether sans the approval, a marriage is considered absolutely void. It also explored the other possibility of whether the marriage would be considered voidable leading to the court’s approval after parties exercise their right to marry.
The Supreme Court decided that a failure to seek court approval before exercising the right to marry “does not render the marriage void or voidable.”
It also decided that court approval is needed for those in Alan Smith’s case who have lost their right to marry. While it stated that “any marriage entered without court approval is invalid,” it pointed out that the law “does not prevent the ward or the intended spouse from seeking court approval after marrying in order to ratify the marriage.”
The Supreme Court quashed the 4th District Court of Appeal's ruling and remanded it to the lower court.
Full Article & Source:
Florida Supreme Court remands case involving incapacitated person's right to marry
Glenda Martinez Smith petitioned the court after her marriage to J. Alan Smith was deemed invalid because of his incapacitated state.
Glenda Smith and Alan Smith were engaged in 2009, a year before he was in a car accident that left him with head trauma and partially incapacitated. When a Florida resident is described in this state, a guardianship has the authority to take some rights, including marriage. Still, there was a question of whether the couple needed to receive approval from the court before they tied the knot in 2011, even though they were engaged before he was deemed incapacitated.
John Cramer was given the guardianship title over Alan Smith’s affairs. Glenda Smith requested that Cramer petition the court for approval but he “refused,” according to court records.
Lynne Hennessey, Alan Smith’s court-appointed counsel then petitioned the court to annul the marriage in early 2013 under the notion that the court did not approve the marriage beforehand.
In the trial court, Glenda Smith moved to validate the marriage, and Hennessy motioned for summary judgment. A court denied her request and granted Hennessy’s.
Glenda Smith then appealed the judgment of annulment with the 4th District Court of Appeal, stating that Florida laws did not require approval of marriage before the actual ceremony but that it could be ratified afterward. She then referred to a case in 2012 that involved Alan Smith being moved to another living facility and said the court acknowledged her marriage at the hearing.
Still, the district court sided with the trial court that “the right to marry” is subject to court approval and that “if a person deemed incapacitated has had his or her right to contract removed, he or she has no right to marry unless the court gives its approval.”
It also stated that since the marriage was considered void in the 2012 hearing, the court’s recognition of the marriage was irrelevant.
Still, Judge Martha C. Warner of the 4th District Court of Appeal challenged the interpretation of some of the Florida statute. She wrote the law “does not state that marriage is prohibited unless approval is given prior to the marriage” and that “the right to marry was not removed from [Alan] at the time of the marriage ceremony.”
Warner added that she “would hold that the failure to obtain court approval prior to the marriage at most rendered the marriage voidable, not void, so that the court could approve the union post-marriage," according to court records.
Glenda Smith then submitted a motion to certify a question of public importance, and the court allowed it.
The state Supreme Court answered the question of whether the Florida statute requires approval from the court before marriage and whether sans the approval, a marriage is considered absolutely void. It also explored the other possibility of whether the marriage would be considered voidable leading to the court’s approval after parties exercise their right to marry.
The Supreme Court decided that a failure to seek court approval before exercising the right to marry “does not render the marriage void or voidable.”
It also decided that court approval is needed for those in Alan Smith’s case who have lost their right to marry. While it stated that “any marriage entered without court approval is invalid,” it pointed out that the law “does not prevent the ward or the intended spouse from seeking court approval after marrying in order to ratify the marriage.”
The Supreme Court quashed the 4th District Court of Appeal's ruling and remanded it to the lower court.
Full Article & Source:
Florida Supreme Court remands case involving incapacitated person's right to marry
Attorney, accused of multiple crimes, still working courthouse halls
Some call him the most troubled lawyer at the Dallas County Courthouse.
An attorney charged with multiple crimes including indecency with a child. And while he's awaiting his trial, many of his colleagues are outraged this attorney is still practicing law.
Two weeks ago, Dallas defense attorney Rayan Ganesh sat alone in a courtroom, for more than an hour, avoiding our cameras as well as serious questions about the charges against him.
