The
Illinois Supreme Court
in the past year kept seven politically connected judges on the Cook
County bench after they were rejected by voters, a common practice the
high court had pledged to curtail.
One had given more than $20,000 to the Cook County
Democratic Party. Two had connections to Illinois House Speaker
Michael Madigan. Others have ties to powerful Chicago Democrats who decide who gets the party's support to be judge.
They weren't the only active Democrats chosen for Circuit Court duty by
the high court's three justices from Chicago, all who are Democrats
themselves. A Tribune review also found the court reappointed three
judges who dropped out of judicial races, making room for the Democratic
Party's favored candidate.
Supreme Court spokesman Joseph Tybor said the appointment of judges who lost elections was "not a black and white issue."
"The appointment of qualified candidates who already have some
experience as a judge — even though they may have lost a primary
election — can be a useful way to replenish the bench with proven
judicial talent until the voters have another chance to choose in the
next election," Tybor said.
Critics have said the court's
penchant for keeping non-elected judges on the bench lacks openness and
could circumvent the will of voters.
The majority of the state's
judiciary — from circuit judges to the seven Supreme Court justices —
are elected. But the constitution gives the high court broad appointment
power in its role as supervisor of the state's court system.
For
years, the Supreme Court has kept judges on the bench after they lost
elections, citing its power under the Illinois Constitution to bring
back "retired" judges whenever it determines there is a public need — a
practice known as "recall." The Chicago Council of Lawyers threatened to
sue the Supreme Court in 1993 for the practice, and the court pledged
to stop. But it didn't.
Last year the Tribune revealed the court had
recalled to the bench 18 judges who lost elections since 2000 — many of
them active Democrats. In response to that story, the Supreme Court said
it had recently decided to stop recalling losing judges and provided a
June 2011 letter from Chief Justice Thomas Kilbride.
"In short,
our court has determined as a matter of administrative policy that
non-elected circuit and appellate court judges shall not be considered
for recall," Kilbride wrote.
But the latest Tribune review found
the court continued to keep politically connected judges on the bench
after election losses by appointing them to specific vacancies —
including two judges who were previous beneficiaries of the court's
recall practice.
Tybor said Kilbride's letter did not mean the
court would not reappoint judges who lose elections — only that they
would not be brought back under the recall procedure.
"Keep in mind, however, while the end result may be the
same (they are still on the bench) the court did not go back on the
policy it had announced last year," Tybor said in an email.
David
Morrison, deputy director of the Illinois Campaign for Political
Reform, said the Supreme Court should be more transparent in how it
fills coveted spots on the bench.
"The Supreme Court should be
less of a black box so you have an idea how they decide who should be a
judge," Morrison said. "Certainly, party affiliation and political
donations should not be a factor. The point should be to find the most
qualified and skilled lawyers to be on the bench."
How the
Supreme Court decides whom to appoint remains a mystery. Those chosen
often have a common qualification on their resumes — ties to powerful
Democratic politicians.
In Cook County, the process typically
goes like this: The Supreme Court appoints a lawyer to the bench, the
new judge later runs for election and loses, and the court then
reappoints the losing judge to the bench at the same salary and
benefits.
That's how it played out for Alfred M. Swanson Jr., a former radio news reporter, veteran lawyer and faithful Democrat.
For years, Swanson wanted to be a judge. He ran for an associate
judgeship in 2007, a process where judges are chosen not by voters but
by full Circuit Court judges in a secret ballot. Swanson ran with the
blessing of Speaker Madigan who wrote a letter endorsing him.
Still, he lost.
In October 2010 when the Supreme Court tapped him to fill the vacancy
of retiring Judge John A. Ward. The appointment seemingly gave Swanson a
leg up in the 2012 election to fill Ward's seat, allowing him to
campaign as a sitting judge.
Swanson had other factors in his
favor, as well. The Democratic Party in October 2011 endorsed him as its
preferred candidate. During the next three months, Swanson and his
campaign committee gave $20,000 to the party, according to state
campaign finance records.
All that did not matter. Voters selected former Assistant Public Defender Elizabeth Hayes over Swanson and four others.
Weeks before he was to leave the bench, the Supreme Court on Nov. 9
reappointed him to a new vacancy created with the retirement of another
judge. The appointment is good through November 2014.