In July of last year, Ganesh was arrested on two counts of indecency with a child for exposing himself at his law office. Then in February of this year, Ganesh was indicted on seven counts of barratry, which means illegally soliciting clients. But Ganesh is still practicing law while he awaits his own trial. So, the Dallas County District Attorney's office filed a motion a few weeks ago, asking a judge to keep him away from the courthouse by raising his bond. The judge in his case, Amber Givens-Davis did just that. Yet today he is free on bond, still working the courthouse halls. Presumably representing his more than 650 clients.
That's right, 650 clients.
"For somebody to have 500 active clients right now that gives me great concern that he's not acting in the best interest of his clients," said Dallas criminal defense attorney Peter Schulte. Schulte is just one of several lawyers who provided court testimony against Ganesh after allegedly catching him soliciting clients in the courthouse hallway.
He and other attorneys we talked to feel a normal defense attorney caseload is more like 50 to 100 clients.
Schulte feels more should be done to protect the public from Ganesh whom he feels is doing a disservice to too many clients. Two weeks ago, we found Ganesh pacing the Dallas County courthouse, apparently surveying the hallways for potential clients many of whom were sitting outside various courtrooms awaiting their case hearings.
We specifically watched him engage two individuals who later told us they had in fact hired Ganesh.
One woman, whose identity we agreed to protect, told us $800 to represent her, but only after he approached her.
Again, according to state law, attorneys cannot directly solicit business, even in the courthouse where the woman says she came for her hearing without an attorney.
Another defendant, Marcus Jackson, says Ganesh solicited him in the hallway as well. "He just walked up to me after I hung the phone up and passed me his card," said Jackson. "He literally solicited my business to hire him."
Jackson says he agreed to hire Ganesh, paid him, but was later arrested for not showing up for court. He says Ganesh never told him about the hearing. According to Jackson and a 27-page pleading from the Dallas County District Attorney, Jackson was thrown in jail for 5 days for "failure to appear". "I literally put money in his pocket for nothing," said Jackson. "That's money I could be paying to another lawyer proving my innocence with somebody who is going to help me and keep me free."
We tried to discuss the allegations with Ganesh ago after watching him approach multiple defendants in the courthouse hallway.
Ganesh ultimately chose not to discuss the matter with us at all. Officials with the State Bar say there is little they can do to pull Ganesh's credentials as long as his criminal cases are pending. His trials on barratry and indecent exposure are set for later this month.
READ MORE: Dallas County prosecutors' allegations against Rayan Ganesh.
Full Article & Source:
Attorney, accused of multiple crimes, still working courthouse halls
An attorney charged with multiple crimes including indecency with a child. And while he's awaiting his trial, many of his colleagues are outraged this attorney is still practicing law.
Two weeks ago, Dallas defense attorney Rayan Ganesh sat alone in a courtroom, for more than an hour, avoiding our cameras as well as serious questions about the charges against him.
In July of last year, Ganesh was arrested on two counts of indecency with a child for exposing himself at his law office. Then in February of this year, Ganesh was indicted on seven counts of barratry, which means illegally soliciting clients. But Ganesh is still practicing law while he awaits his own trial. So, the Dallas County District Attorney's office filed a motion a few weeks ago, asking a judge to keep him away from the courthouse by raising his bond. The judge in his case, Amber Givens-Davis did just that. Yet today he is free on bond, still working the courthouse halls. Presumably representing his more than 650 clients.
That's right, 650 clients.
"For somebody to have 500 active clients right now that gives me great concern that he's not acting in the best interest of his clients," said Dallas criminal defense attorney Peter Schulte. Schulte is just one of several lawyers who provided court testimony against Ganesh after allegedly catching him soliciting clients in the courthouse hallway.
He and other attorneys we talked to feel a normal defense attorney caseload is more like 50 to 100 clients.
Schulte feels more should be done to protect the public from Ganesh whom he feels is doing a disservice to too many clients. Two weeks ago, we found Ganesh pacing the Dallas County courthouse, apparently surveying the hallways for potential clients many of whom were sitting outside various courtrooms awaiting their case hearings.
We specifically watched him engage two individuals who later told us they had in fact hired Ganesh.