Swanson declined to comment.
In addition to Swanson, four other Democrats who lost in the March
primary had their judicial wishes granted by the Supreme Court.
They are Peter J. Vilkelis, a donor to county Democrats; Gregory E.
Ahern Jr., a veteran county prosecutor backed by North Side Ald.
Richard Mell,
33rd; James L. Kaplan, a past chairman of the Illinois Board of Higher
Education; and Daniel L. Peters, a southwest suburban lawyer whose
committee gave a $450 donation to Ald.
Edward Burke, 14th. Burke runs the county's judicial slating committee.
Kaplan said he wrote a letter during the summer to the three justices from Cook County — Mary Jane Theis, Charles Freeman and
Anne Burke, the wife of Ed Burke.
"I let them know that I'd like to remain a judge," Kaplan said.
"Everyone who ran wanted to be kept around. I've done a good job so I'd
like to think the Supreme Court wanted to keep me."
Vilkelis and Peters could not be reached.
Ahern said the Supreme Court's pledge does not apply to him since he
has never been a judge and is not being recalled to the bench. He said
he first sent his resume to the justices about five years ago asking to
be considered for a judicial appointment.
"I don't have any clout," he said, "or I would have been a judge five years ago."
Also in this year's crop of appointments are two who were previously appointed under the court's recall provision.
Lauretta Higgins Wolfson, the wife of a former appellate court judge,
was first made a judge by the Supreme Court in 2006. Madigan backed her
for an associate judge position in 2008, but she wasn't selected and she
also lost when she ran for the bench that same year. Yet she has
remained on the bench ever since, without having to face voters.
That's because the court keeps reappointing her. The court issued
"recall" orders in 2008 and 2009 to keep her on the bench through late
2012. Then earlier this month, the court gave her a new appointment that
lasts until Dec. 1, 2014 — but this time, they did not issue a "recall"
order. Wolfson could not be reached for comment.
Also in this
year's crop of resurrected judges is Kenneth L. Fletcher, a politically
active former public defender who has been reappointed to the bench
multiple times after losing the 2008 Democratic primary. Fletcher did
not return a call for comment.
One other appointment since
Kilbride's letter was that of Diann K. Marsalek, a party-backed
candidate and Democratic donor. She lost the 2010 primary election and
was appointed in September 2011 despite the Chicago Council of Lawyers'
finding that she was "not qualified" to be a judge.
Marsalek, running as a sitting judge, was elected this year. She could not be reached for comment.
The Supreme Court elevated three lawyers to the bench in 2012 after
each had bowed out of his or her race instead of going up against the
Democratic Party-favored candidate.
Thomas J. Carroll was running
for judge in 2012 against Daniel R. Degnan, the son of Timothy Degnan, a
top aide to former Mayor Richard M. Daley.
Carroll's Democratic
loyalties run deep. His family was friends with Ald. Burke. He also
regularly gives to Democratic candidates, donating $250 in 2012 to
Justice Theis, a total of $500 to Madigan's 13th Ward Democratic
organization, and a total of $3,000 to Burke during the past year.
Carroll dropped out of the March primary race, leaving Daniel Degnan —
who was rated as "not recommended" by the Council of Lawyers — as the
lone candidate.
Two months later, on May 17, the Supreme Court reappointed Carroll to fill the vacancy created by the death of a judge.
"I don't know if that helped or not," Carroll said about his decision
to drop out of the race. "The Supreme Court liked me so they reappointed
me."
Carroll declined to comment on who suggested he withdraw, nor would he say if his campaign donations and ties to Burke helped.
The two others who dropped out were former state prosecutor Anthony C. Kyriakopoulos, who was running against former Ald.
Tom Allen,
and Caroline Kate Moreland, a former county prosecutor who stepped
aside in a race against Michael T. Mullen, whose campaign committee gave
$30,000 this year to the county Democratic Party.
Kyriakopoulos did not return messages. Moreland said she sought reappointment this fall and was selected Nov. 30.
"I didn't make any deals," Moreland said of withdrawing from the race.
"That was a personal and political decision that I made."