One woman, whose identity we agreed to protect, told us $800 to represent her, but only after he approached her.
Again, according to state law, attorneys cannot directly solicit business, even in the courthouse where the woman says she came for her hearing without an attorney.
Another defendant, Marcus Jackson, says Ganesh solicited him in the hallway as well. "He just walked up to me after I hung the phone up and passed me his card," said Jackson. "He literally solicited my business to hire him."
Jackson says he agreed to hire Ganesh, paid him, but was later arrested for not showing up for court. He says Ganesh never told him about the hearing. According to Jackson and a 27-page pleading from the Dallas County District Attorney, Jackson was thrown in jail for 5 days for "failure to appear". "I literally put money in his pocket for nothing," said Jackson. "That's money I could be paying to another lawyer proving my innocence with somebody who is going to help me and keep me free."
We tried to discuss the allegations with Ganesh ago after watching him approach multiple defendants in the courthouse hallway.
Ganesh ultimately chose not to discuss the matter with us at all. Officials with the State Bar say there is little they can do to pull Ganesh's credentials as long as his criminal cases are pending. His trials on barratry and indecent exposure are set for later this month.
READ MORE: Dallas County prosecutors' allegations against Rayan Ganesh.
Full Article & Source:
Attorney, accused of multiple crimes, still working courthouse halls
Doctors pressured this woman to die by euthanasia. One year later she is much better.
Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director - Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Last month Candice Lewis's mother received a disappointing response from the local hospital after sending an official complaint about being pressured by doctors who wanted Candice to die by euthanasia.
Mother upset after doctor urged her to approve assisted suicide for her daughter with disabilities.
An article by Stephen Roberts that was published in the Northern Pen newspaper on August 28 explained that Candice is doing much better after receiving excellent care from a hospital in St Johns's Newfoundland. The article reported:
Full Article & Source:
Doctors pressured this woman to die by euthanasia. One year later she is much better.
Executive Director - Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
![]() |
| Candice Lewis |
Last month Candice Lewis's mother received a disappointing response from the local hospital after sending an official complaint about being pressured by doctors who wanted Candice to die by euthanasia.
Mother upset after doctor urged her to approve assisted suicide for her daughter with disabilities.
An article by Stephen Roberts that was published in the Northern Pen newspaper on August 28 explained that Candice is doing much better after receiving excellent care from a hospital in St Johns's Newfoundland. The article reported:
According to her mom, Sheila Elson, Candice hasn’t been having any seizures, is now able to feed herself, walk with assistance, use her iPad, and is more alert, energetic and communicative since her stay in St. John’s.
“She’s back to about where she was five or six years ago,” says Elson.
After a two-week hospital stay, Candice, along with her mother, walked her sister Glennis down the aisle at her wedding in Dildo in August.
She’s been able to do all this despite the fact that in 2016, doctors suggested that Candice might be dying.
In September of that year, a doctor at Charles S. Curtis Memorial Hospital in St. Anthony had also suggested to Elson that physician-assisted death could be an option for Candice.
What is satisfying her these days is her daughter’s health. Since returning to St. Anthony earlier this month, Candice hasn’t required a visit to the hospital.
Elson believes Candice’s condition has improved because she is now on fewer medications.
Legalizing
euthanasia (MAiD) gives physicians the right in law to lethally inject
their patients. The doctors attitude toward Candice's "quality of life"
were based on negative and discriminatory attitudes towards the lives of
people with disabilities. The doctors thought that Candice was better
off dead.
Full Article & Source:
Doctors pressured this woman to die by euthanasia. One year later she is much better.
Sunday, September 10, 2017
Tonight on T. S. Radio: Mary Bush & Genevieve's Nightmare
Mary Bush continues to fight to free her mother Genevieve Bush from the ravages of the fraudulent guardianship her mother was sentenced to in 2011.
Chester County Pa Orphans Court continues to extract Genevieve's wealth to feed court appointed profiteers while disregardining multiple petitions filed by Mary for her mother's health care needs not being met. In January 2016 after Mary got her mother out of the nursing facility via 911 with broken bones and untreated heart problems, the nursing home and for profit guardian immediately retaliated by calling Mary a trespasser. Mary who lives about 15 miles from the locked in facility where her mother is, has not seen her mother since January 2016. Mary has since discovered and reported to Chester County Adult Protective Services that her mother again has not seen her cardiologist for a year and a half.
After filing another petition to the court to get her mother to her doctor, the court issued an order stating "I will not micromanage (Guardianship Services of Pennsylvania) care decisions absent compelling reasons". The court also ordered that Mary who is her mother's legal health care agent is to " cease and desist" "scheduling appointments for her mother". If guardianship is about protecting vulnerable older adults, then who is the Court really protecting?
LISTEN to the show live or listen to the archive later
See Also:
NASGA: Genevieve Bush, Pennsylvania Victim
Alzheimer’s patient was sexually abused, state says. Now nursing home says it’s closing
![]() |
| Eagle Crest nursing home |
For 37 months, the Eagle Crest nursing home, formerly known as Carmichael Care & Rehabilitation Center, was on the federal government’s consumer-beware list of troubled facilities. Other facilities nationwide came and went from the list, but Eagle Crest remained, supposedly operating under stepped-up scrutiny intended to nudge it back into compliance.
In June, the state had had enough.
Documents obtained late Friday from the California Department of Public Health show that the state recommended this summer that federal regulators drop the facility from its Medicare provider rolls, a drastic action that strips a nursing home of its critical government funding.
Instead, the nursing home’s owner acted first.
The company took issue with the state, though, noting that the 126-bed facility had self-reported the allegation of sexual abuse in February. The company disputed the state’s findings that an “immediate jeopardy” citation was warranted or even that the facility was out of compliance at all.
A finding of immediate jeopardy, known as an IJ, is a heart-stopper for nursing home operators and can carry among the steepest penalties. Immediate jeopardy is called when a provider’s noncompliance has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm or death to a resident.
In its investigation, the state found that the female patient, who had Alzheimer’s disease, had been fondled, kissed and abused by a male resident who was known to be a risk for inappropriate sexual behaviors and had a “history of inappropriate touching of a confused patient,” state documents show. Even so, the male resident, who the state report described as “cognitively intact,” was not receiving one-on-one monitoring, the report says.
The facility’s failure to safeguard the woman had placed all 36 female residents at risk for sexual abuse, the state found.
The facility had self-reported to the state that the man had been found in February in the woman’s room, pulling up his pants while she lay fully undressed in her bed, documents show.
On June 22, the state notified Eagle Crest administrator Harumi Hurrianko it was recommending that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services terminate its provider agreement. A month later, a lawyer for Genesis notified the state it would voluntarily close, calling the immediate jeopardy citation the “straw that brings us to make this difficult decision.”
The closure of one of the region’s largest skilled nursing facilities startled elder care advocates this week. They say they are worried about the loss of beds and the stress placed on vulnerable residents suddenly being forced to relocate, possibly out of the county. The single-story beige building is located along a busy stretch of Fair Oaks Boulevard, about a mile west of the boundary between Carmichael and Fair Oaks.
Over the years, Eagle Crest has had its share of notoriety, including a rash of state citations and fines, numerous federal deficiencies and generally poor ratings. Some recent inspection reports show the facility has been written up and penalized for inadequately treating or preventing bed sores, failing to self-report possible abuse and not attempting CPR on a resident who wished to be resuscitated.
But none of the health care advocates contacted by The Bee late this week was aware of the sexual abuse allegations that preceded the company’s decision to close.
“This really caught us off-guard,” said California’s long-term care ombudsman, Joe Rodrigues, reacting to the closure news. He noted that the local ombudman’s office first learned about the company’s closure plans around mid-August.
“This is going to have a big impact; it’s such a large facility,” Rodrigues said. “Where are we going to find homes for these people? And why are they closing this facility in the first place?”
A spokeswoman for Genesis Healthcare, Jeanne Moore, would not say why the facility was closing. But Moore offered assurances in an email that the facility is coordinating the closure with the California Department of Public Heath and “will comply with the requirements for closing a nursing center.” Closure will be around Oct. 20, she said.