Full Article & Source:
Defeated judges find way back to bench
Bobby Schindler, brother of the late Terri Schiavo, has filed a petition in the New York Supreme Court – Chemung County asking guardianship of Gary Harvey be turned over to him. How can the County refuse to resign or disagree with the petition? How could they dare say this guardianship transfer would not be in the best interest of Gary Harvey? Legitimately, they can’t.
I am copying below three e-mails which I received from representatives of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) concerning the reason why the CFPB’s "privacy attorneys" blackened out what it did from the material which the CFPB now posts online at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=CFPB-2012-0018-1047. 
STOP The Injustice Of An Innocent Woman Being Held Against Her Will, Isolated From Family & Friends For The Past Five Years In A Nursing Facility Through No Fault Of Her Own.
The FDA finally issued a warning in 1995 about the dangers of bed rails.You've heard about that, right? Exactly. No one has. And so the deaths and injuries continued.
While she stood in open court and wanted to tell the judge she wanted to return home with her daughter Gloria J Sykes, she was denied this right. She was repeatedly denied the right to an attorney by the court. Her GAL's only listened to one party--Carolyn Toerpe and the entire procedure was railroaded. Gloria was denied the right to be her guardian--even though she lovingly cared for her for 10+ years in Mary's own home. Carolyn, who had little contact and rarely took her mother was awarded Plenary Guardianship in a railroaded proceeding.
While Florida may have been at one time, the most desired state to retire to, it is now the preferred hunting grounds of professional predators who operate within and with the cooperation of the probate court system. This is human trafficking for profit.
With just a year left of college, Tessa Venell was looking forward to her senior year. But a car accident in July 2006 left the then 21-year-old Medford resident
in a coma with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury.
Despite the dismal forecast, Tessa overcame the odds. One year after her accident, she returned to finish her degree at Brandeis University. She went on to film an environmental documentary in China and is now writing a book about her recovery and rehabilitation.
A lawsuit filed by CANHR against the Department of Public Health and Country
Villa Service Corp, challenges the state-approved practice of allowing Country
Villa nursing homes to contract out their operations to another entity owned by
Country Villa. 
A psychological study conducted by Professor Shelley Taylor reported this week that a section of the brain known as the anterior insula is to blame for elderly people being more susceptible to fall victim to scams. This new information creates an interesting addition to a study conducted earlier in the year by researchers at the University of Iowa, which recorded that aging of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex results in a lessened ability to process doubt and skepticism when taking in visual information.
Wise had worked in the office for 20 years and was the associate probate judge when the charges were brought against her earlier this year. She was elected probate judge in July and was scheduled to be sworn in Jan. 1 to the seat of retiring Judge Martin Gillette.
The center, the Florida Institute for Neurologic Rehabilitation, is fighting a state directive that it move about 50 patients to other facilities. That order followed a Bloomberg story revealing a history of violence at the center southeast of Tampa. At least five patients have died from alleged abuse or neglect there since 1998, two in the last two years. 
The decision is a major victory for Danny Reed, a brain-injury victim whose
story was featured in July in this newspaper's investigation "Loss of Trust" --
an exposé of how the Santa Clara County Superior Court long allowed estate
managers to receive outlandish fees for their court-appointed duties serving the
disabled and elderly.
"This is much bigger than me," Reed said Thursday. "It's for all the people
who can't understand what's going on. This is something that will help them
too."
According to Murray, Raymond Roche, 54, a Mahwah resident, was served with a three-count indictment after allegedly stealing settlement checks from his personal injury clients.
A federal judge in Pennsylvania has given final approval to a settlement that will pay out nearly $18 million to juveniles who allege they were wrongly jailed by corrupt judges.[Former Luzurne County Judges Michael Conahan and Mark Ciavarella]
While Ben Alfano will be much with his children this week, if only in memory, Thanksgiving eve would seem a callous time to render "final" judgment on the draining of the veteran's estate. 
“There is no disagreement that the actions of the mother, Eva Cameron, in this case were inexcusable,” the news release states. “However, Tennessee law has not anticipated such behavior and thus the Grand Jury was faced with conduct which was not necessarily indictable.”
State Sen. Cam Ward of Alabaster and Rep. Paul DeMarco of Homewood attended the press conference at the Heardmont Senior Center to show their support of the proposed legislation they are sponsoring.