“We will continue our day-to-day care and operations during this process until our last patient or resident is transferred and the center is closed,” she stated. “We will take all reasonable precautions to eliminate or reduce any negative effects that may result from the transfer.”
She specifically cited three other facilities owned by Genesis in Northern California that could take residents from Eagle Crest: American River Care Center in Carmichael, Creekside Center in Stockton and Willows Center in Willows.
Two of those facilities have had their own alleged quality issues, with both American River and Willows Center receiving “below-average” ratings in an ongoing statistical analysis of California nursing homes by the University of California, San Francisco. The database, which examines numerous aspects of facilities from staffing ratios to complaints to deficiency trends, was created to help consumers make long-term care choices.
Eagle Crest currently has an overall “poor” rating, while Creekside Center was deemed “superior” in the ratings available on the CalQualityCare.org website.
Of the 59 nursing homes in the four-county region, only 15, or about a quarter, have more licensed beds than Eagle Crest. Genesis informed the California Employment Development Department that 72 jobs also would be lost in the closure.
A spokeswoman for the California Department of Public Health, which licenses and inspects nursing homes, said the state approved the closure and relocation plan on Aug. 4.
Under California law, if 10 or more residents are likely to be moved due to a change in a nursing home’s operation, the facility must submit a proposed relocation plan to the state and cannot proceed until it’s approved. Whenever homes close, advocates worry about possible “transfer trauma,” in which the upheaval and separation from family, friends and known caregivers can cause serious harm and even death to fragile residents.
“People who live in nursing homes are extremely vulnerable,” said Michael Connors of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, based in San Francisco. “Separating them from everyone and everything they care about is cruel and traumatic.”
Transfer trauma has become a hot topic in California. Outrage erupted last year in Humboldt County over the prospect of widespread transfer trauma when the state’s largest nursing home owner, Shlomo Rechnitz of Los Angeles, threatened to close three of his facilities in the remote region. Before Rechnitz significantly modified his plan, some patients were facing the possibility of moving hundreds of miles away.
As a result, Assemblymen Jim Wood, D-Healdsburg, introduced a bill that would increase the amount of advance warning that residents and others receive prior to a nursing home closure. AB 275 was signed by the governor on Friday.
Even before the Eagle Crest shutdown, the Genesis chain of nursing homes had been facing widespread regulatory and public-relations problems.
In June, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that Genesis HealthCare Inc. would pay the government nearly $54 million to settle six federal lawsuits. The government alleged that companies and facilities acquired by Genesis had submitted false claims to government health care programs for medically unnecessary services, and “grossly substandard nursing care.”
A 2014 Bee investigation found that nursing homes operated in California by Genesis HealthCare received complaints of abuse at seven times the statewide average. The company is headquartered in Kennett Square, Pa.
The closure of Eagle Crest illustrates the difficulty regulators have in pushing operators to make improvements amid accusations of substandard care – even when they are publicly shamed by government inspectors.
Eagle Crest spent more than three years on the “Special Focus Facility List” maintained by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The list is a kind of improve-or-else warning program aimed at getting operators to correct serious problems, or lose their ability to collect government funding.
Special Focus Facilities are surveyed more frequently and, if problems persist, are subject to possible fines and other penalties, including termination from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
On the latest list, updated Aug. 17, only one nursing home out of 118 nationwide that were publicly identified had been on the list longer than Eagle Crest.
“It’s a token enforcement program that’s done a poor job of turning around dangerous nursing homes,” said elder-care advocate Connors. “The question is, what’s wrong with the system if the worst of the worst are under all this scrutiny – then why aren’t they getting better?”
California, with 1,241 licensed skilled nursing facilities, currently has seven nursing homes on the feds’ consumer-beware list. One, in Fairfield, has “shown improvement,” the list reveals, while another in Los Angeles is said to have recently graduated.
The other California homes, including Eagle Crest, are defined by the government as having “serious quality issues” and have been assigned to the program to “stimulate improvements,” according to the government’s web page on its Special Focus Facility Initiative.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article170894757.html#storylink=cpy
Full Article & Source:
Alzheimer’s patient was sexually abused, state says. Now nursing home says it’s closing
Federal court dismisses lawsuit filed by woman accused of elder exploitation
BENTON – An Illinois woman charged with elder exploitation has lost her bid to sue Madison County after the U.S District Court for the Southern District of Illinois dismissed her lawsuit with prejudice.
Cynthia M. Crawford-Green held the health care power of attorney for her uncle, Carl Dickerson, and was the executor and beneficiary according to the terms of his will. He died in 2010. She was charged with exploitation of an elderly person and a warrant was issued for her arrest. The order states she was pulled over in Missouri in January.
According to Illinois Legal Aid online, “The Elder Abuse and Neglect Act assures that local agencies will be funded by the Illinois Department on Aging in order to offer help to persons age 60 and older who may be abused, neglected, or exploited by family, household members, or caregivers. Any person who suspects the abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation of such a person may report this suspicion to the designated local agency.”
Crawford-Green filed suit against Madison County over allegations that she had been deprived of her constitutional rights pursuant to pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint alleged that the people of Madison County wanted her to pay her uncle’s medical bills after his death, and there was no probable cause to issue the warrant.
She sought a reversal of her state court sentence, plus compensatory and punitive monetary damages. After her arrest, she lost her job, lost her home to foreclosure, and her property was seized, the order states.
On Aug. 17, the case was dismissed by the district court. Judge J. Phil Gilbert ordered that the plaintiff would recover nothing and the case was dismissed on the merits with prejudice.
In its decision, the court notes that “The named defendant in this case is 'people of Madison County Illinois.' In order to obtain relief against a municipality or other local government unit, a plaintiff must allege that the constitutional deprivations were the result of an official policy, custom, or practice of the local government.”
Crawford-Green failed to prove her case, the court ruled.
“Plaintiff has not alleged that the deprivations she complains of were made pursuant to an official policy or custom, and has provided no facts that would make such an allegation plausible. Therefore Plaintiff has not adequately pleaded a claim against Madison County,” the memorandum and order stated.
Full Article & Source:
Federal court dismisses lawsuit filed by woman accused of elder exploitation
Cynthia M. Crawford-Green held the health care power of attorney for her uncle, Carl Dickerson, and was the executor and beneficiary according to the terms of his will. He died in 2010. She was charged with exploitation of an elderly person and a warrant was issued for her arrest. The order states she was pulled over in Missouri in January.
According to Illinois Legal Aid online, “The Elder Abuse and Neglect Act assures that local agencies will be funded by the Illinois Department on Aging in order to offer help to persons age 60 and older who may be abused, neglected, or exploited by family, household members, or caregivers. Any person who suspects the abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation of such a person may report this suspicion to the designated local agency.”
Crawford-Green filed suit against Madison County over allegations that she had been deprived of her constitutional rights pursuant to pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint alleged that the people of Madison County wanted her to pay her uncle’s medical bills after his death, and there was no probable cause to issue the warrant.
She sought a reversal of her state court sentence, plus compensatory and punitive monetary damages. After her arrest, she lost her job, lost her home to foreclosure, and her property was seized, the order states.
On Aug. 17, the case was dismissed by the district court. Judge J. Phil Gilbert ordered that the plaintiff would recover nothing and the case was dismissed on the merits with prejudice.
In its decision, the court notes that “The named defendant in this case is 'people of Madison County Illinois.' In order to obtain relief against a municipality or other local government unit, a plaintiff must allege that the constitutional deprivations were the result of an official policy, custom, or practice of the local government.”
Crawford-Green failed to prove her case, the court ruled.
“Plaintiff has not alleged that the deprivations she complains of were made pursuant to an official policy or custom, and has provided no facts that would make such an allegation plausible. Therefore Plaintiff has not adequately pleaded a claim against Madison County,” the memorandum and order stated.
Full Article & Source:
Federal court dismisses lawsuit filed by woman accused of elder exploitation
How to leave no doubt about how you want your money distributed when you’re dead or incapacitated
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






